Invariant Generation through Strategy Iteration in Succinctly Represented Control Flow Graphs

We consider the problem of computing numerical invariants of programs, for instance bounds on the values of numerical program variables. More specifically, we study the problem of performing static analysis by abstract interpretation using template linear constraint domains. Such invariants can be obtained by Kleene iterations that are, in order to guarantee termination, accelerated by widening operators. In many cases, however, applying this form of extrapolation leads to invariants that are weaker than the strongest inductive invariant that can be expressed within the abstract domain in use. Another well-known source of imprecision of traditional abstract interpretation techniques stems from their use of join operators at merge nodes in the control flow graph. The mentioned weaknesses may prevent these methods from proving safety properties. The technique we develop in this article addresses both of these issues: contrary to Kleene iterations accelerated by widening operators, it is guaranteed to yield the strongest inductive invariant that can be expressed within the template linear constraint domain in use. It also eschews join operators by distinguishing all paths of loop-free code segments. Formally speaking, our technique computes the least fixpoint within a given template linear constraint domain of a transition relation that is succinctly expressed as an existentially quantified linear real arithmetic formula. In contrast to previously published techniques that rely on quantifier elimination, our algorithm is proved to have optimal complexity: we prove that the decision problem associated with our fixpoint problem is in the second level of the polynomial-time hierarchy.Comment: 35 pages, conference version published at ESOP 2011, this version is a CoRR version of our submission to Logical Methods in Computer Scienc

Optimal Planning Modulo Theories

Planning for real-world applications requires algorithms and tools with the ability to handle the complexity such scenarios entail. However, meeting the needs of such applications poses substantial challenges, both representational and algorithmic. On the one hand, expressive languages are needed to build faithful models. On the other hand, efficient solving techniques that can support these languages need to be devised. A response to this challenge is underway, and the past few years witnessed a community effort towards more expressive languages, including decidable fragments of first-order theories. In this work we focus on planning with arithmetic theories and propose Optimal Planning Modulo Theories, a framework that attempts to provide efficient means of dealing with such problems. Leveraging generic Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) solvers, we first present domain-specific encodings for optimal planning in complex logistic domains. We then present a more general, domain- independent formulation that allows to extend OMT planning to a broader class of well-studied numeric problems in planning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time OMT procedures are employed in domain-independent planning

Generating and Searching Families of FFT Algorithms

A fundamental question of longstanding theoretical interest is to prove the lowest exact count of real additions and multiplications required to compute a power-of-two discrete Fourier transform (DFT). For 35 years the split-radix algorithm held the record by requiring just 4n log n - 6n + 8 arithmetic operations on real numbers for a size-n DFT, and was widely believed to be the best possible. Recent work by Van Buskirk et al. demonstrated improvements to the split-radix operation count by using multiplier coefficients or "twiddle factors" that are not n-th roots of unity for a size-n DFT. This paper presents a Boolean Satisfiability-based proof of the lowest operation count for certain classes of DFT algorithms. First, we present a novel way to choose new yet valid twiddle factors for the nodes in flowgraphs generated by common power-of-two fast Fourier transform algorithms, FFTs. With this new technique, we can generate a large family of FFTs realizable by a fixed flowgraph. This solution space of FFTs is cast as a Boolean Satisfiability problem, and a modern Satisfiability Modulo Theory solver is applied to search for FFTs requiring the fewest arithmetic operations. Surprisingly, we find that there are FFTs requiring fewer operations than the split-radix even when all twiddle factors are n-th roots of unity.Comment: Preprint submitted on March 28, 2011, to the Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computatio

SAT-based approaches for constraint optimization

La optimització amb restriccions ha estat utilitzada amb èxit par a resoldre problemes en molts dominis reals (industrials). Aquesta tesi es centra en les aproximacions lògiques, concretament en Màxima Satisfactibilitat (MaxSAT) que és la versió d’optimització del problema de Satisfactibilitat booleana (SAT). A través de MaxSAT, s’han resolt molts problemes de forma eficient. Famílies d’instàncies de la majoria d’aquests problemes han estat sotmeses a la MaxSAT Evaluation (MSE), creant així una col•lecció pública i accessible d’instàncies de referència. En les edicions recents de la MSE, els algorismes SAT-based han estat les aproximacions que han tingut un millor comportament per a les instàncies industrials. Aquesta tesi està centrada en millorar els algorismes SAT-based . El nostre treball ha contribuït a tancar varies instàncies obertes i a reduir dramàticament el temps de resolució en moltes altres. A més, hem trobat sorprenentment que reformular y resoldre el problema MaxSAT a través de programació lineal sencera era especialment adequat per algunes famílies. Finalment, hem desenvolupat el primer portfoli altament eficient par a MaxSAT que ha dominat en totes las categories de la MSE des de 2013.La optimización con restricciones ha sido utilizada con éxito para resolver problemas en muchos dominios reales (industriales). Esta tesis se centra en las aproximaciones lógicas, concretamente en Máxima Satisfacibilidad (MaxSAT) que es la versión de optimización del problema de Satisfacibilidad booleana (SAT). A través de MaxSAT, se han resuelto muchos problemas de forma eficiente. Familias de instancias de la mayoría de ellos han sido sometidas a la MaxSAT Evaluation (MSE), creando así una colección pública y accesible de instancias de referencia. En las ediciones recientes de la MSE, los algoritmos SAT-based han sido las aproximaciones que han tenido un mejor comportamiento para las instancias industriales. Esta tesis está centrada en mejorar los algoritmos SAT-based. Nuestro trabajo ha contribuido a cerrar varias instancias abiertas y a reducir dramáticamente el tiempo de resolución en muchas otras. Además, hemos encontrado sorprendentemente que reformular y resolver el problema MaxSAT a través de programación lineal entera era especialmente adecuado para algunas familias. Finalmente, hemos desarrollado el primer portfolio altamente eficiente para MaxSAT que ha dominado en todas las categorías de la MSE desde 2013.Constraint optimization has been successfully used to solve problems in many real world (industrial) domains. This PhD thesis is focused on logic-based approaches, in particular, on Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) which is the optimization version of Satisfiability (SAT). There have been many problems efficiency solved through MaxSAT. Instance families on the majority of them have been submitted to the international MaxSAT Evaluation (MSE), creating a collection of publicly available benchmark instances. At recent editions of MSE, SAT-based algorithms were the best performing single algorithm approaches for industrial problems. This PhD thesis is focused on the improvement of SAT-based algorithms. All this work has contributed to close up some open instances and to reduce dramatically the solving time in many others. In addition, we have surprisingly found that reformulating and solving the MaxSAT problem through Integer Linear Programming (ILP) was extremely well suited for some families. Finally, we have developed the first highly efficient MaxSAT portfolio that dominated all categories of MSE since 2013

Berechnung von Attributsgrenzen für Teilkonfigurationen mit JavaSMT

Software product lines are able to describe multiple products sharing a common base of features and are commonly described as feature models. For complex software product lines, automatic analyses are required to ensure validity and to improve the interactive configuration process. Modern SAT solvers are vital components for the validation process of feature models. The increasing variability of software product lines implies the need to use more expressive solvers like SMT solvers. To assist the development of feature modeling tools, we compare SAT and SMT solvers for the automated analysis of feature models. During this thesis, we create an abstract data type to formally define analyses for feature model defects and their explanations. The result shows that SAT solvers are more efficient at detecting the defects, while SMT solvers can find explanations for them multiple times faster. Feature models can be further expanded by attaching attributes to features. Such attributes may contain a numerical value. Additionally, one attribute can be defined for multiple features. In this thesis, we aim to support the interactive configuration process, by providing the range of the sum of values for an attribute. Such ranges depend on the remaining choices in a configuration of the product line. We provide an exact computation using SMT and an approximation using a heuristic. The evaluation results show that an SMT solver is not suitable for supporting interactive configuration. However, the approximated ranges of the provided heuristic were very close to the exact ones

Efficient local search for Pseudo Boolean Optimization

Algorithms and the Foundations of Software technolog

Solving hard industrial combinatorial problems with SAT

The topic of this thesis is the development of SAT-based techniques and tools for solving industrial combinatorial problems. First, it describes the architecture of state-of-the-art SAT and SMT Solvers based on the classical DPLL procedure. These systems can be used as black boxes for solving combinatorial problems. However, sometimes we can increase their efficiency with slight modifications of the basic algorithm. Therefore, the study and development of techniques for adjusting SAT Solvers to specific combinatorial problems is the first goal of this thesis. Namely, SAT Solvers can only deal with propositional logic. For solving general combinatorial problems, two different approaches are possible: - Reducing the complex constraints into propositional clauses. - Enriching the SAT Solver language. The first approach corresponds to encoding the constraint into SAT. The second one corresponds to using propagators, the basis for SMT Solvers. Regarding the first approach, in this document we improve the encoding of two of the most important combinatorial constraints: cardinality constraints and pseudo-Boolean constraints. After that, we present a new mixed approach, called lazy decomposition, which combines the advantages of encodings and propagators. The other part of the thesis uses these theoretical improvements in industrial combinatorial problems. We give a method for efficiently scheduling some professional sport leagues with SAT. The results are promising and show that a SAT approach is valid for these problems. However, the chaotical behavior of CDCL-based SAT Solvers due to VSIDS heuristics makes it difficult to obtain a similar solution for two similar problems. This may be inconvenient in real-world problems, since a user expects similar solutions when it makes slight modifications to the problem specification. In order to overcome this limitation, we have studied and solved the close solution problem, i.e., the problem of quickly finding a close solution when a similar problem is considered