25,018 research outputs found
Solving Problems on Graphs of High Rank-Width
A modulator of a graph G to a specified graph class H is a set of vertices
whose deletion puts G into H. The cardinality of a modulator to various
tractable graph classes has long been used as a structural parameter which can
be exploited to obtain FPT algorithms for a range of hard problems. Here we
investigate what happens when a graph contains a modulator which is large but
"well-structured" (in the sense of having bounded rank-width). Can such
modulators still be exploited to obtain efficient algorithms? And is it even
possible to find such modulators efficiently?
We first show that the parameters derived from such well-structured
modulators are strictly more general than the cardinality of modulators and
rank-width itself. Then, we develop an FPT algorithm for finding such
well-structured modulators to any graph class which can be characterized by a
finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs. We proceed by showing how
well-structured modulators can be used to obtain efficient parameterized
algorithms for Minimum Vertex Cover and Maximum Clique. Finally, we use
well-structured modulators to develop an algorithmic meta-theorem for deciding
problems expressible in Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic, and prove that this
result is tight in the sense that it cannot be generalized to LinEMSO problems.Comment: Accepted at WADS 201
Solving weighted and counting variants of connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth deterministically in single exponential time
It is well known that many local graph problems, like Vertex Cover and
Dominating Set, can be solved in 2^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)} time for graphs G=(V,E)
with a given tree decomposition of width tw. However, for nonlocal problems,
like the fundamental class of connectivity problems, for a long time we did not
know how to do this faster than tw^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)}. Recently, Cygan et al.
(FOCS 2011) presented Monte Carlo algorithms for a wide range of connectivity
problems running in time $c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} for a small constant c, e.g., for
Hamiltonian Cycle and Steiner tree. Naturally, this raises the question whether
randomization is necessary to achieve this runtime; furthermore, it is
desirable to also solve counting and weighted versions (the latter without
incurring a pseudo-polynomial cost in terms of the weights).
We present two new approaches rooted in linear algebra, based on matrix rank
and determinants, which provide deterministic c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} time algorithms,
also for weighted and counting versions. For example, in this time we can solve
the traveling salesman problem or count the number of Hamiltonian cycles. The
rank-based ideas provide a rather general approach for speeding up even
straightforward dynamic programming formulations by identifying "small" sets of
representative partial solutions; we focus on the case of expressing
connectivity via sets of partitions, but the essential ideas should have
further applications. The determinant-based approach uses the matrix tree
theorem for deriving closed formulas for counting versions of connectivity
problems; we show how to evaluate those formulas via dynamic programming.Comment: 36 page
Are there any good digraph width measures?
Several different measures for digraph width have appeared in the last few
years. However, none of them shares all the "nice" properties of treewidth:
First, being \emph{algorithmically useful} i.e. admitting polynomial-time
algorithms for all \MS1-definable problems on digraphs of bounded width. And,
second, having nice \emph{structural properties} i.e. being monotone under
taking subdigraphs and some form of arc contractions. As for the former,
(undirected) \MS1 seems to be the least common denominator of all reasonably
expressive logical languages on digraphs that can speak about the edge/arc
relation on the vertex set.The latter property is a necessary condition for a
width measure to be characterizable by some version of the cops-and-robber game
characterizing the ordinary treewidth. Our main result is that \emph{any
reasonable} algorithmically useful and structurally nice digraph measure cannot
be substantially different from the treewidth of the underlying undirected
graph. Moreover, we introduce \emph{directed topological minors} and argue that
they are the weakest useful notion of minors for digraphs
Meta-Kernelization using Well-Structured Modulators
Kernelization investigates exact preprocessing algorithms with performance
guarantees. The most prevalent type of parameters used in kernelization is the
solution size for optimization problems; however, also structural parameters
have been successfully used to obtain polynomial kernels for a wide range of
problems. Many of these parameters can be defined as the size of a smallest
modulator of the given graph into a fixed graph class (i.e., a set of vertices
whose deletion puts the graph into the graph class). Such parameters admit the
construction of polynomial kernels even when the solution size is large or not
applicable. This work follows up on the research on meta-kernelization
frameworks in terms of structural parameters.
We develop a class of parameters which are based on a more general view on
modulators: instead of size, the parameters employ a combination of rank-width
and split decompositions to measure structure inside the modulator. This allows
us to lift kernelization results from modulator-size to more general
parameters, hence providing smaller kernels. We show (i) how such large but
well-structured modulators can be efficiently approximated, (ii) how they can
be used to obtain polynomial kernels for any graph problem expressible in
Monadic Second Order logic, and (iii) how they allow the extension of previous
results in the area of structural meta-kernelization
- …