String unification is essentially infinitary

A unifier of two terms s and t is a substitution sigma such that ssigma=tsigma and for first-order terms there exists a most general unifier sigma in the sense that any other unifier delta can be composed from sigma with some substitution lambda, i.e. delta=sigmacirclambda. This notion can be generalised to E-unificationwhere E is an equational theory, =_{E} is equality under E andsigmaa is an E-unifier if ssigma =_{E}tsigma. Depending on the equational theory E, the set of most general unifiers is always a singleton (as above), or it may have more than one, either finitely or infinitely many unifiers and for some theories it may not even exist, in which case we call the theory of type nullary. String unification (or Löb\u27s problem, Markov\u27s problem, unification of word equations or Makanin\u27s problem as it is often called in the literature) is the E-unification problem, where E = {f(x,f(y,z))=f(f(x,y),z)}, i.e. unification under associativity or string unification once we drop the fs and the brackets. It is well known that this problem is infinitary and decidable. Essential unifiers, as introduced by Hoche and Szabo, generalise the notion of a most general unifier and have a dramatically pleasant effect on the set of most general unifiers: the set of essential unifiers is often much smaller than the set of most general unifiers. Essential unification may even reduce an infinitary theory to an essentially finitary theory. The most dramatic reduction known so far is obtained for idempotent semigroups or bands as they are called in computer science: bands are of type nullary, i.e. there exist two unifiable terms s and t, but the set of most general unifiers is not enumerable. This is in stark contrast to essential unification: the set of essential unifiers for bands always exists and is finite. We show in this paper that the early hope for a similar reduction of unification under associativity is not justified: string unification is essentially infinitary. But we give an enumeration algorithm for essential unifiers. And beyond, this algorithm terminates when the considered problem is finitary

The word problem for one-relation monoids: a survey

This survey is intended to provide an overview of one of the oldest and most celebrated open problems in combinatorial algebra: the word problem for one-relation monoids. We provide a history of the problem starting in 1914, and give a detailed overview of the proofs of central results, especially those due to Adian and his student Oganesian. After showing how to reduce the problem to the left cancellative case, the second half of the survey focuses on various methods for solving partial cases in this family. We finish with some modern and very recent results pertaining to this problem, including a link to the Collatz conjecture. Along the way, we emphasise and address a number of incorrect and inaccurate statements that have appeared in the literature over the years. We also fill a gap in the proof of a theorem linking special inverse monoids to one-relation monoids, and slightly strengthen the statement of this theorem

Unification theory

The purpose of this paper is not to give an overview of the state of art in unification theory. It is intended to be a short introduction into the area of equational unification which should give the reader a feeling for what unification theory might be about. The basic notions such as complete and minimal complete sets of unifiers, and unification types of equational theories are introduced and illustrated by examples. Then we shall describe the original motivations for considering unification (in the empty theory) in resolution theorem proving and term rewriting. Starting with Robinson\u27s first unification algorithm it will be sketched how more efficient unification algorithms can be derived. We shall then explain the reasons which lead to the introduction of unification in non-empty theories into the above mentioned areas theorem proving and term rewriting. For theory unification it makes a difference whether single equations or systems of equations are considered. In addition, one has to be careful with regard to the signature over which the terms of the unification problems can be built. This leads to the distinction between elementary unification, unification with constants, and general unification (where arbitrary free function symbols may occur). Going from elementary unification to general unification is an instance of the so-called combination problem for equational theories which can be formulated as follows: Let E, F be equational theories over disjoint signatures. How can unification algorithms for E, F be combined to a unification algorithm for the theory E cup F

The word problem and combinatorial methods for groups and semigroups

The subject matter of this thesis is combinatorial semigroup theory. It includes material, in no particular order, from combinatorial and geometric group theory, formal language theory, theoretical computer science, the history of mathematics, formal logic, model theory, graph theory, and decidability theory. In Chapter 1, we will give an overview of the mathematical background required to state the results of the remaining chapters. The only originality therein lies in the exposition of special monoids presented in §1.3, which uni.es the approaches by several authors. In Chapter 2, we introduce some general algebraic and language-theoretic constructions which will be useful in subsequent chapters. As a corollary of these general methods, we recover and generalise a recent result by Brough, Cain & Pfei.er that the class of monoids with context-free word problem is closed under taking free products. In Chapter 3, we study language-theoretic and algebraic properties of special monoids, and completely classify this theory in terms of the group of units. As a result, we generalise the Muller-Schupp theorem to special monoids, and answer a question posed by Zhang in 1992. In Chapter 4, we give a similar treatment to weakly compressible monoids, and characterise their language-theoretic properties. As a corollary, we deduce many new results for one-relation monoids, including solving the rational subset membership problem for many such monoids. We also prove, among many other results, that it is decidable whether a one-relation monoid containing a non-trivial idempotent has context-free word problem. In Chapter 5, we study context-free graphs, and connect the algebraic theory of special monoids with the geometric behaviour of their Cayley graphs. This generalises the geometric aspects of the Muller-Schupp theorem for groups to special monoids. We study the growth rate of special monoids, and prove that a special monoid of intermediate growth is a group