IETF standardization in the field of the Internet of Things (IoT): a survey

Smart embedded objects will become an important part of what is called the Internet of Things. However, the integration of embedded devices into the Internet introduces several challenges, since many of the existing Internet technologies and protocols were not designed for this class of devices. In the past few years, there have been many efforts to enable the extension of Internet technologies to constrained devices. Initially, this resulted in proprietary protocols and architectures. Later, the integration of constrained devices into the Internet was embraced by IETF, moving towards standardized IP-based protocols. In this paper, we will briefly review the history of integrating constrained devices into the Internet, followed by an extensive overview of IETF standardization work in the 6LoWPAN, ROLL and CoRE working groups. This is complemented with a broad overview of related research results that illustrate how this work can be extended or used to tackle other problems and with a discussion on open issues and challenges. As such the aim of this paper is twofold: apart from giving readers solid insights in IETF standardization work on the Internet of Things, it also aims to encourage readers to further explore the world of Internet-connected objects, pointing to future research opportunities

Topology Construction in RPL Networks over Beacon-Enabled 802.15.4

In this paper, we propose a new scheme that allows coupling beacon-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 with the RPL routing protocol while keeping full compliance with both standards. We provide a means for RPL to pass the routing information to Layer 2 before the 802.15.4 topology is created by encapsulating RPL DIO messages in beacon frames. The scheme takes advantage of 802.15.4 command frames to solicit RPL DIO messages. The effect of the command frames is to reset the Trickle timer that governs sending DIO messages. We provide a detailed analysis of the overhead incurred by the proposed scheme to understand topology construction costs. We have evaluated the scheme using Contiki and the instruction-level Cooja simulator and compared our results against the most common scheme used for dissemination of the upper-layer information in beacon-enabled PANs. The results show energy savings during the topology construction phase and in the steady state

Coherent, automatic address resolution for vehicular ad hoc networks

Published in: Int. J. of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2017 Vol.25, No.3, pp.163 - 179. DOI: 10.1504/IJAHUC.2017.10001935The interest in vehicular communications has increased notably. In this paper, the use of the address resolution (AR) procedures is studied for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). We analyse the poor performance of AR transactions in such networks and we present a new proposal called coherent, automatic address resolution (CAAR). Our approach inhibits the use of AR transactions and instead increases the usefulness of routing signalling to automatically match the IP and MAC addresses. Through extensive simulations in realistic VANET scenarios using the Estinet simulator, we compare our proposal CAAR to classical AR and to another of our proposals that enhances AR for mobile wireless networks, called AR+. In addition, we present a performance evaluation of the behaviour of CAAR, AR and AR+ with unicast traffic of a reporting service for VANETs. Results show that CAAR outperforms the other two solutions in terms of packet losses and furthermore, it does not introduce additional overhead.Postprint (published version

Evolving SDN for Low-Power IoT Networks

Software Defined Networking (SDN) offers a flexible and scalable architecture that abstracts decision making away from individual devices and provides a programmable network platform. However, implementing a centralized SDN architecture within the constraints of a low-power wireless network faces considerable challenges. Not only is controller traffic subject to jitter due to unreliable links and network contention, but the overhead generated by SDN can severely affect the performance of other traffic. This paper addresses the challenge of bringing high-overhead SDN architecture to IEEE 802.15.4 networks. We explore how traditional SDN needs to evolve in order to overcome the constraints of low-power wireless networks, and discuss protocol and architectural optimizations necessary to reduce SDN control overhead - the main barrier to successful implementation. We argue that interoperability with the existing protocol stack is necessary to provide a platform for controller discovery and coexistence with legacy networks. We consequently introduce {\mu}SDN, a lightweight SDN framework for Contiki, with both IPv6 and underlying routing protocol interoperability, as well as optimizing a number of elements within the SDN architecture to reduce control overhead to practical levels. We evaluate {\mu}SDN in terms of latency, energy, and packet delivery. Through this evaluation we show how the cost of SDN control overhead (both bootstrapping and management) can be reduced to a point where comparable performance and scalability is achieved against an IEEE 802.15.4-2012 RPL-based network. Additionally, we demonstrate {\mu}SDN through simulation: providing a use-case where the SDN configurability can be used to provide Quality of Service (QoS) for critical network flows experiencing interference, and we achieve considerable reductions in delay and jitter in comparison to a scenario without SDN

Securing Low-Power Blockchain-Enabled IoT Devices Against Energy Depletion Attack

Blockchain-enabled Internet of Things (IoT) envisions a world with rapid development and implementations to change our everyday lives based on smart devices. These devices are attached to the internet that can communicate with each other without human interference. A well-known wireless network in blockchain-enabled IoT frameworks is the Low Power and Lossy Network (LLN) that uses a novel protocol known as Routing protocol for low power and lossy networks (RPL) to provide effective and energy-efficient routing. LLNs that run on RPL are inherently prone to multiple Denial of Service (DoS) attacks due to the low cost, shared medium. and resource-constrained nature of blockchain-enabled IoT devices. A Spam DODAG Information Solicitation (DIS) attack is one of the novel attacks that drain the energy source of legitimate nodes and ends up causing the legitimate nodes to suffer from DoS. To address this problem, a mitigation scheme named DIS Spam Attack Mitigation (DISAM) is proposed. The proposed scheme effectively mitigates the effects of the Spam DIS attack on the network’s performance. The experimental results show that DISAM detects and mitigates the attack quickly and efficiently

Denial of service mitigation approach for IPv6-enabled smart object networks

Denial of service (DoS) attacks can be defined as any third-party action aiming to reduce or eliminate a network's capability to perform its expected functions. Although there are several standard techniques in traditional computing that mitigate the impact of some of the most common DoS attacks, this still remains a very important open problem to the network security community. DoS attacks are even more troublesome in smart object networks because of two main reasons. First, these devices cannot support the computational overhead required to implement many of the typical counterattack strategies. Second, low traffic rates are enough to drain sensors' battery energy making the network inoperable in short times. To realize the Internet of Things vision, it is necessary to integrate the smart objects into the Internet. This integration is considered an exceptional opportunity for Internet growth but, also, a security threat, because more attacks, including DoS, can be conducted. For these reasons, the prevention of DoS attacks is considered a hot topic in the wireless sensor networks scientific community. In this paper, an approach based on 6LowPAN neighbor discovery protocol is proposed to mitigate DoS attacks initiated from the Internet, without adding additional overhead on the 6LoWPAN sensor devices.This work has been partially supported by the Instituto de Telecomunicacoes, Next Generation Networks and Applications Group (NetGNA), Portugal, and by National Funding from the FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia through the Pest-OE/EEI/LA0008/2011.Oliveira, LML.; Rodrigues, JJPC.; De Sousa, AF.; Lloret, J. (2013). Denial of service mitigation approach for IPv6-enabled smart object networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 25(1):129-142. doi:10.1002/cpe.2850S129142251Gershenfeld, N., Krikorian, R., & Cohen, D. (2004). The Internet of Things. Scientific American, 291(4), 76-81. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1004-76Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393-422. doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(01)00302-4Karl, H., & Willig, A. (2005). Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks. doi:10.1002/0470095121IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006 Part 15.4: wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specificationsfor low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs) 2006ZigBee Alliance ZigBee Specification 2007WirelessHARThomepage 2012 http://www.hartcomm.org/Hui, J. W., & Culler, D. E. (2008). Extending IP to Low-Power, Wireless Personal Area Networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(4), 37-45. doi:10.1109/mic.2008.79Kushalnagar N Montenegro G Schumacher C IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement, and Goals 2007Montenegro G Kushalnagar N Hui J Culler D Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks 2007Shelby Z Thubert P Hui J Chakrabarti S Bormann C Nordmark E 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery 2011Zhou, L., Chao, H.-C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Joint Forensics-Scheduling Strategy for Delay-Sensitive Multimedia Applications over Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(7), 1358-1367. doi:10.1109/jsac.2011.110803Roman, R., & Lopez, J. (2009). Integrating wireless sensor networks and the internet: a security analysis. Internet Research, 19(2), 246-259. doi:10.1108/10662240910952373Wang, Y., Attebury, G., & Ramamurthy, B. (2006). A survey of security issues in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 8(2), 2-23. doi:10.1109/comst.2006.315852Xiaojiang Du, & Hsiao-Hwa Chen. (2008). Security in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(4), 60-66. doi:10.1109/mwc.2008.4599222Pelechrinis, K., Iliofotou, M., & Krishnamurthy, S. V. (2011). Denial of Service Attacks in Wireless Networks: The Case of Jammers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(2), 245-257. doi:10.1109/surv.2011.041110.00022Zhou, L., Wang, X., Tu, W., Muntean, G., & Geller, B. (2010). Distributed scheduling scheme for video streaming over multi-channel multi-radio multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 28(3), 409-419. doi:10.1109/jsac.2010.100412Lin, K., Lai, C.-F., Liu, X., & Guan, X. (2010). Energy Efficiency Routing with Node Compromised Resistance in Wireless Sensor Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 17(1), 75-89. doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0287-xLi, H., Lin, K., & Li, K. (2011). Energy-efficient and high-accuracy secure data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 34(4), 591-597. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2010.02.026Oliveira, L. M. L., de Sousa, A. F., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2011). Routing and mobility approaches in IPv6 over LoWPAN mesh networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 24(11), 1445-1466. doi:10.1002/dac.1228Narten T Nordmark E Simpson W Soliman H Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) 2007Singh H Beebee W Nordmark E IPv6 Subnet Model: The Relationship between Links and Subnet Prefixes 2010Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Gritzalis, S. (2008). Situation awareness mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46(4), 102-107. doi:10.1109/mcom.2008.4481348Sakarindr, P., & Ansari, N. (2007). Security services in group communications over wireless infrastructure, mobile ad hoc, and wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(5), 8-20. doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.4396938Tsao T Alexander R Dohler M Daza V Lozano A A Security Framework for Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks 2009Karlof C Wagner D Secure Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: Attacks and Countermeasures First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications 2003 113 127 10.1109/SNPA.2003.1203362Hui J Thubert P Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams in 6LoWPAN Networks 2009Elaine Shi, & Perrig, A. (2004). Designing Secure Sensor Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 38-43. doi:10.1109/mwc.2004.1368895Akkaya, K., & Younis, M. (2005). A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 325-349. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2003.09.01

Atomic-SDN: Is Synchronous Flooding the Solution to Software-Defined Networking in IoT?

The adoption of Software Defined Networking (SDN) within traditional networks has provided operators the ability to manage diverse resources and easily reconfigure networks as requirements change. Recent research has extended this concept to IEEE 802.15.4 low-power wireless networks, which form a key component of the Internet of Things (IoT). However, the multiple traffic patterns necessary for SDN control makes it difficult to apply this approach to these highly challenging environments. This paper presents Atomic-SDN, a highly reliable and low-latency solution for SDN in low-power wireless. Atomic-SDN introduces a novel Synchronous Flooding (SF) architecture capable of dynamically configuring SF protocols to satisfy complex SDN control requirements, and draws from the authors' previous experiences in the IEEE EWSN Dependability Competition: where SF solutions have consistently outperformed other entries. Using this approach, Atomic-SDN presents considerable performance gains over other SDN implementations for low-power IoT networks. We evaluate Atomic-SDN through simulation and experimentation, and show how utilizing SF techniques provides latency and reliability guarantees to SDN control operations as the local mesh scales. We compare Atomic-SDN against other SDN implementations based on the IEEE 802.15.4 network stack, and establish that Atomic-SDN improves SDN control by orders-of-magnitude across latency, reliability, and energy-efficiency metrics