591 research outputs found
Automatic Software Repair: a Bibliography
This article presents a survey on automatic software repair. Automatic
software repair consists of automatically finding a solution to software bugs
without human intervention. This article considers all kinds of repairs. First,
it discusses behavioral repair where test suites, contracts, models, and
crashing inputs are taken as oracle. Second, it discusses state repair, also
known as runtime repair or runtime recovery, with techniques such as checkpoint
and restart, reconfiguration, and invariant restoration. The uniqueness of this
article is that it spans the research communities that contribute to this body
of knowledge: software engineering, dependability, operating systems,
programming languages, and security. It provides a novel and structured
overview of the diversity of bug oracles and repair operators used in the
literature
Automated Fixing of Programs with Contracts
This paper describes AutoFix, an automatic debugging technique that can fix
faults in general-purpose software. To provide high-quality fix suggestions and
to enable automation of the whole debugging process, AutoFix relies on the
presence of simple specification elements in the form of contracts (such as
pre- and postconditions). Using contracts enhances the precision of dynamic
analysis techniques for fault detection and localization, and for validating
fixes. The only required user input to the AutoFix supporting tool is then a
faulty program annotated with contracts; the tool produces a collection of
validated fixes for the fault ranked according to an estimate of their
suitability.
In an extensive experimental evaluation, we applied AutoFix to over 200
faults in four code bases of different maturity and quality (of implementation
and of contracts). AutoFix successfully fixed 42% of the faults, producing, in
the majority of cases, corrections of quality comparable to those competent
programmers would write; the used computational resources were modest, with an
average time per fix below 20 minutes on commodity hardware. These figures
compare favorably to the state of the art in automated program fixing, and
demonstrate that the AutoFix approach is successfully applicable to reduce the
debugging burden in real-world scenarios.Comment: Minor changes after proofreadin
Automatic error detection using program invariants for fault localization
Tese de Mestrado Integrado. Engenharia Informática e Computação. Faculdade de Engenharia. Universidade do Porto. 201
Learning Tractable Probabilistic Models for Fault Localization
In recent years, several probabilistic techniques have been applied to
various debugging problems. However, most existing probabilistic debugging
systems use relatively simple statistical models, and fail to generalize across
multiple programs. In this work, we propose Tractable Fault Localization Models
(TFLMs) that can be learned from data, and probabilistically infer the location
of the bug. While most previous statistical debugging methods generalize over
many executions of a single program, TFLMs are trained on a corpus of
previously seen buggy programs, and learn to identify recurring patterns of
bugs. Widely-used fault localization techniques such as TARANTULA evaluate the
suspiciousness of each line in isolation; in contrast, a TFLM defines a joint
probability distribution over buggy indicator variables for each line. Joint
distributions with rich dependency structure are often computationally
intractable; TFLMs avoid this by exploiting recent developments in tractable
probabilistic models (specifically, Relational SPNs). Further, TFLMs can
incorporate additional sources of information, including coverage-based
features such as TARANTULA. We evaluate the fault localization performance of
TFLMs that include TARANTULA scores as features in the probabilistic model. Our
study shows that the learned TFLMs isolate bugs more effectively than previous
statistical methods or using TARANTULA directly.Comment: Fifth International Workshop on Statistical Relational AI (StaR-AI
2015
Dynamic Analysis can be Improved with Automatic Test Suite Refactoring
Context: Developers design test suites to automatically verify that software
meets its expected behaviors. Many dynamic analysis techniques are performed on
the exploitation of execution traces from test cases. However, in practice,
there is only one trace that results from the execution of one manually-written
test case.
Objective: In this paper, we propose a new technique of test suite
refactoring, called B-Refactoring. The idea behind B-Refactoring is to split a
test case into small test fragments, which cover a simpler part of the control
flow to provide better support for dynamic analysis.
Method: For a given dynamic analysis technique, our test suite refactoring
approach monitors the execution of test cases and identifies small test cases
without loss of the test ability. We apply B-Refactoring to assist two existing
analysis tasks: automatic repair of if-statements bugs and automatic analysis
of exception contracts.
Results: Experimental results show that test suite refactoring can
effectively simplify the execution traces of the test suite. Three real-world
bugs that could previously not be fixed with the original test suite are fixed
after applying B-Refactoring; meanwhile, exception contracts are better
verified via applying B-Refactoring to original test suites.
Conclusions: We conclude that applying B-Refactoring can effectively improve
the purity of test cases. Existing dynamic analysis tasks can be enhanced by
test suite refactoring
Learning likely invariants to explain why a program fails
Debugging is difficult. Recent studies show that automatic bug localization
techniques have limited usefulness. One of the reasons is that programmers
typically have to understand why the program fails before fixing it. In this
work, we aim to help programmers understand a bug by automatically generating
likely invariants which are violated in the failed tests. Given a program with
an initial assertion and at least one test case failing the assertion, we first
generate random test cases, identify potential bug locations through bug
localization, and then generate program state mutation based on active learning
techniques to identify a predicate "explaining" the cause of the bug. The
predicate is a classifier for the passed test cases and failed test cases. Our
main contribution is the application of invariant learning for bug explanation,
as well as a novel approach to overcome the problem of lack of test cases in
practice. We apply our method to real-world bugs and show the generated
invariants are often correlated to the actual bug fixes.Comment: 10 page
- …