In [5], Mehlhorn presented an algorithm for sorting nearly sorted sequences of length n in time 0(n(1+log(F/n))) where F is the number of initial inversions. More recently, Dijkstra[3] presented a new algorithm for sorting in situ. Without giving much evidence of it, he claims that his algorithm works well on nearly sorted sequences. In this note we show that smoothsort compares unfavorably to Mehlhorn's algorithm. We present a sequence of length n with O(nlogn) inversions which forces smoothsort to use time Omega(nlog n), contrasting to the time O(nloglogn) Mehlhorn's algorithm would need