8,886 research outputs found
LiveCap: Real-time Human Performance Capture from Monocular Video
We present the first real-time human performance capture approach that
reconstructs dense, space-time coherent deforming geometry of entire humans in
general everyday clothing from just a single RGB video. We propose a novel
two-stage analysis-by-synthesis optimization whose formulation and
implementation are designed for high performance. In the first stage, a skinned
template model is jointly fitted to background subtracted input video, 2D and
3D skeleton joint positions found using a deep neural network, and a set of
sparse facial landmark detections. In the second stage, dense non-rigid 3D
deformations of skin and even loose apparel are captured based on a novel
real-time capable algorithm for non-rigid tracking using dense photometric and
silhouette constraints. Our novel energy formulation leverages automatically
identified material regions on the template to model the differing non-rigid
deformation behavior of skin and apparel. The two resulting non-linear
optimization problems per-frame are solved with specially-tailored
data-parallel Gauss-Newton solvers. In order to achieve real-time performance
of over 25Hz, we design a pipelined parallel architecture using the CPU and two
commodity GPUs. Our method is the first real-time monocular approach for
full-body performance capture. Our method yields comparable accuracy with
off-line performance capture techniques, while being orders of magnitude
faster
A discussion on the validation tests employed to compare human action recognition methods using the MSR Action3D dataset
This paper aims to determine which is the best human action recognition
method based on features extracted from RGB-D devices, such as the Microsoft
Kinect. A review of all the papers that make reference to MSR Action3D, the
most used dataset that includes depth information acquired from a RGB-D device,
has been performed. We found that the validation method used by each work
differs from the others. So, a direct comparison among works cannot be made.
However, almost all the works present their results comparing them without
taking into account this issue. Therefore, we present different rankings
according to the methodology used for the validation in orden to clarify the
existing confusion.Comment: 16 pages and 7 table
- …