Review on auto-depth control system for an unmanned underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) using intelligent controller

This paper presents a review of auto-depth control system for an Unmanned Underwater Remotely operated Vehicle (ROV), focusing on the Artificial Intelligent Controller Techniques. Specifically, Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) is utilized in auto-depth control system for the ROV. This review covered recently published documents for auto-depth control of an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV). This paper also describes the control issues in UUV especially for the ROV, which has inspired the authors to develop a new technique for auto-depth control of the ROV, called the SIFLC. This technique was the outcome of an investigation and tuning of two parameters, namely the break point and slope for the piecewise linear or slope for the linear approximation. Hardware comparison of the same concepts of ROV design was also discussed. The ROV design is for smallscale, open frame and lower speed. The review on auto-depth control system for ROV, provides insights for readers to design new techniques and algorithms for auto-depth control

Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller For Yaw Control Of Underwater Remotely Operated Crawler

Underwater Remotely Operated Crawler (ROC) is a class of the Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) that is tethered, unoccupied, manoeuvres on the seabed and remotely operated by a pilot from a platform. Underwater characteristic parameters such as added mass, buoyancy, hydrodynamic forces, underwater currents, including pressure could considerably affect and reduce the mobility of the ROC. The challenges faced by the ROCs are that the needs to reduce the overshoot in the system response, including, the time response and settling time. For yaw control (a motion around the z-axis), an occurrence of an overshoot in the system response is highly intolerable. Reducing the overshoot in the ROC trajectory is crucial since there are many challenging underwater natures and underwater vehicle control problems while studies on finding the solutions are still ongoing to find an improvement. Conventional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller is not robust to be applied in the ROC due to the non-linear dynamic model of the ROC and underwater conditions. Besides that, by reducing the overshoot, the ROC mobility will be much more efficient and provided a reliable platform for underwater data mining. This study is focused to give an optimum performance of yaw control without overshoot in the system response and faster time response. This research begins by designing an underwater ROC as the research’s platform. Then, the designed ROC is simulated by using SolidWorks software obtain the analysis of structural integrity and hydrodynamic properties. System identification technique is conducted to obtain the empirical modelling design of the fabricated ROC which equipped with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor. The fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is designed based on 5 by 5 rule matrix which has to deal with fuzzification, rule base, inference mechanism and defuzzification operations. A simplification of the FLC is proposed and the method is called Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller (SIFLC). The simplification is achieved by applying the “signed distance method” where the SIFLC reduces the two-input FLC to a single input FLC. In other words, SIFLC is based on the signed distance method which eventually reduces the controller as single input-single output (SISO) controller. A PID controller is designed for the purpose of benchmarking with the FLC and SIFLC. SIFLC has the capability to adapt the non-linear underwater parameters (currents, waves and etc.). This research has discussed and compared the performance of PID, FLC and SIFLC. The algorithm is verified in MATLAB/Simulink software. Based on the results, SIFLC provides more robust and reliable control system. Based on the computation results, SIFLC reduces the percentage of overshoot (%OS) of the system and achieve 0.121%, while other controllers (PID and FLC) 4.4% and 1.7% respectively. Even that so, this does not mean that PID and FLC are not reliable but due to the presence of %OS

Intelligent Control Strategies for an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

The dynamic characteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) present a control problem that classical methods cannot often accommodate easily. Fundamentally, AUV dynamics are highly non-linear, and the relative similarity between the linear and angular velocities about each degree of freedom means that control schemes employed within other flight vehicles are not always applicable. In such instances, intelligent control strategies offer a more sophisticated approach to the design of the control algorithm. Neurofuzzy control is one such technique, which fuses the beneficial properties of neural networks and fuzzy logic in a hybrid control architecture. Such an approach is highly suited to development of an autopilot for an AUV. Specifically, the adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is discussed in Chapter 4 as an effective new approach for neurally tuning course-changing fuzzy autopilots. However, the limitation of this technique is that it cannot be used for developing multivariable fuzzy structures. Consequently, the co-active ANFIS (CANFIS) architecture is developed and employed as a novel multi variable AUV autopilot within Chapter 5, whereby simultaneous control of the AUV yaw and roll channels is achieved. Moreover, this structure is flexible in that it is extended in Chapter 6 to perform on-line control of the AUV leading to a novel autopilot design that can accommodate changing vehicle pay loads and environmental disturbances. Whilst the typical ANFIS and CANFIS structures prove effective for AUV control system design, the well known properties of radial basis function networks (RBFN) offer a more flexible controller architecture. Chapter 7 presents a new approach to fuzzy modelling and employs both ANFIS and CANFIS structures with non-linear consequent functions of composite Gaussian form. This merger of CANFIS and a RBFN lends itself naturally to tuning with an extended form of the hybrid learning rule, and provides a very effective approach to intelligent controller development.The Sea Systems and Platform Integration Sector, Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, Winfrit

Depth control of an underwater remotely operated vehicle using neural network predictive control

This paper investigates the depth control of an unmanned underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) using neural network predictive control (NNPC). The NNPC is applied to control the depth of the ROV to improve the performances of system response in terms of overshoot. To assess the viability of the method, the system was simulated using MATLAB/Simulink by neural network predictive control toolbox. In this paper also investigates the number of data samples (1000, 5000 and 10,000) to train neural network. The simulation reveals that the NNPC has the better performance in terms of its response, but the execution time will be increased. The comparison between other controller such as conventional PI controller, Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR) and fuzzy logic controller also covered in this paper where the main advantage of NNPC is the fastest system response on depth control

Model-Based Design (MBD) For Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

This project is to enhanced and upgraded a depth controller for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) to submerge precisely at the certain depth. This poster demonstrated an AUV equipped with integrated sensor and depth controller based on the pressure sensing which able to continuously sending the depth data to controller. The depth Simulink Arduino algorithm is implemented on an Arduino Mega using ModelBased Design (MBD) with MATLAB and Simulink. MBD used to model, simulate and verify the Simulink control algorithm after obtained data through open-loop experiment test. Then, it deploys and tests the algorithm on the embedded AUV hardware. The focus was in controlling the AUV vertical trajectory as the AUV tried to remain stationary at the selected depth and consuming its rise time Tr, overshoot Os, and settling time Ts are minimized. The comparative study for the AUV depth-control by On-Off, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) controllers. MBD has faster implementation with fewer coding error when deploy to AUV hardware