2,560 research outputs found
A Novel ILP Framework for Summarizing Content with High Lexical Variety
Summarizing content contributed by individuals can be challenging, because
people make different lexical choices even when describing the same events.
However, there remains a significant need to summarize such content. Examples
include the student responses to post-class reflective questions, product
reviews, and news articles published by different news agencies related to the
same events. High lexical diversity of these documents hinders the system's
ability to effectively identify salient content and reduce summary redundancy.
In this paper, we overcome this issue by introducing an integer linear
programming-based summarization framework. It incorporates a low-rank
approximation to the sentence-word co-occurrence matrix to intrinsically group
semantically-similar lexical items. We conduct extensive experiments on
datasets of student responses, product reviews, and news documents. Our
approach compares favorably to a number of extractive baselines as well as a
neural abstractive summarization system. The paper finally sheds light on when
and why the proposed framework is effective at summarizing content with high
lexical variety.Comment: Accepted for publication in the journal of Natural Language
Engineering, 201
Learning to Extract Keyphrases from Text
Many academic journals ask their authors to provide a list of about five to fifteen key words, to appear on the first page of each article. Since these key words are often phrases of two or more words, we prefer to call them keyphrases. There is a surprisingly wide variety of tasks for which keyphrases are useful, as we discuss in this paper. Recent commercial software, such as Microsoft?s Word 97 and Verity?s Search 97, includes algorithms that automatically extract keyphrases from documents. In this paper, we approach the problem of automatically extracting keyphrases from text as a supervised learning task. We treat a document as a set of phrases, which the learning algorithm must learn to classify as positive or negative examples of keyphrases. Our first set of experiments applies the C4.5 decision tree induction algorithm to this learning task. The second set of experiments applies the GenEx algorithm to the task. We developed the GenEx algorithm specifically for this task. The third set of experiments examines the performance of GenEx on the task of metadata generation, relative to the performance of Microsoft?s Word 97. The fourth and final set of experiments investigates the performance of GenEx on the task of highlighting, relative to Verity?s Search 97. The experimental results support the claim that a specialized learning algorithm (GenEx) can generate better keyphrases than a general-purpose learning algorithm (C4.5) and the non-learning algorithms that are used in commercial software (Word 97 and Search 97)
- …