XSS-FP: Browser Fingerprinting using HTML Parser Quirks

There are many scenarios in which inferring the type of a client browser is desirable, for instance to fight against session stealing. This is known as browser fingerprinting. This paper presents and evaluates a novel fingerprinting technique to determine the exact nature (browser type and version, eg Firefox 15) of a web-browser, exploiting HTML parser quirks exercised through XSS. Our experiments show that the exact version of a web browser can be determined with 71% of accuracy, and that only 6 tests are sufficient to quickly determine the exact family a web browser belongs to

MDFRCNN: Malware Detection using Faster Region Proposals Convolution Neural Network

Technological advancement of smart devices has opened up a new trend: Internet of Everything (IoE), where all devices are connected to the web. Large scale networking benefits the community by increasing connectivity and giving control of physical devices. On the other hand, there exists an increased ‘Threat’ of an ‘Attack’. Attackers are targeting these devices, as it may provide an easier ‘backdoor entry to the users’ network’.MALicious softWARE (MalWare) is a major threat to user security. Fast and accurate detection of malware attacks are the sine qua non of IoE, where large scale networking is involved. The paper proposes use of a visualization technique where the disassembled malware code is converted into gray images, as well as use of Image Similarity based Statistical Parameters (ISSP) such as Normalized Cross correlation (NCC), Average difference (AD), Maximum difference (MaxD), Singular Structural Similarity Index Module (SSIM), Laplacian Mean Square Error (LMSE), MSE and PSNR. A vector consisting of gray image with statistical parameters is trained using a Faster Region proposals Convolution Neural Network (F-RCNN) classifier. The experiment results are promising as the proposed method includes ISSP with F-RCNN training. Overall training time of learning the semantics of higher-level malicious behaviors is less. Identification of malware (testing phase) is also performed in less time. The fusion of image and statistical parameter enhances system performance with greater accuracy. The benchmark database from Microsoft Malware Classification challenge has been used to analyze system performance, which is available on the Kaggle website. An overall average classification accuracy of 98.12% is achieved by the proposed method

Automatic Malware Detection

The problem of automatic malware detection presents challenges for antivirus vendors. Since the manual investigation is not possible due to the massive number of samples being submitted every day, automatic malware classication is necessary. Our work is focused on an automatic malware detection framework based on machine learning algorithms. We proposed several static malware detection systems for the Windows operating system to achieve the primary goal of distinguishing between malware and benign software. We also considered the more practical goal of detecting as much malware as possible while maintaining a suciently low false positive rate. We proposed several malware detection systems using various machine learning techniques, such as ensemble classier, recurrent neural network, and distance metric learning. We designed architectures of the proposed detection systems, which are automatic in the sense that extraction of features, preprocessing, training, and evaluating the detection model can be automated. However, antivirus program relies on more complex system that consists of many components where several of them depends on malware analysts and researchers. Malware authors adapt their malicious programs frequently in order to bypass antivirus programs that are regularly updated. Our proposed detection systems are not automatic in the sense that they are not able to automatically adapt to detect the newest malware. However, we can partly solve this problem by running our proposed systems again if the training set contains the newest malware. Our work relied on static analysis only. In this thesis, we discuss advantages and drawbacks in comparison to dynamic analysis. Static analysis still plays an important role, and it is used as one component of a complex detection system.The problem of automatic malware detection presents challenges for antivirus vendors. Since the manual investigation is not possible due to the massive number of samples being submitted every day, automatic malware classication is necessary. Our work is focused on an automatic malware detection framework based on machine learning algorithms. We proposed several static malware detection systems for the Windows operating system to achieve the primary goal of distinguishing between malware and benign software. We also considered the more practical goal of detecting as much malware as possible while maintaining a suciently low false positive rate. We proposed several malware detection systems using various machine learning techniques, such as ensemble classier, recurrent neural network, and distance metric learning. We designed architectures of the proposed detection systems, which are automatic in the sense that extraction of features, preprocessing, training, and evaluating the detection model can be automated. However, antivirus program relies on more complex system that consists of many components where several of them depends on malware analysts and researchers. Malware authors adapt their malicious programs frequently in order to bypass antivirus programs that are regularly updated. Our proposed detection systems are not automatic in the sense that they are not able to automatically adapt to detect the newest malware. However, we can partly solve this problem by running our proposed systems again if the training set contains the newest malware. Our work relied on static analysis only. In this thesis, we discuss advantages and drawbacks in comparison to dynamic analysis. Static analysis still plays an important role, and it is used as one component of a complex detection system

Feature Selection on Permissions, Intents and APIs for Android Malware Detection

Malicious applications pose an enormous security threat to mobile computing devices. Currently 85% of all smartphones run Android, Google’s open-source operating system, making that platform the primary threat vector for malware attacks. Android is a platform that hosts roughly 99% of known malware to date, and is the focus of most research efforts in mobile malware detection due to its open source nature. One of the main tools used in this effort is supervised machine learning. While a decade of work has made a lot of progress in detection accuracy, there is an obstacle that each stream of research is forced to overcome, feature selection, i.e., determining which attributes of Android are most effective as inputs into machine learning models. This dissertation aims to address that problem by providing the community with an exhaustive analysis of the three primary types of Android features used by researchers: Permissions, Intents and API Calls. The intent of the report is not to describe a best performing feature set or a best performing machine learning model, nor to explain why certain Permissions, Intents or API Calls get selected above others, but rather to provide a holistic methodology to help guide feature selection for Android malware detection. The experiments used eleven different feature selection techniques covering filter methods, wrapper methods and embedded methods. Each feature selection technique was applied to seven different datasets based on the seven combinations available of Permissions, Intents and API Calls. Each of those seven datasets are from a base set of 119k Android apps. All of the result sets were then validated against three different machine learning models, Random Forest, SVM and a Neural Net, to test applicability across algorithm type. The experiments show that using a combination of Permissions, Intents and API Calls produced higher accuracy than using any of those alone or in any other combination and that feature selection should be performed on the combined dataset, not by feature type and then combined. The data also shows that, in general, a feature set size of 200 or more attributes is required for optimal results. Finally, the feature selection methods Relief, Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) using a Neural Net are not satisfactory approaches for Android malware detection work. Based on the proposed methodology and experiments, this research provided insights into feature selection – a significant but often overlooked issue in Android malware detection. We believe the results reported herein is an important step for effective feature evaluation and selection in assisting malware detection especially for datasets with a large number of features. The methodology also has the potential to be applied to similar malware detection tasks or even in broader domains such as pattern recognition

Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Malware Analysis

Coping with malware is getting more and more challenging, given their relentless growth in complexity and volume. One of the most common approaches in literature is using machine learning techniques, to automatically learn models and patterns behind such complexity, and to develop technologies for keeping pace with the speed of development of novel malware. This survey aims at providing an overview on the way machine learning has been used so far in the context of malware analysis. We systematize surveyed papers according to their objectives (i.e., the expected output, what the analysis aims to), what information about malware they specifically use (i.e., the features), and what machine learning techniques they employ (i.e., what algorithm is used to process the input and produce the output). We also outline a number of problems concerning the datasets used in considered works, and finally introduce the novel concept of malware analysis economics, regarding the study of existing tradeoffs among key metrics, such as analysis accuracy and economical costs