Evaluating the more suitable ISM frequency band for iot-based smart grids: a quantitative study of 915 MHz vs. 2400 MHz

IoT has begun to be employed pervasively in industrial environments and critical infrastructures thanks to its positive impact on performance and efficiency. Among these environments, the Smart Grid (SG) excels as the perfect host for this technology, mainly due to its potential to become the motor of the rest of electrically-dependent infrastructures. To make this SG-oriented IoT cost-effective, most deployments employ unlicensed ISM bands, specifically the 2400 MHz one, due to its extended communication bandwidth in comparison with lower bands. This band has been extensively used for years by Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET), from which the IoT technologically inherits. However, this work questions and evaluates the suitability of such a "default" communication band in SG environments, compared with the 915 MHz ISM band. A comprehensive quantitative comparison of these bands has been accomplished in terms of: power consumption, average network delay, and packet reception rate. To allow such a study, a dual-band propagation model specifically designed for the SG has been derived, tested, and incorporated into the well-known TOSSIM simulator. Simulation results reveal that only in the absence of other 2400 MHz interfering devices (such as WiFi or Bluetooth) or in small networks, is the 2400 MHz band the best option. In any other case, SG-oriented IoT quantitatively perform better if operating in the 915 MHz band.This research was supported by the MINECO/FEDER project grants TEC2013-47016-C2-2-R (COINS) and TEC2016-76465-C2-1-R (AIM). The authors would like to thank Juan Salvador Perez Madrid nd Domingo Meca (part of the Iberdrola staff) for the support provided during the realization of this work. Ruben M. Sandoval also thanks the Spanish MICINN for an FPU (REF FPU14/03424) pre-doctoral fellowship

RPL Cross-Layer Scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 IoT Devices With Adjustable Transmit Power

Article number 9523554We propose a novel cross-layer scheme to reduce energy consumption in wireless sensor networks composed of IEEE 802.15.4 IoT devices with adjustable transmit power. Our approach is based on the IETF’s Routing Protocol for Low power and lossy networks (RPL). Nodes discover neighbors and keep fresh link statistics for each available transmit power level. Using the product of ETX and local transmit power level as a single metric, each node selects both the parent that minimizes the energy for packet transmission along the path to the root and the optimal local transmit power to be used. We have implemented our cross-layer scheme in NG-Contiki using the Z1 mote and two transmit power levels (55mW and 31mW). Simulations of a network of 15 motes show that (on average) 66% of nodes selected the low-power setting in a 25 m × 25 m area. As a result, we obtained an average reduction of 25% of the energy spent on transmission and reception of packets compared to the standard RPL settings where all nodes use the same transmit power level. In large scenarios (e.g., 150 m × 150 m and 40-100 motes), our approach provides better results in dense networks where reducing the transmit power of nodes does not translate into longer paths to the root nor degraded quality of service

Securing name resolution in the IoT: DNS over CoAP

In this paper, we present the design, implementation, and analysis of DNS over CoAP (DoC), a new proposal for secure and privacy-friendly name resolution of constrained IoT devices. We implement different design choices of DoC in RIOT, an open-source operating system for the IoT, evaluate performance measures in a testbed, compare with DNS over UDP and DNS over DTLS, and validate our protocol design based on empirical DNS IoT data. Our findings indicate that plain DoC is on par with common DNS solutions for the constrained IoT but significantly outperforms when additional, CoAP standard features are used such as block-wise transfer or caching. With OSCORE for end-to-end security, we can save more than 10 kBytes of code memory compared to DTLS while enabling group communication without compromising the trust chain when using intermediate proxies or caches. We also discuss a scheme for very restricted links that compresses redundant or excessive information by up to 70%.Comment: 12 pages, 13 figures, 4 table

Internet of Things: A Model for Cybersecurity Standards and the Categorisation of Devices

The networking of physical devices, including their infrastructure and data, is known as the Internet of Things. The number of networked devices is con- stantly increasing over the last years and is expected to continue to rise in the future. This also results in an increasing number of attacks on these devices which are considered potentially insecure. The reasons for the lack of cyber- security are diverse and lead, for example, to botnets and similar problems. Mandatory standards and guidelines can help to ensure cybersecurity re- gardless of a fast pace of development and a low price of the devices. In some areas, the development of these guidelines is already well advanced, ideally across countries as a European standard. However, problems with standardiza- tion are the different definitions of device categories and thus, the assignment of a device to a standard. Even in academia, definitions and categories for Internet of Things devices are ambiguous or completely lacking. This makes it difficult to find relevant publications. Therefore, a model of the Internet of Things was researched to solve these problems and define clear categories. The model divides the Internet of Things into categories, supplements the definitions with characteristics and distinguishes the different device types. The architectures and associated components are also considered. The model can be applied to all devices and available cybersecurity standards which is shown by mapping them to the model. The real-world applications are diverse and illustrated as different use cases. As digitalization evolves rapidly, the researched model is designed to adapt flexibly to new developments

Fog Protocol and FogKit: A JSON-Based Protocol and Framework for Communication Between Bluetooth-Enabled Wearable Internet of Things Devices

Advancements in technology have brought about a wide variety of devices, such as embedded devices with sensors and actuators, personal computers, smart devices, and health devices. Many of these devices are categorized as “wearables,” meaning that they are intended to be carried and used on one’s body. As this category increases in popularity and functionality, developers will need a convenient way for these devices to communicate with each other and store information in a standardized and ecient manner. The Fog protocol and FogKit framework developed and demonstrated for this thesis address these issues by providing a set of powerful features, including data posting, data querying, event notifications, and network status requests. These features are defined as convenient JSON formatted messages which can be communicated between Bluetooth peripherals using an iOS device running FogKit as router and server

Security and blockchain convergence with internet of multimedia things : current trends, research challenges and future directions

The Internet of Multimedia Things (IoMT) orchestration enables the integration of systems, software, cloud, and smart sensors into a single platform. The IoMT deals with scalar as well as multimedia data. In these networks, sensor-embedded devices and their data face numerous challenges when it comes to security. In this paper, a comprehensive review of the existing literature for IoMT is presented in the context of security and blockchain. The latest literature on all three aspects of security, i.e., authentication, privacy, and trust is provided to explore the challenges experienced by multimedia data. The convergence of blockchain and IoMT along with multimedia-enabled blockchain platforms are discussed for emerging applications. To highlight the significance of this survey, large-scale commercial projects focused on security and blockchain for multimedia applications are reviewed. The shortcomings of these projects are explored and suggestions for further improvement are provided. Based on the aforementioned discussion, we present our own case study for healthcare industry: a theoretical framework having security and blockchain as key enablers. The case study reflects the importance of security and blockchain in multimedia applications of healthcare sector. Finally, we discuss the convergence of emerging technologies with security, blockchain and IoMT to visualize the future of tomorrow's applications. © 2020 Elsevier Lt

RFC9031: Constrained Join Protocol (CoJP) for 6TiSCH

International audienceThis document describes the minimal framework required for a new device, called a "pledge", to securely join a 6TiSCH (IPv6 over the Time-Slotted Channel Hopping mode of IEEE 802.15.4) network. The framework requires that the pledge and the JRC (Join Registrar/Coordinator, a central entity), share a symmetric key. How this key is provisioned is out of scope of this document. Through a single CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) request-response exchange secured by OSCORE (Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments), the pledge requests admission into the network, and the JRC configures it with link-layer keying material and other parameters. The JRC may at any time update the parameters through another request-response exchange secured by OSCORE. This specification defines the Constrained Join Protocol and its CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) data structures, and it describes how to configure the rest of the 6TiSCH communication stack for this join process to occur in a secure manner. Additional security mechanisms may be added on top of this minimal framework

Demystifying Internet of Things Security

Break down the misconceptions of the Internet of Things by examining the different security building blocks available in Intel Architecture (IA) based IoT platforms. This open access book reviews the threat pyramid, secure boot, chain of trust, and the SW stack leading up to defense-in-depth. The IoT presents unique challenges in implementing security and Intel has both CPU and Isolated Security Engine capabilities to simplify it. This book explores the challenges to secure these devices to make them immune to different threats originating from within and outside the network. The requirements and robustness rules to protect the assets vary greatly and there is no single blanket solution approach to implement security. Demystifying Internet of Things Security provides clarity to industry professionals and provides and overview of different security solutions What You'll Learn Secure devices, immunizing them against different threats originating from inside and outside the network Gather an overview of the different security building blocks available in Intel Architecture (IA) based IoT platforms Understand the threat pyramid, secure boot, chain of trust, and the software stack leading up to defense-in-depth Who This Book Is For Strategists, developers, architects, and managers in the embedded and Internet of Things (IoT) space trying to understand and implement the security in the IoT devices/platforms

LTE-LAA 성능 향상을 위한 MAC 계층 기법

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 공과대학 전기·컴퓨터공학부, 2019. 2. 최성현.3GPP long term evolution (LTE) operation in unlicensed spectrum is emerging as a promising technology in achieving higher data rate with LTE since ultra-wide unlicensed spectrum, e.g., about 500 MHz at 5–6 GHz range, is available in most countries. Recently, 3GPP has finalized standardization of licensed-assisted access (LAA) for LTE operation in 5 GHz unlicensed spectrum, which has been a playground only for Wi-Fi. In this dissertation, we propose the following three strategies to enhance the performance of LAA: (1) Receiver-aware COT adaptation, (2) Collision-aware link adaptation, and (3) Power and energy detection threshold adaptation. First, LAA has a fixed maximum channel occupancy time (MCOT), which is the maximum continuous transmission time after channel sensing, while Wi-Fi may transmit for much shorter time duration. As a result, when Wi-Fi coexists with LAA, Wi-Fi airtime and throughput can be much less than those achieved when Wi-Fi coexists with another Wi-Fi. To guarantee fair airtime and improve throughput of Wi-Fi, we propose a receiver-aware channel occupancy time (COT) adaptation ( RACOTA ) algorithm, which observes Wi-Fi aggregate MAC protocol data unit (A-MPDU) frames and matches LAAs COT to the duration of A-MPDU frames when any Wi-Fi receiver has more data to receive. Moreover, RACOTA detects saturation of Wi-Fi traffic and adjusts COT only if Wi-Fi traffic is saturated. We prototype saturation detection algorithm of RACOTA with commercial off-the-shelf Wi-Fi device and show that RACOTA detects saturation of Wi-Fi networks accurately. Through ns-3 simulations, we demonstrate that RACOTA provides airtime fairness between LAA and Wi-Fi while achieves up to 334% Wi-Fi throughput gain. Second, the link adaptation scheme of the conventional LTE, adaptive modulation and coding (AMC), cannot operate well in the unlicensed band due to intermittent collisions. Intermittent collisions make LAA eNB lower modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for the subsequent transmission and such unnecessarily lowered MCS significantly degrades spectral efficiency. To address this problem, we propose a collision-aware link adaptation algorithm ( COALA ). COALA exploits k-means unsupervised clustering algorithm to discriminate channel quality indicator (CQI) reports which are measured with collision interference and selects the most suitable MCS for the next transmission. By prototype-based experiments, we demonstrate that COALA detects collisions accurately, and by conducting ns-3 simulations in various scenarios, we also show that COALA achieves up to 74.9% higher user perceived throughput than AMC. Finally, we propose PETAL to mitigate the negative impact of spatial reuse (SR) operation. We first design the baseline algorithm, which operates SR aggressively, and show that the baseline algorithm degrades the throughput performance severely when the UE is close to an interferer. Our proposed algorithm PETAL estimates and compares the spectral efficiency for the SR operation and non-SR operation. Then, PETAL operates SR only if the spectral efficiency of SR operation is expected to be higher than the case of non-SR operation. Our simulation verifies the performance of PETAL in various scenarios. When two pair of an eNB and a UE coexists, PETAL improves the throughput by up to 329% over the baseline algorithm. In summary, we identify interesting problems that appeared with LAA and shows the impact of the problems through the extensive simulations and propose compelling algorithms to solve the problems. The airtime fairness between Wi-Fi and LAA is improved with COT adaptation. Furthermore, link adaptation accuracy and SR operation are improved by exploiting CQI reports history. The performance of the proposed schemes is verified by system level simulation.비면허 대역에서의 LTE 동작은 더 높은 데이터 전송률을 달성하는 유망한 기술로 부각되고 있다. 최근 3GPP는 기존 Wi-Fi 기술이 사용하던 5 GHz 비면허 대역에서 LTE를 사용하는 licensed-assisted access (LAA) 기술의 표준화를 완료하였다. 본 논문에서 우리는 LAA의 성능을 향상시키기 위해 다음과 같은 세 가지 전략을 제안한다: (1) 수신기 인식 채널 점유 시간 적응, (2) 충돌 인식 링크 적응, (3) 전력 및 에너지 검출 역치 적응. 첫째, LAA는 고정된 최대 채널 점유 시간을 가지고 있고 그 시간 만큼 연속적으로 전송할 수 있는 반면, Wi-Fi는 비교적 짧은 시간 동안만 연속적으로 전송할 수 있다. 그 결과 Wi-Fi가 LAA와 공존할 때 Wi-Fi의 airtime과 수율 성능은 Wi-Fi가 또 다른 Wi-Fi와 공존할 때에 비하여 저하되게된다. 따라서 우리는 Wi-Fi의 airtime과 수율 성능을 향상시키기 위하여 Wi-Fi의 A-MPDU 프레임 전송 시간에 맞추어 LAA의 채널 점유 시간을 조절하는 수신기 인식 채널 점유 시간 적응 기법인 RACOTA를 제안한다. RACOTA 는 포화 감지 결과 Wi-Fi 수신기가 더 받을 데이터가 있다고 판단될 때에만 채널 점유 시간을 조절한다. 우리는 RACOTA 의 포화 감지 알고리즘을 상용 Wi-Fi 장비에 구현하여 이를 바탕으로 실측을 통해 RACOTA 가 공존하는 Wi-Fi의 포화 여부를 정확하게 감지해냄을 보인다. 또한 우리는 ns-3 시뮬레이션을 통하여 RACOTA 를 사용하는 LAA가 공존하는 Wi-Fi에게 공정한 airtime을 제공하고 기존 LAA와 공존하는 Wi-Fi 대비 최대 334%의 Wi-Fi 수율 성능 향상을 가져옴을 보인다. 둘째, 간헐적인 충돌이 발생할 수 있는 비면허 대역에서는 기존 LTE의 링크 적응 기법인 adaptive modulation and coding (AMC)이 잘 동작하지 않을 수 있다. 간헐적인 충돌은 LAA 기지국으로 하여금 modulation and coding scheme (MCS)을 낮추어서 다음 전송을 하도록 하는데 다음 전송 시에 충돌이 발생하지 않는다면 불필요하게 낮춘 MCS로 인해 주파수 효율이 크게 저하된다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기위해 우리는 충돌 인식 링크 적응 기법인 COALA 를 제안한다. COALA 는 k-means 무감독 클러스터링 알고리즘을 사용하여 channel quality indicator (CQI) 리포트 중 충돌 간섭에 영향을 받은 CQI 리포트들을 구별해내고 이를 통해 다음 전송을 위한 최적의 MCS를 선택한다. 우리는 실측을 통하여 COALA 가 정확하게 충돌을 감지해냄을 보인다. 또한 우리는 다양한 환경에서의 ns-3 시뮬레이션을 통하여 COALA 가 AMC 대비 최대 74.9%의 사용자 인식 수율 성능 향상을 가져옴을 보인다. 셋째, 우리는 공간 재사용 동작의 부작용을 최소화하기 위하여 수신 단말을 고려하여 전송 파워 및 에너지 검출 역치를 적응적으로 조절하는 PETAL 알고리즘을 제안한다. 우리는 먼저 수신 단말을 고려하지 않고 공격적으로 공간 재사용 동작을 하는 baseline 알고리즘을 설계하고 다양한 환경에서의 시뮬레이션을 통하여 수신 단말이 간섭원에 가까운 경우 baseline 알고리즘의 성능이 심각하게 열화됨을 보인다. 제안하는 알고리즘인 PETAL 은 수신 단말로부터 받은 CQI 리포트 정보와 채널 점유 시점까지의 평균 대기 시간을 이용하여 공간 재사용 동작을 할 때 예상되는 주파수 효율과 공간 재사용 동작을 하지 않을 때 예상되는 주파수 효율을 비교하여 공간 재사용 동작을 할 때 예상되는 주파수 효율이 더 클 때에만 공간 재사용 동작을 한다. 우리는 다양한 환경에서의 ns-3 시뮬레이션을 통하여 PETAL 이 baseline 알고리즘 대비 최대 329%의 수율 성능 향상을 가져옴을 보인다. 요약하자면, 우리는 LAA의 등장과 함께 새롭게 대두되는 흥미로운 문제들을 확인하고 문제들의 심각성을 다양한 환경에서의 시뮬레이션을 통하여 살펴보고 이 러한 문제들을 해결할 수 있는 알고리즘들을 제안한다. Wi-Fi와 LAA 사이의 airtime 공정성은 LAA의 연속 전송 시간을 적응적으로 조절하여 개선할 수 있다. 또한 링크 적응 정확도와 공간 재사용 동작의 효율성은 CQI 리포트들의 분포를 이용하여 개선할 수 있다. 제안하는 알고리즘들의 성능은 시스템 레벨 시뮬레이션을 통하여 검증되었다.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Overview of Existing Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Main Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3.1 RACOTA: Receiver-Aware Channel Occupancy Time Adaptation for LTE-LAA . . . . . . . 2 1.3.2 COALA: Collision-Aware Link Adaptation for LTE-LAA . . 3 1.3.3 PETAL: Power and Energy Detection Threshold Adaptation for LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4 Organization of the Dissertation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 RACOTA:Receiver-AwareChannelOccupancyTimeAdaptationforLTE- LAA 6 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3 MAC Mechanisms of Wi-Fi and LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.1 Wi-Fi MAC Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.2 LAA Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3.3 Wide Bandwidth Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 Coexistence performance of LAA and Wi-Fi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.4.1 Simulation Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.4.2 Unfairness between LAA and Wi-Fi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.5 Receiver-Aware COT Adaptation Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.5.1 Saturation Detection (SD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.5.2 Receiver-Aware COT Decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.6 Performance Evaluation of SD Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.6.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.6.2 PPDUMaxTime Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.6.3 Saturation Detection Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.7 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.7.1 Saturated Traffic Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.7.2 Unsaturated Traffic Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.7.3 Bursty Traffic Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.7.4 Heterogeneous Wi-Fi Traffic Generation Scenario . . . . . . 31 2.7.5 Multiple Node Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.8 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3 COALA: Collision-Aware Link Adaptation for LTE-LAA 36 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2 Backgound and Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2.1 LAA and LBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2.2 AMC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.2.3 Inter-Cell Interference Cancellation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.2.4 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.3 Impact of Collision to Link Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.4 COALA: Collision-aware Link Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4.1 CQI Clustering Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.4.2 Collision Detection and Collision Probability Estimation . . . 48 3.4.3 Suitable MCS Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.5 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.5.1 Prototype-based Feasibility Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.5.2 Contention Collision with LAA eNBs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.5.3 Hidden Collision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.5.4 Bursty Hidden Collision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.5.5 Contention Collision with Wi-Fi Transmitters . . . . . . . . . 58 3.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4 PETAL: Power and Energy Detection Threshold Adaptation for LAA 62 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2 Backgound and Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2.1 Energy Detection Threshold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.3 Baseline Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 4.3.1 Design of the Baseline Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 4.3.2 Performance of the Baseline Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.4 PETAL: Power and Energy Detection Threshold Adaptation . . . . . 68 4.4.1 CQI Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.4.2 Success Probability and Airtime Ratio Estimation . . . . . . . 69 4.4.3 CQI Clustering Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.4.4 SR Decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.5 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.5.1 Two Cell Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 4.5.2 Coexistence with Standard LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.5.3 Four Cell Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 4.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5 Concluding Remarks 79 5.1 Research Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Abstract (In Korean) 88 감사의 글 92Docto