Decidability of the interval temporal logic ABBar over the natural numbers

In this paper, we focus our attention on the interval temporal logic of the Allen's relations "meets", "begins", and "begun by" (ABBar for short), interpreted over natural numbers. We first introduce the logic and we show that it is expressive enough to model distinctive interval properties,such as accomplishment conditions, to capture basic modalities of point-based temporal logic, such as the until operator, and to encode relevant metric constraints. Then, we prove that the satisfiability problem for ABBar over natural numbers is decidable by providing a small model theorem based on an original contraction method. Finally, we prove the EXPSPACE-completeness of the proble

A decidable weakening of Compass Logic based on cone-shaped cardinal directions

We introduce a modal logic, called Cone Logic, whose formulas describe properties of points in the plane and spatial relationships between them. Points are labelled by proposition letters and spatial relations are induced by the four cone-shaped cardinal directions. Cone Logic can be seen as a weakening of Venema's Compass Logic. We prove that, unlike Compass Logic and other projection-based spatial logics, its satisfiability problem is decidable (precisely, PSPACE-complete). We also show that it is expressive enough to capture meaningful interval temporal logics - in particular, the interval temporal logic of Allen's relations "Begins", "During", and "Later", and their transposes

Modal Logics of Topological Relations

Logical formalisms for reasoning about relations between spatial regions play a fundamental role in geographical information systems, spatial and constraint databases, and spatial reasoning in AI. In analogy with Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals based on the Allen relations, we introduce a family of modal logics equipped with eight modal operators that are interpreted by the Egenhofer-Franzosa (or RCC8) relations between regions in topological spaces such as the real plane. We investigate the expressive power and computational complexity of logics obtained in this way. It turns out that our modal logics have the same expressive power as the two-variable fragment of first-order logic, but are exponentially less succinct. The complexity ranges from (undecidable and) recursively enumerable to highly undecidable, where the recursively enumerable logics are obtained by considering substructures of structures induced by topological spaces. As our undecidability results also capture logics based on the real line, they improve upon undecidability results for interval temporal logics by Halpern and Shoham. We also analyze modal logics based on the five RCC5 relations, with similar results regarding the expressive power, but weaker results regarding the complexity

Crossing the Undecidability Border with Extensions of Propositional Neighborhood Logic over Natural Numbers

Propositional Neighborhood Logic (PNL) is an interval temporal logic featuring two modalities corresponding to the relations of right and left neighborhood between two intervals on a linear order (in terms of Allen's relations, meets and met by). Recently, it has been shown that PNL interpreted over several classes of linear orders, including natural numbers, is decidable (NEXPTIME-complete) and that some of its natural extensions preserve decidability. Most notably, this is the case with PNL over natural numbers extended with a limited form of metric constraints and with the future fragment of PNL extended with modal operators corresponding to Allen's relations begins, begun by, and before. This paper aims at demonstrating that PNL and its metric version MPNL, interpreted over natural numbers, are indeed very close to the border with undecidability, and even relatively weak extensions of them become undecidable. In particular, we show that (i) the addition of binders on integer variables ranging over interval lengths makes the resulting hybrid extension of MPNL undecidable, and (ii) a very weak first-order extension of the future fragment of PNL, obtained by replacing proposition letters by a restricted subclass of first-order formulae where only one variable is allowed, is undecidable (in contrast with the decidability of similar first-order extensions of point-based temporal logics)

Complexity of ITL model checking: some well-behaved fragments of the interval logic HS

Model checking has been successfully used in many computer science fields, including artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, and databases. Most of the proposed solutions make use of classical, point-based temporal logics, while little work has been done in the interval temporal logic setting. Recently, a non-elementary model checking algorithm for Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals HS over finite Kripke structures (under the homogeneity assumption) and an EXPSPACE model checking procedure for two meaningful fragments of it have been proposed. In this paper, we show that more efficient model checking procedures can be developed for some expressive enough fragments of HS

Maximal decidable fragments of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of intervals

In this paper, we focus our attention on the fragment of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of intervals (HS) that features four modal operators corresponding to the relations ``meets'', ``met by'', ``begun by'', and ``begins'' of Allen's interval algebra (AAbarBBbar logic). AAbarBBbar properly extends interesting interval temporal logics recently investigated in the literature, such as the logic BBbar of Allen's ``begun by/begins'' relations and propositional neighborhood logic AAbar, in its many variants (including metric ones). We prove that the satisfiability problem for AAbarBBbar, interpreted over finite linear orders, is decidable, but not primitive recursive (as a matter of fact, AAbarBBbar turns out to be maximal with respect to decidability). Then, we show that it becomes undecidable when AAbarBBbar is interpreted over classes of linear orders that contains at least one linear order with an infinitely ascending sequence, thus including the natural time flows N, Z, Q, and R

Maximal decidable fragments of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of intervals

In this paper, we focus our attention on the fragment of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of intervals (HS) that features four modal operators corresponding to the relations ``meets'', ``met by'', ``begun by'', and ``begins'' of Allen's interval algebra (AAbarBBbar logic). AAbarBBbar properly extends interesting interval temporal logics recently investigated in the literature, such as the logic BBbar of Allen's ``begun by/begins'' relations and propositional neighborhood logic AAbar, in its many variants (including metric ones). We prove that the satisfiability problem for AAbarBBbar, interpreted over finite linear orders, is decidable, but not primitive recursive (as a matter of fact, AAbarBBbar turns out to be maximal with respect to decidability). Then, we show that it becomes undecidable when AAbarBBbar is interpreted over classes of linear orders that contains at least one linear order with an infinitely ascending sequence, thus including the natural time flows N, Z, Q, and R