Partial Quantifier Elimination By Certificate Clauses

We study partial quantifier elimination (PQE) for propositional CNF formulas. In contrast to full quantifier elimination, in PQE, one can limit the set of clauses taken out of the scope of quantifiers to a small subset of target clauses. The appeal of PQE is twofold. First, PQE can be dramatically simpler than full quantifier elimination. Second, it provides a language for performing incremental computations. Many verification problems (e.g. equivalence checking and model checking) are inherently incremental and so can be solved in terms of PQE. Our approach is based on deriving clauses depending only on unquantified variables that make the target clauses $\mathit{redundant}$. Proving redundancy of a target clause is done by construction of a ``certificate'' clause implying the former. We describe a PQE algorithm called $\mathit{START}$ that employs the approach above. We apply $\mathit{START}$ to generating properties of a design implementation that are not implied by specification. The existence of an $\mathit{unwanted}$ property means that this implementation is buggy. Our experiments with HWMCC-13 benchmarks suggest that $\mathit{START}$ can be used for generating properties of real-life designs

Exponential separations using guarded extension variables

We study the complexity of proof systems augmenting resolution with inference rules that allow, given a formula $\Gamma$ in conjunctive normal form, deriving clauses that are not necessarily logically implied by $\Gamma$ but whose addition to $\Gamma$ preserves satisfiability. When the derived clauses are allowed to introduce variables not occurring in $\Gamma$, the systems we consider become equivalent to extended resolution. We are concerned with the versions of these systems without new variables. They are called BC${}^-$, RAT${}^-$, SBC${}^-$, and GER${}^-$, denoting respectively blocked clauses, resolution asymmetric tautologies, set-blocked clauses, and generalized extended resolution. Each of these systems formalizes some restricted version of the ability to make assumptions that hold "without loss of generality," which is commonly used informally to simplify or shorten proofs. Except for SBC${}^-$, these systems are known to be exponentially weaker than extended resolution. They are, however, all equivalent to it under a relaxed notion of simulation that allows the translation of the formula along with the proof when moving between proof systems. By taking advantage of this fact, we construct formulas that separate RAT${}^-$ from GER${}^-$ and vice versa. With the same strategy, we also separate SBC${}^-$ from RAT${}^-$. Additionally, we give polynomial-size SBC${}^-$ proofs of the pigeonhole principle, which separates SBC${}^-$ from GER${}^-$ by a previously known lower bound. These results also separate the three systems from BC${}^-$ since they all simulate it. We thus give an almost complete picture of their relative strengths

New methods for 3-SAT decision and worst-case analysis

We prove the worst-case upper bound 1:5045 n for the time complexity of 3-SAT decision, where n is the number of variables in the input formula, introducing new methods for the analysis as well as new algorithmic techniques. We add new 2- and 3-clauses, called "blocked clauses", generalizing the extension rule of "Extended Resolution." Our methods for estimating the size of trees lead to a refined measure of formula complexity of 3-clause-sets and can be applied also to arbitrary trees. Keywords: 3-SAT, worst-case upper bounds, analysis of algorithms, Extended Resolution, blocked clauses, generalized autarkness. 1 Introduction In this paper we study the exponential part of time complexity for 3-SAT decision and prove the worst-case upper bound 1:5044:: n for n the number of variables in the input formula, using new algorithmic methods as well as new methods for the analysis. These methods also deepen the already existing approaches in a systematically manner. The following results..