4,424 research outputs found
Formally based semi-automatic implementation of an open security protocol
International audienceThis paper presents an experiment in which an implementation of the client side of the SSH Transport Layer Protocol (SSH-TLP) was semi-automatically derived according to a model-driven development paradigm that leverages formal methods in order to obtain high correctness assurance. The approach used in the experiment starts with the formalization of the protocol at an abstract level. This model is then formally proved to fulfill the desired secrecy and authentication properties by using the ProVerif prover. Finally, a sound Java implementation is semi-automatically derived from the verified model using an enhanced version of the Spi2Java framework. The resulting implementation correctly interoperates with third party servers, and its execution time is comparable with that of other manually developed Java SSH-TLP client implementations. This case study demonstrates that the adopted model-driven approach is viable even for a real security protocol, despite the complexity of the models needed in order to achieve an interoperable implementation
Safe abstractions of data encodings in formal security protocol models
When using formal methods, security protocols are usually modeled at a high level of abstraction. In particular, data encoding and decoding transformations are often abstracted away. However, if no assumptions at all are made on the behavior of such transformations, they could trivially lead to security faults, for example leaking secrets or breaking freshness by collapsing nonces into constants. In order to address this issue, this paper formally states sufficient conditions, checkable on sequential code, such that if an abstract protocol model is secure under a Dolev-Yao adversary, then a refined model, which takes into account a wide class of possible implementations of the encoding/decoding operations, is implied to be secure too under the same adversary model. The paper also indicates possible exploitations of this result in the context of methods based on formal model extraction from implementation code and of methods based on automated code generation from formally verified model
A Formal TLS Handshake Model in LNT
Testing of network services represents one of the biggest challenges in cyber
security. Because new vulnerabilities are detected on a regular basis, more
research is needed. These faults have their roots in the software development
cycle or because of intrinsic leaks in the system specification. Conformance
testing checks whether a system behaves according to its specification. Here
model-based testing provides several methods for automated detection of
shortcomings. The formal specification of a system behavior represents the
starting point of the testing process. In this paper, a widely used
cryptographic protocol is specified and tested for conformance with a test
execution framework. The first empirical results are presented and discussed.Comment: In Proceedings MARS/VPT 2018, arXiv:1803.0866
Modelling and simulation of a biometric identity-based cryptography
Government information is a vital asset that must be kept in a trusted environment and efficiently managed by authorised parties. Even though e-Government provides a number of advantages, it also introduces a range of new security risks. Sharing confidential and top-secret information in a secure manner among government sectors tend to be the main element that government agencies look for. Thus, developing an effective methodology is essential and it is a key factor for e-Government success. The proposed e-Government scheme in this paper is a combination of identity-based encryption and biometric technology. This new scheme can effectively improve the security in authentication systems, which provides a reliable identity with a high degree of assurance. In addition, this paper demonstrates the feasibility of using Finite-state machines as a formal method to analyse the proposed protocols
KeyForge: Mitigating Email Breaches with Forward-Forgeable Signatures
Email breaches are commonplace, and they expose a wealth of personal,
business, and political data that may have devastating consequences. The
current email system allows any attacker who gains access to your email to
prove the authenticity of the stolen messages to third parties -- a property
arising from a necessary anti-spam / anti-spoofing protocol called DKIM. This
exacerbates the problem of email breaches by greatly increasing the potential
for attackers to damage the users' reputation, blackmail them, or sell the
stolen information to third parties.
In this paper, we introduce "non-attributable email", which guarantees that a
wide class of adversaries are unable to convince any third party of the
authenticity of stolen emails. We formally define non-attributability, and
present two practical system proposals -- KeyForge and TimeForge -- that
provably achieve non-attributability while maintaining the important protection
against spam and spoofing that is currently provided by DKIM. Moreover, we
implement KeyForge and demonstrate that that scheme is practical, achieving
competitive verification and signing speed while also requiring 42% less
bandwidth per email than RSA2048
- …