780 research outputs found

    Ramsey Theory Problems over the Integers: Avoiding Generalized Progressions

    Full text link
    Two well studied Ramsey-theoretic problems consider subsets of the natural numbers which either contain no three elements in arithmetic progression, or in geometric progression. We study generalizations of this problem, by varying the kinds of progressions to be avoided and the metrics used to evaluate the density of the resulting subsets. One can view a 3-term arithmetic progression as a sequence x,fn(x),fn(fn(x))x, f_n(x), f_n(f_n(x)), where fn(x)=x+nf_n(x) = x + n, nn a nonzero integer. Thus avoiding three-term arithmetic progressions is equivalent to containing no three elements of the form x,fn(x),fn(fn(x))x, f_n(x), f_n(f_n(x)) with fn∈Ftf_n \in\mathcal{F}_{\rm t}, the set of integer translations. One can similarly construct related progressions using different families of functions. We investigate several such families, including geometric progressions (fn(x)=nxf_n(x) = nx with n>1n > 1 a natural number) and exponential progressions (fn(x)=xnf_n(x) = x^n). Progression-free sets are often constructed "greedily," including every number so long as it is not in progression with any of the previous elements. Rankin characterized the greedy geometric-progression-free set in terms of the greedy arithmetic set. We characterize the greedy exponential set and prove that it has asymptotic density 1, and then discuss how the optimality of the greedy set depends on the family of functions used to define progressions. Traditionally, the size of a progression-free set is measured using the (upper) asymptotic density, however we consider several different notions of density, including the uniform and exponential densities.Comment: Version 1.0, 13 page

    On sets of integers which contain no three terms in geometric progression

    Full text link
    The problem of looking for subsets of the natural numbers which contain no 3-term arithmetic progressions has a rich history. Roth's theorem famously shows that any such subset cannot have positive upper density. In contrast, Rankin in 1960 suggested looking at subsets without three-term geometric progressions, and constructed such a subset with density about 0.719. More recently, several authors have found upper bounds for the upper density of such sets. We significantly improve upon these bounds, and demonstrate a method of constructing sets with a greater upper density than Rankin's set. This construction is optimal in the sense that our method gives a way of effectively computing the greatest possible upper density of a geometric-progression-free set. We also show that geometric progressions in Z/nZ behave more like Roth's theorem in that one cannot take any fixed positive proportion of the integers modulo a sufficiently large value of n while avoiding geometric progressions.Comment: 16 page

    Van der Waerden's Theorem and Avoidability in Words

    Full text link
    Pirillo and Varricchio, and independently, Halbeisen and Hungerbuhler considered the following problem, open since 1994: Does there exist an infinite word w over a finite subset of Z such that w contains no two consecutive blocks of the same length and sum? We consider some variations on this problem in the light of van der Waerden's theorem on arithmetic progressions.Comment: Co-author added; new result
    • …
    corecore