780 research outputs found
Ramsey Theory Problems over the Integers: Avoiding Generalized Progressions
Two well studied Ramsey-theoretic problems consider subsets of the natural
numbers which either contain no three elements in arithmetic progression, or in
geometric progression. We study generalizations of this problem, by varying the
kinds of progressions to be avoided and the metrics used to evaluate the
density of the resulting subsets. One can view a 3-term arithmetic progression
as a sequence , where , a nonzero
integer. Thus avoiding three-term arithmetic progressions is equivalent to
containing no three elements of the form with , the set of integer translations. One can similarly
construct related progressions using different families of functions. We
investigate several such families, including geometric progressions ( with a natural number) and exponential progressions ().
Progression-free sets are often constructed "greedily," including every
number so long as it is not in progression with any of the previous elements.
Rankin characterized the greedy geometric-progression-free set in terms of the
greedy arithmetic set. We characterize the greedy exponential set and prove
that it has asymptotic density 1, and then discuss how the optimality of the
greedy set depends on the family of functions used to define progressions.
Traditionally, the size of a progression-free set is measured using the (upper)
asymptotic density, however we consider several different notions of density,
including the uniform and exponential densities.Comment: Version 1.0, 13 page
On sets of integers which contain no three terms in geometric progression
The problem of looking for subsets of the natural numbers which contain no
3-term arithmetic progressions has a rich history. Roth's theorem famously
shows that any such subset cannot have positive upper density. In contrast,
Rankin in 1960 suggested looking at subsets without three-term geometric
progressions, and constructed such a subset with density about 0.719. More
recently, several authors have found upper bounds for the upper density of such
sets. We significantly improve upon these bounds, and demonstrate a method of
constructing sets with a greater upper density than Rankin's set. This
construction is optimal in the sense that our method gives a way of effectively
computing the greatest possible upper density of a geometric-progression-free
set. We also show that geometric progressions in Z/nZ behave more like Roth's
theorem in that one cannot take any fixed positive proportion of the integers
modulo a sufficiently large value of n while avoiding geometric progressions.Comment: 16 page
Van der Waerden's Theorem and Avoidability in Words
Pirillo and Varricchio, and independently, Halbeisen and Hungerbuhler
considered the following problem, open since 1994: Does there exist an infinite
word w over a finite subset of Z such that w contains no two consecutive blocks
of the same length and sum? We consider some variations on this problem in the
light of van der Waerden's theorem on arithmetic progressions.Comment: Co-author added; new result
- β¦