40 research outputs found
The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)
In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor
Segmentation Benchmark (LITS) organized in conjunction with the IEEE
International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016 and International
Conference On Medical Image Computing Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI)
2017. Twenty four valid state-of-the-art liver and liver tumor segmentation
algorithms were applied to a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes with
different types of tumor contrast levels (hyper-/hypo-intense), abnormalities
in tissues (metastasectomie) size and varying amount of lesions. The submitted
algorithms have been tested on 70 undisclosed volumes. The dataset is created
in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions and manually
reviewed by independent three radiologists. We found that not a single
algorithm performed best for liver and tumors. The best liver segmentation
algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.96(MICCAI) whereas for tumor segmentation
the best algorithm evaluated at 0.67(ISBI) and 0.70(MICCAI). The LITS image
data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online
evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.Comment: conferenc
Automated liver tissues delineation based on machine learning techniques: A survey, current trends and future orientations
There is no denying how machine learning and computer vision have grown in
the recent years. Their highest advantages lie within their automation,
suitability, and ability to generate astounding results in a matter of seconds
in a reproducible manner. This is aided by the ubiquitous advancements reached
in the computing capabilities of current graphical processing units and the
highly efficient implementation of such techniques. Hence, in this paper, we
survey the key studies that are published between 2014 and 2020, showcasing the
different machine learning algorithms researchers have used to segment the
liver, hepatic-tumors, and hepatic-vasculature structures. We divide the
surveyed studies based on the tissue of interest (hepatic-parenchyma,
hepatic-tumors, or hepatic-vessels), highlighting the studies that tackle more
than one task simultaneously. Additionally, the machine learning algorithms are
classified as either supervised or unsupervised, and further partitioned if the
amount of works that fall under a certain scheme is significant. Moreover,
different datasets and challenges found in literature and websites, containing
masks of the aforementioned tissues, are thoroughly discussed, highlighting the
organizers original contributions, and those of other researchers. Also, the
metrics that are used excessively in literature are mentioned in our review
stressing their relevancy to the task at hand. Finally, critical challenges and
future directions are emphasized for innovative researchers to tackle, exposing
gaps that need addressing such as the scarcity of many studies on the vessels
segmentation challenge, and why their absence needs to be dealt with in an
accelerated manner.Comment: 41 pages, 4 figures, 13 equations, 1 table. A review paper on liver
tissues segmentation based on automated ML-based technique