A conceptual framework for studying collective reactions to events in location-based social media

Events are a core concept of spatial information, but location-based social media (LBSM) provide information on reactions to events. Individuals have varied degrees of agency in initiating, reacting to or modifying the course of events, and reactions include observations of occurrence, expressions containing sentiment or emotions, or a call to action. Key characteristics of reactions include referent events and information about who reacted, when, where and how. Collective reactions are composed of multiple individual reactions sharing common referents. They can be characterized according to the following dimensions: spatial, temporal, social, thematic and interlinkage. We present a conceptual framework, which allows characterization and comparison of collective reactions. For a thematically well-defined class of event such as storms, we can explore differences and similarities in collective attribution of meaning across space and time. Other events may have very complex spatio-temporal signatures (e.g. political processes such as Brexit or elections), which can be decomposed into series of individual events (e.g. a temporal window around the result of a vote). The purpose of our framework is to explore ways in which collective reactions to events in LBSM can be described and underpin the development of methods for analysing and understanding collective reactions to events

Trustworthiness in Social Big Data Incorporating Semantic Analysis, Machine Learning and Distributed Data Processing

This thesis presents several state-of-the-art approaches constructed for the purpose of (i) studying the trustworthiness of users in Online Social Network platforms, (ii) deriving concealed knowledge from their textual content, and (iii) classifying and predicting the domain knowledge of users and their content. The developed approaches are refined through proof-of-concept experiments, several benchmark comparisons, and appropriate and rigorous evaluation metrics to verify and validate their effectiveness and efficiency, and hence, those of the applied frameworks

Novel approaches to anonymity and privacy in decentralized, open settings

The Internet has undergone dramatic changes in the last two decades, evolving from a mere communication network to a global multimedia platform in which billions of users actively exchange information. While this transformation has brought tremendous benefits to society, it has also created new threats to online privacy that existing technology is failing to keep pace with. In this dissertation, we present the results of two lines of research that developed two novel approaches to anonymity and privacy in decentralized, open settings. First, we examine the issue of attribute and identity disclosure in open settings and develop the novel notion of (k,d)-anonymity for open settings that we extensively study and validate experimentally. Furthermore, we investigate the relationship between anonymity and linkability using the notion of (k,d)-anonymity and show that, in contrast to the traditional closed setting, anonymity within one online community does necessarily imply unlinkability across different online communities in the decentralized, open setting. Secondly, we consider the transitive diffusion of information that is shared in social networks and spread through pairwise interactions of user connected in this social network. We develop the novel approach of exposure minimization to control the diffusion of information within an open network, allowing the owner to minimize its exposure by suitably choosing who they share their information with. We implement our algorithms and investigate the practical limitations of user side exposure minimization in large social networks. At their core, both of these approaches present a departure from the provable privacy guarantees that we can achieve in closed settings and a step towards sound assessments of privacy risks in decentralized, open settings.Das Internet hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten eine drastische Transformation erlebt und entwickelte sich dabei von einem einfachen Kommunikationsnetzwerk zu einer globalen Multimedia Plattform auf der Milliarden von Nutzern aktiv Informationen austauschen. Diese Transformation hat zwar einen gewaltigen Nutzen und vielfältige Vorteile für die Gesellschaft mit sich gebracht, hat aber gleichzeitig auch neue Herausforderungen und Gefahren für online Privacy mit sich gebracht mit der die aktuelle Technologie nicht mithalten kann. In dieser Dissertation präsentieren wir zwei neue Ansätze für Anonymität und Privacy in dezentralisierten und offenen Systemen. Mit unserem ersten Ansatz untersuchen wir das Problem der Attribut- und Identitätspreisgabe in offenen Netzwerken und entwickeln hierzu den Begriff der (k, d)-Anonymität für offene Systeme welchen wir extensiv analysieren und anschließend experimentell validieren. Zusätzlich untersuchen wir die Beziehung zwischen Anonymität und Unlinkability in offenen Systemen mithilfe des Begriff der (k, d)-Anonymität und zeigen, dass, im Gegensatz zu traditionell betrachteten, abgeschlossenen Systeme, Anonymität innerhalb einer Online Community nicht zwingend die Unlinkability zwischen verschiedenen Online Communitys impliziert. Mit unserem zweiten Ansatz untersuchen wir die transitive Diffusion von Information die in Sozialen Netzwerken geteilt wird und sich dann durch die paarweisen Interaktionen von Nutzern durch eben dieses Netzwerk ausbreitet. Wir entwickeln eine neue Methode zur Kontrolle der Ausbreitung dieser Information durch die Minimierung ihrer Exposure, was dem Besitzer dieser Information erlaubt zu kontrollieren wie weit sich deren Information ausbreitet indem diese initial mit einer sorgfältig gewählten Menge von Nutzern geteilt wird. Wir implementieren die hierzu entwickelten Algorithmen und untersuchen die praktischen Grenzen der Exposure Minimierung, wenn sie von Nutzerseite für große Netzwerke ausgeführt werden soll. Beide hier vorgestellten Ansätze verbindet eine Neuausrichtung der Aussagen die diese bezüglich Privacy treffen: wir bewegen uns weg von beweisbaren Privacy Garantien für abgeschlossene Systeme, und machen einen Schritt zu robusten Privacy Risikoeinschätzungen für dezentralisierte, offene Systeme in denen solche beweisbaren Garantien nicht möglich sind

A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering on Vision-Language Foundation Models

Prompt engineering is a technique that involves augmenting a large pre-trained model with task-specific hints, known as prompts, to adapt the model to new tasks. Prompts can be created manually as natural language instructions or generated automatically as either natural language instructions or vector representations. Prompt engineering enables the ability to perform predictions based solely on prompts without updating model parameters, and the easier application of large pre-trained models in real-world tasks. In past years, Prompt engineering has been well-studied in natural language processing. Recently, it has also been intensively studied in vision-language modeling. However, there is currently a lack of a systematic overview of prompt engineering on pre-trained vision-language models. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge research in prompt engineering on three types of vision-language models: multimodal-to-text generation models (e.g. Flamingo), image-text matching models (e.g. CLIP), and text-to-image generation models (e.g. Stable Diffusion). For each type of model, a brief model summary, prompting methods, prompting-based applications, and the corresponding responsibility and integrity issues are summarized and discussed. Furthermore, the commonalities and differences between prompting on vision-language models, language models, and vision models are also discussed. The challenges, future directions, and research opportunities are summarized to foster future research on this topic