Multilingual Twitter Sentiment Classification: The Role of Human Annotators

What are the limits of automated Twitter sentiment classification? We analyze a large set of manually labeled tweets in different languages, use them as training data, and construct automated classification models. It turns out that the quality of classification models depends much more on the quality and size of training data than on the type of the model trained. Experimental results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the performance of the top classification models. We quantify the quality of training data by applying various annotator agreement measures, and identify the weakest points of different datasets. We show that the model performance approaches the inter-annotator agreement when the size of the training set is sufficiently large. However, it is crucial to regularly monitor the self- and inter-annotator agreements since this improves the training datasets and consequently the model performance. Finally, we show that there is strong evidence that humans perceive the sentiment classes (negative, neutral, and positive) as ordered

Multi-argument classification for semantic role labeling

This paper describes a Multi-Argument Classification (MAC) approach to Semantic Role Labeling. The goal is to exploit dependencies between semantic roles by simultaneously classifying all arguments as a pattern. Argument identification, as a pre-processing stage, is carried at using the improved Predicate-Argument Recognition Algorithm (PARA) developed by Lin and Smith (2006). Results using standard evaluation metrics show that multi-argument classification, archieving 76.60 in F₁ measurement on WSJ 23, outperforms existing systems that use a single parse tree for the CoNLL 2005 shared task data. This paper also describes ways to significantly increase the speed of multi-argument classification, making it suitable for real-time language processing tasks that require semantic role labelling