Asynchronous neighborhood task synchronization

Faults are likely to occur in distributed systems. The motivation for designing self-stabilizing system is to be able to automatically recover from a faulty state. As per Dijkstra\u27s definition, a system is self-stabilizing if it converges to a desired state from an arbitrary state in a finite number of steps. The paradigm of self-stabilization is considered to be the most unified approach to designing fault-tolerant systems. Any type of faults, e.g., transient, process crashes and restart, link failures and recoveries, and byzantine faults, can be handled by a self-stabilizing system; Many applications in distributed systems involve multiple phases. Solving these applications require some degree of synchronization of phases. In this thesis research, we introduce a new problem, called asynchronous neighborhood task synchronization ( NTS ). In this problem, processes execute infinite instances of tasks, where a task consists of a set of steps. There are several requirements for this problem. Simultaneous execution of steps by the neighbors is allowed only if the steps are different. Every neighborhood is synchronized in the sense that all neighboring processes execute the same instance of a task. Although the NTS problem is applicable in nonfaulty environments, it is more challenging to solve this problem considering various types of faults. In this research, we will present a self-stabilizing solution to the NTS problem. The proposed solution is space optimal, fault containing, fully localized, and fully distributed. One of the most desirable properties of our algorithm is that it works under any (including unfair) daemon. We will discuss various applications of the NTS problem

Robust network computation

Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2005.Includes bibliographical references (p. 91-98).In this thesis, we present various models of distributed computation and algorithms for these models. The underlying theme is to come up with fast algorithms that can tolerate faults in the underlying network. We begin with the classical message-passing model of computation, surveying many known results. We give a new, universally optimal, edge-biconnectivity algorithm for the classical model. We also give a near-optimal sub-linear algorithm for identifying bridges, when all nodes are activated simultaneously. After discussing some ways in which the classical model is unrealistic, we survey known techniques for adapting the classical model to the real world. We describe a new balancing model of computation. The intent is that algorithms in this model should be automatically fault-tolerant. Existing algorithms that can be expressed in this model are discussed, including ones for clustering, maximum flow, and synchronization. We discuss the use of agents in our model, and give new agent-based algorithms for census and biconnectivity. Inspired by the balancing model, we look at two problems in more depth.(cont.) First, we give matching upper and lower bounds on the time complexity of the census algorithm, and we show how the census algorithm can be used to name nodes uniquely in a faulty network. Second, we consider using discrete harmonic functions as a computational tool. These functions are a natural exemplar of the balancing model. We prove new results concerning the stability and convergence of discrete harmonic functions, and describe a method which we call Eulerization for speeding up convergence.by David Pritchard.M.Eng

Distributed stabilizing data structures

Distributed algorithms aim to achieve better performance than sequential algorithms in terms of time complexity (or asymptotic time complexity) while keeping or lowering the memory requirement (space complexity) in a node. (In sequential algorithms, the memory requirement is the memory requirement of the algorithm itself.); Self-stabilizing distributed algorithms aim to achieve a comparable performance to non-stabilizing distributed algorithms when transient faults or arbitrary initialization cause the system to enter a state where a non-stabilizing algorithm cannot continue to properly perform its task; Transient faults can affect an existing data structure and alter its data content. As a result, the data structure may lose its properties, and the operations defined over the data structure will have unpredictable and undesirable results, making the data structure unusable; We present several self or snap-stabilizing algorithms for particular data structures; We propose an optimal self-stabilizing distributed algorithm for simultaneously activating non-adjacent processes on an oriented chain (Algorithm SSDS ). We use Algorithm SSDS to accomplish two tasks: local mutual exclusion and line sorting. We propose two uniform, self-stabilizing, deterministic protocols on oriented chains: a time and space optimal solution to the local mutual exclusion problem (Algorithm LMEC ), and a space and (asymptotic) time optimal solution to the distributed sorting problem (Algorithm SORTc ); We extend Algorithm SSDS to an asynchronous oriented ring with a distinguished node with some minor modifications, and we obtain general self-stabilization for simultaneously activated non-adjacent processes in an oriented ring with a distinguished process (Algorithm SSDSR ). We use Algorithm SSDSR to accomplish two tasks: local resource allocation and ring sorting. We propose two uniform, self-stabilizing, deterministic protocols on oriented rings: a time and space optimal solution to the local resource allocation problem (Algorithm LRAR ), and a space and (asymptotic) time optimal solution to the distributed sorting problem (Algorithm SORTr ); We extend Algorithm SSDS to an asynchronous rooted tree, and we obtain general self-stabilization for simultaneously activated non-adjacent processes in a rooted tree (Algorithm SSDST ). We then give two applications of Algorithm SSDST : a time and space optimal solution to the local mutual exclusion problem (Algorithm LMET ) and a space and (asymptotically) time optimal solution to the min heap problem (Algorithm HEAP ); In proving the time complexity of sorting, we introduce the notion of pseudo-time, similar to logical time introduced by Lamport; We present the first snap-stabilizing distributed binary search tree (BST) algorithm. The proposed algorithm uses a heap algorithm (Algorithm Heap) as a preprocessing step. This is also the first snap-stabilizing distributed solution to the heap problem

A Taxonomy of Daemons in Self-stabilization

We survey existing scheduling hypotheses made in the literature in self-stabilization, commonly referred to under the notion of daemon. We show that four main characteristics (distribution, fairness, boundedness, and enabledness) are enough to encapsulate the various differences presented in existing work. Our naming scheme makes it easy to compare daemons of particular classes, and to extend existing possibility or impossibility results to new daemons. We further examine existing daemon transformer schemes and provide the exact transformed characteristics of those transformers in our taxonomy.Comment: 26 page

An optimal maximal independent setalgorithm for bounded-independence graphs

We present a novel distributed algorithm for the maximal independent set problem (This is an extended journal version of Schneider and Wattenhofer in Twenty-seventh annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on principles of distributed computing, 2008). On bounded-independence graphs our deterministic algorithm finishes in O(log* n) time, n being the number of nodes. In light of Linial's Ω(log* n) lower bound our algorithm is asymptotically optimal. Furthermore, it solves the connected dominating set problem for unit disk graphs in O(log* n) time, exponentially faster than the state-of-the-art algorithm. With a new extension our algorithm also computes a δ+1 coloring and a maximal matching in O(log* n) time, where δ is the maximum degree of the grap

Notes on Theory of Distributed Systems

Notes for the Yale course CPSC 465/565 Theory of Distributed Systems

Weak models of wireless distributed computing Comparison between radio networks and population protocols

This thesis compares weak distributed computing models that are suit- able for extremely limited wireless networks. The comparison is mainly between multiple variations of radio networks and population protocols. The analysis is based on model features, computability and algorithmic complexity. The thesis analyses essential and optional model features, and organizes the models accordingly. It discusses the applicability of results from stronger models to radio network models, including impossibility results, algorithms and their runtime. It analyzes different radio network algorithms for the classical problems in terms of their features, and it discusses their applicability to other radio network models. It reviews the fundamental differences between population protocols and radio networks. Lastly, the comparative analysis summarizes fundamental differences and separating features