Design for a Darwinian Brain: Part 1. Philosophy and Neuroscience

Physical symbol systems are needed for open-ended cognition. A good way to understand physical symbol systems is by comparison of thought to chemistry. Both have systematicity, productivity and compositionality. The state of the art in cognitive architectures for open-ended cognition is critically assessed. I conclude that a cognitive architecture that evolves symbol structures in the brain is a promising candidate to explain open-ended cognition. Part 2 of the paper presents such a cognitive architecture.Comment: Darwinian Neurodynamics. Submitted as a two part paper to Living Machines 2013 Natural History Museum, Londo

L’auto-exploration des espaces sensorimoteurs chez les robots

Developmental robotics has begun in the last fifteen years to study robots that havea childhood—crawling before trying to run, playing before being useful—and that are basing their decisions upon a lifelong and embodied experience of the real-world. In this context, this thesis studies sensorimotor exploration—the discovery of a robot’s own body and proximal environment—during the early developmental stages, when no prior experience of the world is available. Specifically, we investigate how to generate a diversity of effects in an unknown environment. This approach distinguishes itself by its lack of user-defined reward or fitness function, making it especially suited for integration in self-sufficient platforms. In a first part, we motivate our approach, formalize the exploration problem, define quantitative measures to assess performance, and propose an architectural framework to devise algorithms. through the extensive examination of a multi-joint arm example, we explore some of the fundamental challenges that sensorimotor exploration faces, such as high-dimensionality and sensorimotor redundancy, in particular through a comparison between motor and goal babbling exploration strategies. We propose several algorithms and empirically study their behaviour, investigating the interactions with developmental constraints, external demonstrations and biologicallyinspired motor synergies. Furthermore, because even efficient algorithms can provide disastrous performance when their learning abilities do not align with the environment’s characteristics, we propose an architecture that can dynamically discriminate among a set of exploration strategies. Even with good algorithms, sensorimotor exploration is still an expensive proposition— a problem since robots inherently face constraints on the amount of data they are able to gather; each observation takes a non-negligible time to collect. [...] Throughout this thesis, our core contributions are algorithms description and empirical results. In order to allow unrestricted examination and reproduction of all our results, the entire code is made available. Sensorimotor exploration is a fundamental developmental mechanism of biological systems. By decoupling it from learning and studying it in its own right in this thesis, we engage in an approach that casts light on important problems facing robots developing on their own.La robotique développementale a entrepris, au courant des quinze dernières années,d’étudier les processus développementaux, similaires à ceux des systèmes biologiques,chez les robots. Le but est de créer des robots qui ont une enfance—qui rampent avant d’essayer de courir, qui jouent avant de travailler—et qui basent leurs décisions sur l’expérience de toute une vie, incarnés dans le monde réel.Dans ce contexte, cette thèse étudie l’exploration sensorimotrice—la découverte pour un robot de son propre corps et de son environnement proche—pendant les premiers stage du développement, lorsque qu’aucune expérience préalable du monde n’est disponible. Plus spécifiquement, cette thèse se penche sur comment générer une diversité d’effets dans un environnement inconnu. Cette approche se distingue par son absence de fonction de récompense ou de fitness définie par un expert, la rendant particulièrement apte à être intégrée sur des robots auto-suffisants.Dans une première partie, l’approche est motivée et le problème de l’exploration est formalisé, avec la définition de mesures quantitatives pour évaluer le comportement des algorithmes et d’un cadre architectural pour la création de ces derniers. Via l’examen détaillé de l’exemple d’un bras robot à multiple degrés de liberté, la thèse explore quelques unes des problématiques fondamentales que l’exploration sensorimotrice pose, comme la haute dimensionnalité et la redondance sensorimotrice. Cela est fait en particulier via la comparaison entre deux stratégies d’exploration: le babillage moteur et le babillage dirigé par les objectifs. Plusieurs algorithmes sont proposés tour à tour et leur comportement est évalué empiriquement, étudiant les interactions qui naissent avec les contraintes développementales, les démonstrations externes et les synergies motrices. De plus, parce que même des algorithmes efficaces peuvent se révéler terriblement inefficaces lorsque leurs capacités d’apprentissage ne sont pas adaptés aux caractéristiques de leur environnement, une architecture est proposée qui peut dynamiquement choisir la stratégie d’exploration la plus adaptée parmi un ensemble de stratégies. Mais même avec de bons algorithmes, l’exploration sensorimotrice reste une entreprise coûteuse—un problème important, étant donné que les robots font face à des contraintes fortes sur la quantité de données qu’ils peuvent extraire de leur environnement;chaque observation prenant un temps non-négligeable à récupérer. [...] À travers cette thèse, les contributions les plus importantes sont les descriptions algorithmiques et les résultats expérimentaux. De manière à permettre la reproduction et la réexamination sans contrainte de tous les résultats, l’ensemble du code est mis à disposition. L’exploration sensorimotrice est un mécanisme fondamental du développement des systèmes biologiques. La séparer délibérément des mécanismes d’apprentissage et l’étudier pour elle-même dans cette thèse permet d’éclairer des problèmes importants que les robots se développant seuls seront amenés à affronter

Development of a Large-Scale Integrated Neurocognitive Architecture Part 1: Conceptual Framework

The idea of creating a general purpose machine intelligence that captures many of the features of human cognition goes back at least to the earliest days of artificial intelligence and neural computation. In spite of more than a half-century of research on this issue, there is currently no existing approach to machine intelligence that comes close to providing a powerful, general-purpose human-level intelligence. However, substantial progress made during recent years in neural computation, high performance computing, neuroscience and cognitive science suggests that a renewed effort to produce a general purpose and adaptive machine intelligence is timely, likely to yield qualitatively more powerful approaches to machine intelligence than those currently existing, and certain to lead to substantial progress in cognitive science, AI and neural computation. In this report, we outline a conceptual framework for the long-term development of a large-scale machine intelligence that is based on the modular organization, dynamics and plasticity of the human brain. Some basic design principles are presented along with a review of some of the relevant existing knowledge about the neurobiological basis of cognition. Three intermediate-scale prototypes for parts of a larger system are successfully implemented, providing support for the effectiveness of several of the principles in our framework. We conclude that a human-competitive neuromorphic system for machine intelligence is a viable long- term goal, but that for the short term, substantial integration with more standard symbolic methods as well as substantial research will be needed to make this goal achievable

Projective simulation for artificial intelligence

We propose a model of a learning agent whose interaction with the environment is governed by a simulation-based projection, which allows the agent to project itself into future situations before it takes real action. Projective simulation is based on a random walk through a network of clips, which are elementary patches of episodic memory. The network of clips changes dynamically, both due to new perceptual input and due to certain compositional principles of the simulation process. During simulation, the clips are screened for specific features which trigger factual action of the agent. The scheme is different from other, computational, notions of simulation, and it provides a new element in an embodied cognitive science approach to intelligent action and learning. Our model provides a natural route for generalization to quantum-mechanical operation and connects the fields of reinforcement learning and quantum computation.Comment: 22 pages, 18 figures. Close to published version, with footnotes retaine

Natural Curiosity

Curiosity is evident in humans of all sorts from early infancy, and it has also been said to appear in a wide range of other animals, including monkeys, birds, rats, and octopuses. The classical definition of curiosity as an intrinsic desire for knowledge may seem inapplicable to animal curiosity: one might wonder how and indeed whether a rat could have such a fancy desire. Even if rats must learn many things to survive, one might expect their learning must be driven by simpler incentives, such as hunger. One might also wonder what proximal signals could guide animals towards knowledge itself, or how something as abstract as knowledge could ever be a motivational target for an unreflective animal. Taking a cue from recent work in reinforcement learning, I argue that surprise functions as a reward signal for the curious animal, and then show how this amounts to a desire for knowledge gain, where knowledge is conceived of as a cognitive adaptation to reality. This adaptation results in a mental state whose existence depends essentially on the truth of its contents, a factive mental state. Curious creatures benefit from an interaction between the prediction-error correction processes of basic learning and the active surprise-seeking force of their curiosity. This internally adversarial interaction accelerates knowledge gain in ways that are very helpful for agents with the restrictions of biological creatures, in environments with the complexity of our natural world