The changing face of innovation policy: implications for the Northern Ireland economy

No description supplie

ATTRACTING INVESTMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMART CITY PHU QUOC - KIEN GIANG PROVINCE

On August 1, 2018, the Prime Minister issued Decision No. 950/QD-TTg, Decided to approve the project of sustainable, innovative city development in Vietnam from 2018 to 2025 and orientation to 2030 (Decision No. 950/TTg) along with the requirement to increase the mobilization of investment capital, domestic and foreign technical assistance. Thus, Phu Quoc Urban, Kien Giang province, is considered a typical pilot of Kien Giang and Vietnam to effectively exploit the potential and turn Phu Quoc into a luxury tourist city, currently modern, intelligent, and safe, environmentally friendly, attracting tourists all over the world. The development of Phu Quoc is oriented to develop synchronously in technical infrastructure, database, quality of life, intelligent city management, landscape, sustainable development, and competitiveness improvement. Competition, effective public services, ensuring security and social order and safety. This article answers the question, "How to attract domestic and foreign resources to invest in developing Phu Quoc's smart city to help Phu Quoc achieve the goals and vision stated above".The article has the task of defining the concept of resources limited to finance and new and innovative technologies for smart cities. The article also examines the influencing factors that play a decisive role in attracting and mobilizing resources to meet the development goals of smart Phu Quoc city. The article will answer the research question that with the primary investment resources being the minimal state budget, how to attract the whole society's resources, especially foreign direct investment and investment from foreign countries. Large private corporations in the country have capital, technology, management experience, and smart city construction potential. The article studies the experience of attracting and mobilizing investment for smart cities globally, clarifying the current investment situation of Phu Quoc and the current requirements for mobilizing investment resources in Phu Quoc. The article proposes the immediate solution to attract and mobilize investment resources from different economic sectors for Phu Quoc smart city, focusing on private resources and foreign direct investment (FDI) resources. The solutions will focus on renewing thinking and awareness in piloting new mechanisms, perfecting mechanisms and policies to encourage resource mobilization of all economic sectors, especially the public-private coordination mechanism and modern technology for investment and development of Phu Quoc, turning this city into a bright and modern city at the top level of the whole ASEAN region soon. The article uses a qualitative approach and analysis, synthesis, and comparison methods to serve the research. The data is secondary collected from various sources of Kien Giang departments and business associations. Keywords: Smart city Phu Quoc, Capital Mobilization, Non-State Investment, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

New Metropolitan Perspectives

​This open access book presents the outcomes of the symposium “NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES,” held at Mediterranea University, Reggio Calabria, Italy on May 26–28, 2020. Addressing the challenge of Knowledge Dynamics and Innovation-driven Policies Towards Urban and Regional Transition, the book presents a multi-disciplinary debate on the new frontiers of strategic and spatial planning, economic programs and decision support tools in connection with urban–rural area networks and metropolitan centers. The respective papers focus on six major tracks: Innovation dynamics, smart cities and ICT; Urban regeneration, community-led practices and PPP; Local development, inland and urban areas in territorial cohesion strategies; Mobility, accessibility and infrastructures; Heritage, landscape and identity;and Risk management,environment and energy. The book also includes a Special Section on Rhegion United Nations 2020-2030. Given its scope, the book will benefit all researchers, practitioners and policymakers interested in issues concerning metropolitan and marginal areas

Harnessing E-Collaboration for Rural Tourism Recovery after COVID-19: Dual Analysis using SWOT and Porter’s Diamond Model

IT for rural tourism was in place before the COVID-19 pandemic emerged; however, the initiatives were intermittent and isolated. The effects of the pandemic encourage e-collaboration to accelerate the recovery of tourism. This study explores the opportunities, strategies and barriers to e-collaboration in tourism business activities. Systematic literature studies were carried out by the PRISMA approach and analyzed with the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). Meta-analysis results are mapped in a matrix combination of SWOT and Porter’s Diamond Model. This matrix was discussed with experts selected based on their experience in IT-based collaborative activities through FDG. This study’s driving factors are management commitment, culture, trust, citizens, and local community involvement. Inhibiting factors are a lack of IT, the risk of conflict, and particular parties’ domination. Several strategies to increase e-collaboration opportunities are empowering local entrepreneurship, encouraging continuous innovation, and sharing knowledge. Conflict management and increasing trust between members need to be considered to overcome barriers to e-collaboration. This study provides a novel overview of the main issues discussed in previous tourism research regarding the importance of IT to accelerate economic recovery in the face of disruption, such as a pandemic. The study examines the case of Indonesia and hopes to become a reference for optimizing IT for the recovery of rural tourism in developing countries with similar characteristics. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01297 Full Text: PD

Strategies for sustainable socio-economic development and mechanisms their implementation in the global dimension

The authors of the book have come to the conclusion that it is necessary to effectively use modern approaches to developing and implementation strategies of sustainable socio-economic development in order to increase efficiency and competitiveness of economic entities. Basic research focuses on economic diagnostics of socio-economic potential and financial results of economic entities, transition period in the economy of individual countries and ensuring their competitiveness, assessment of educational processes and knowledge management. The research results have been implemented in the different models and strategies of supply and logistics management, development of non-profit organizations, competitiveness of tourism and transport, financing strategies for small and medium-sized enterprises, cross-border cooperation. The results of the study can be used in decision-making at the level the economic entities in different areas of activity and organizational-legal forms of ownership, ministries and departments that promote of development the economic entities on the basis of models and strategies for sustainable socio-economic development. The results can also be used by students and young scientists in modern concepts and mechanisms for management of sustainable socio-economic development of economic entities in the condition of global economic transformations and challenges

Smart destinations and the evolution of ICTs: a new scenario for destination management?

[EN] The impact of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on tourism and their foreseeable future evolution seem to be shaping a new scenario for destination management. This new context has given rise to the need for new management models. One of these models is the emerging smart tourism destination (STD), although it requires greater conceptual precision in order to become a new paradigm for destination management. This paper proposes a systemic model for STDs which facilitates the interpretation of the role of ICTs in the management of tourism destinations. Accordingly, the Delphi technique has been applied so as to determine the opinion of experts regarding the feasibility of the STD approach, its advantages and limitations and also the size of the impact of ICTs on the management and marketing of tourism destinations. This prospective exercise highlights the intensification of the impact of ICTs over the coming years which will shape a new scenario for management characterised by technology and data management. However, the efficiency of the STD approach will not depend exclusively only on technology but also on an appropriate governance of the destination that systematically incorporates the three levels of the STD, namely the strategic¿relational, instrumental and applied levels.This research has been carried out within the framework of the project "New approaches for tourism destinations planning and management: conceptualization, case studies and problems. Definition of smart tourist destinations models" (CSO2014-59193-R) under the Spanish National R&D&I Plan financed by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.Ivars-Baidal, JA.; Celdrán-Bernabeu, MA.; Mazón, JN.; Perles Ivars, A. (2019). Smart destinations and the evolution of ICTs: a new scenario for destination management?. Current Issues in Tourism (Online). 22(13):1581-1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1388771S158116002213Benckendorff, P. J., Sheldon, P. J., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (Eds.). (2014). Tourism information technology. doi:10.1079/9781780641850.0000BERGER, S., LEHMANN, H., & LEHNER, F. (2003). LOCATION-BASED SERVICES IN THE TOURIST INDUSTRY. Information Technology & Tourism, 5(4), 243-256. doi:10.3727/109830503108751171Boes, K., Buhalis, D., & Inversini, A. (2014). Conceptualising Smart Tourism Destination Dimensions. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, 391-403. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_29Buhalis, D., & Amaranggana, A. (2014). Smart Tourism Destinations Enhancing Tourism Experience Through Personalisation of Services. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, 377-389. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_28Buhalis, D., & Foerste, M. (2015). SoCoMo marketing for travel and tourism: Empowering co-creation of value. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4(3), 151-161. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.04.001Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609-623. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005Buhalis, D., & Matloka, J. (2013). 24. Technology-enabled Tourism Destination Management and Marketing. Trends in European Tourism Planning and Organisation, 339-350. doi:10.21832/9781845414122-028Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. (2012). Smartness and European urban performance: assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 97-113. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660323Cetin, G., Aydogan Cifci, M., Istanbullu Dincer, F., & Fuchs, M. (2016). Coping with reintermediation: the case of SMHEs. Information Technology & Tourism, 16(4), 375-392. doi:10.1007/s40558-016-0063-2Chung, N., & Koo, C. (2015). The use of social media in travel information search. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 215-229. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2014.08.005Cole, Z. D., Donohoe, H. M., & Stellefson, M. L. (2013). Internet-Based Delphi Research: Case Based Discussion. Environmental Management, 51(3), 511-523. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-0005-5Del Chiappa, G., & Baggio, R. (2015). Knowledge transfer in smart tourism destinations: Analyzing the effects of a network structure. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4(3), 145-150. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.02.001Donohoe, H. M., & Needham, R. D. (2009). Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(5), 415-437. doi:10.1002/jtr.709Fuchs, M., Höpken, W., & Lexhagen, M. (2014). Big data analytics for knowledge generation in tourism destinations – A case from Sweden. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 3(4), 198-209. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2014.08.002Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (2000). Managing heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 682-708. doi:10.1016/s0160-7383(99)00094-8Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 179-188. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8Gretzel, U. (2011). Intelligent systems in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 757-779. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2011.04.014Gretzel, U., Werthner, H., Koo, C., & Lamsfus, C. (2015). Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 558-563. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.043Gretzel, U., Yuan, Y.-L., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2000). Preparing for the New Economy: Advertising Strategies and Change in Destination Marketing Organizations. Journal of Travel Research, 39(2), 146-156. doi:10.1177/004728750003900204Hall, M. C. (2008). Tourism and Innovation. doi:10.4324/9780203938430Hjalager, A.-M. (2013). 100 Innovations That Transformed Tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), 3-21. doi:10.1177/0047287513516390Ivars Baidal, J. A., Solsona Monzonís, F. J., & Giner Sánchez, D. (2016). Gestión turística y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC): El nuevo enfoque de los destinos inteligentes. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 62(2), 327. doi:10.5565/rev/dag.285Jolly, D., & Dimanche, F. (2009). Investing in technology for tourism activities: Perspectives and challenges. Technovation, 29(9), 576-579. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.004Jovicic, D. Z. (2016). Key issues in the conceptualization of tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 18(4), 445-457. doi:10.1080/14616688.2016.1183144Kanama, D., Kondo, A., & Yokoo, Y. (2008). Development of technology foresight: integration of technology roadmapping and the Delphi method. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 4(2), 184. doi:10.1504/ijtip.2008.018316Kitchin, R. (2014). Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131-136. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu027Law, R., Buhalis, D., & Cobanoglu, C. (2014). Progress on information and communication technologies in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(5), 727-750. doi:10.1108/ijchm-08-2013-0367Li, Y., Hu, C., Huang, C., & Duan, L. (2017). The concept of smart tourism in the context of tourism information services. Tourism Management, 58, 293-300. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.03.014March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2016). Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a Self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 816-830. doi:10.1177/0969776414554488Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43, 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.012Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2012). Conceptualising technology enhanced destination experiences. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 1(1-2), 36-46. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.08.001NIININEN, O. (2006). Consumer Centric Tourism Marketing. Tourism Management Dynamics, 175-186. doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-6378-6.50029-9Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002Saraniemi, S., & Kylänen, M. (2010). Problematizing the Concept of Tourism Destination: An Analysis of Different Theoretical Approaches. Journal of Travel Research, 50(2), 133-143. doi:10.1177/0047287510362775Wang, X., Li, X. (Robert), Zhen, F., & Zhang, J. (2016). How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach. Tourism Management, 54, 309-320. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.00