Efficient and Equitable Airport Slot Allocation

This paper studies slot allocation at congested airports in Europe. First, I discuss the inefficiencies of the current regulation, introduced as part of the liberalisation process of the air transport market. Then, I consider three marked based methods which are suitable to achieve a more efficient allocation of slots to airlines: congestion pricing, auctions and secondary trading. These methods are examined in terms of their ability to improve efficiency and in terms of their implications on the distribution of slots’ scarcity rents. Special attention is drawn to complementarities between slots. Finally, I propose to auction slots periodically, allowing secondary trading well before the first auction takes place. By selling slots before the first auction incumbents can be partially compensated for the subsequent withdrawal of their slots.

Quadratic Core-Selecting Payment Rules for Combinatorial Auctions

We report on the use of a quadratic programming technique in recent and upcoming spectrum auctions in Europe. Specifically, we compute a unique point in the core that minimizes the sum of squared deviations from a reference point, for example, from the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves payments. Analyzing the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions, we demonstrate that the resulting payments can be decomposed into a series of economically meaningful and equitable penalties. Furthermore, we discuss the benefits of this combinatorial auction, explore the use of alternative reserve pricing approaches in this context, and indicate the results of several hundred computational runs using CATS data.Auctions, spectrum auctions, market design, package auction, clock auction, combinatorial auction

Lottery pricing equilibria

We extend the notion of Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium, as defined by Feldman et al. [2013], to settings with budgets. When agents have budgets, the maximum social welfare as traditionally defined is not a suitable benchmark since it is overly optimistic. This motivated the liquid welfare of [Dobzinski and Paes Leme 2014] as an alternative. Observing that no combinatorial Walrasian equilibrium guarantees a non-zero fraction of the maximum liquid welfare in the absence of randomization, we instead work with randomized allocations and extend the notions of liquid welfare and Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium accordingly. Our generalization of the Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium prices lotteries over bundles of items rather than bundles, and we term it a lottery pricing equilibrium. Our results are two-fold. First, we exhibit an efficient algorithm which turns a randomized allocation with liquid expected welfare W into a lottery pricing equilibrium with liquid expected welfare 3-√5/2 W (≈ 0.3819-W). Next, given access to a demand oracle and an α-approximate oblivious rounding algorithm for the configuration linear program for the welfare maximization problem, we show how to efficiently compute a randomized allocation which is (a) supported on polynomially-many deterministic allocations and (b) obtains [nearly] an α fraction of the optimal liquid expected welfare. In the case of subadditive valuations, combining both results yields an efficient algorithm which computes a lottery pricing equilibrium obtaining a constant fraction of the optimal liquid expected welfare. © Copyright 2016 ACM

Tight Bounds for the Price of Anarchy of Simultaneous First Price Auctions

We study the Price of Anarchy of simultaneous first-price auctions for buyers with submodular and subadditive valuations. The current best upper bounds for the Bayesian Price of Anarchy of these auctions are e/(e-1) [Syrgkanis and Tardos 2013] and 2 [Feldman et al. 2013], respectively. We provide matching lower bounds for both cases even for the case of full information and for mixed Nash equilibria via an explicit construction. We present an alternative proof of the upper bound of e/(e-1) for first-price auctions with fractionally subadditive valuations which reveals the worst-case price distribution, that is used as a building block for the matching lower bound construction. We generalize our results to a general class of item bidding auctions that we call bid-dependent auctions (including first-price auctions and all-pay auctions) where the winner is always the highest bidder and each bidder's payment depends only on his own bid. Finally, we apply our techniques to discriminatory price multi-unit auctions. We complement the results of [de Keijzer et al. 2013] for the case of subadditive valuations, by providing a matching lower bound of 2. For the case of submodular valuations, we provide a lower bound of 1.109. For the same class of valuations, we were able to reproduce the upper bound of e/(e-1) using our non-smooth approach.Comment: 37 pages, 5 figures, ACM Transactions on Economics and Computatio

Models for Budget Constrained Auctions: An Application to Sponsored Search & Other Auctions

The last decade has seen the emergence of auction mechanisms for pricing and allocating goods on the Internet. A successful application area for auctions has been sponsored search. Search firms like Google, Bing and Yahoo have shown stellar revenue growths due to their ability to run large number of auctions in a computationally efficient manner. The online advertisement market in the U.S. is estimated to be around $41 billion in 2010 and expected to grow to$50 billion by 2011 (http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/us-online-advertising-market-to-reach-50b-in-2011-3128/). The paid search component is estimated to account for nearly 50% of online advertising spend. This dissertation considers two problems in the sponsored search auction domain. In sponsored search, the search operator solves a multi-unit allocation and pricing problem with the specified bidder values and budgets. The advertisers, on the other hand, regularly solve a bid determination problem for the different keywords, given their budget and other business constraints. We develop a model for the auctioneer that allows the bidders to place differing bids for different advertisement slots for any keyword combination. Despite the increased complexity, our model is solved in polynomial time. Next, we develop a column-generation procedure for large advertisers to bid optimally in the sponsored search auctions. Our focus is on solving large-scale versions of the problem. Multi-unit auctions have also found a number of applications in other areas that include supply chain coordination, wireless spectrum allocation and transportation. Current research in the multi-unit auction domain ignores the budget constraint faced by participants. We address the computational issues faced by the auctioneer when dealing with budget constraints in a multi-unit auction. We propose an optimization model and solution approach to ensure that the allocation and prices are in the core. We develop an algorithm to determine an allocation and Walrasian equilibrium prices (when they exist) under additive bidder valuations where the auctioneer's goal is social welfare maximization and extend the approach to address general package auctions. We, also, demonstrate the applicability of the Benders decomposition technique to model and solve the revenue maximization problem from an auctioneer's standpoint