8 research outputs found

    Buffy, Ballads, and Bad Guys Who Sing: Music in the Worlds of Joss Whedon

    Get PDF
    Edited Collection of essays on music in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, Firefly, and Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blo

    Trial by Farce

    Get PDF
    Was there more to comedy than Chaucer, the Second Shepherds’ Play, or Shakespeare? Of course! But, for a real taste of medieval and Renaissance humor and in-your-face slapstick, one must cross the Channel to France, where over two hundred extant farces regularly dazzled crowds with blistering satires. Dwarfing all other contemporaneous theatrical repertoires, the boisterous French corpus is populated by lawyers, lawyers everywhere. No surprise there. The lion’s share of mostly anonymous farces was written by barristers, law students, and legal apprentices. Famous for skewering unjust judges and irreligious ecclesiastics, they belonged to a 10,000-member legal society known as the Basoche, which flourished between 1450 and 1550. What is more, their dramatic send-ups of real and fictional court cases were still going strong on the eve of Molière, resilient against those who sought to censor and repress them. The suspenseful wait to see justice done has always made for high drama or, in this case, low drama. But, for centuries, the scripts for these outrageous shows were available only in French editions gathered from scattered print and manuscript sources. In Trial by Farce, prize-winning theater historian Jody Enders brings twelve of the funniest legal farces to English-speaking audiences in a refreshingly uncensored but philologically faithful vernacular. Newly conceived as much for scholars as for students and theater practitioners, this repertoire and its familiar stock characters come vividly to life as they struggle to negotiate the limits of power, politics, class, gender, and, above all, justice. Through the distinctive blend of wit, social critique, and breathless boisterousness that is farce, we gain a new understanding of comedy itself as form of political correction. In ways presciently modern and even postmodern, farce paints a different cultural picture of the notoriously authoritarian Middle Ages with its own vision of liberty and justice for all. Theater eternally offers ways for new generations to raise their voices and act

    Bowdoin Orient v.117, no.1-24 (1987-1988)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/bowdoinorient-1980s/1008/thumbnail.jp

    Trial by Farce

    Get PDF
    Was there more to comedy than Chaucer, the Second Shepherds’ Play, or Shakespeare? Of course! But, for a real taste of medieval and Renaissance humor and in-your-face slapstick, one must cross the Channel to France, where over two hundred extant farces regularly dazzled crowds with blistering satires. Dwarfing all other contemporaneous theatrical repertoires, the boisterous French corpus is populated by lawyers, lawyers everywhere. No surprise there. The lion’s share of mostly anonymous farces was written by barristers, law students, and legal apprentices. Famous for skewering unjust judges and irreligious ecclesiastics, they belonged to a 10,000-member legal society known as the Basoche, which flourished between 1450 and 1550. What is more, their dramatic send-ups of real and fictional court cases were still going strong on the eve of Molière, resilient against those who sought to censor and repress them. The suspenseful wait to see justice done has always made for high drama or, in this case, low drama. But, for centuries, the scripts for these outrageous shows were available only in French editions gathered from scattered print and manuscript sources. In Trial by Farce, prize-winning theater historian Jody Enders brings twelve of the funniest legal farces to English-speaking audiences in a refreshingly uncensored but philologically faithful vernacular. Newly conceived as much for scholars as for students and theater practitioners, this repertoire and its familiar stock characters come vividly to life as they struggle to negotiate the limits of power, politics, class, gender, and, above all, justice. Through the distinctive blend of wit, social critique, and breathless boisterousness that is farce, we gain a new understanding of comedy itself as form of political correction. In ways presciently modern and even postmodern, farce paints a different cultural picture of the notoriously authoritarian Middle Ages with its own vision of liberty and justice for all. Theater eternally offers ways for new generations to raise their voices and act

    Herod the Great in Medieval Art and Literature.

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this thesis is to examine the treatment of Herod the Great in medieval art and literature. Since the iconographic and other traditions of the subject are European, the scope of this study is European, except that the chapter on late vernacular non-dramatic literature, when the traditions are well established and more or less stereotyped, is confined to English sources. The opening chapters examine the accounts given by early historians, patristic commentators and the church liturgy for the traditions which they established and the interpretations which they sanctioned, and thereafter chapters deal in chronological sequence with the art and literature of the medieval period in their response to these traditions and interpretations. The most creative period in the iconography of scenes involving Herod in the visual arts was the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Artists of the Early Christian period were relatively conservative in their treatment of Herod the Great; not until the twelfth century did artists give visual expression to the early dramatic commentaries on Herod's violence and evil. A full flowering in the visual arts took place in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries when a vast array of motifs related to Herod in the Meeting with the Magi scene as well as that of the Massacre of the Innocents was developed. Other events from his life were introduced into art at this time, his suicide and death being the most important. Earlier artistic attempts to represent him as a regal and aloof emperor were abandoned in favour of more ingenious pottrayals of this king who was associated with devils and accustomed to wielding a sword. This was true for both English and Continental art. The art of the fifteenth century does not reflect the same vitality in its treatmen
    corecore