6,339 research outputs found

    Approximation Results for Preemptive Stochastic Online Scheduling

    Get PDF
    We present first constant performance guarantees for preemptive stochastic scheduling to minimize the sum of weighted completion times. For scheduling jobs with release dates on identical parallel machines we derive policies with a guaranteed performance ratio of 2 which matches the currently best known result for the corresponding deterministic online problem. Our policies apply to the recently introduced stochastic online scheduling model inwhich jobs arrive online over time. In contrast to the previously considered nonpreemptivesetting, our preemptive policies extensively utilize information on processing time distributions other than the first (and second) moments. In order to derive our results we introduce a new nontrivial lower bound on the expected value of an unknown optimal policy that we derive from an optimal policy for the basic problem on a single machine without release dates. This problem is known to be solved optimally by a Gittins index priority rule. This priority index also inspires the design of our policies.computer science applications;

    Stochastic scheduling on unrelated machines

    Get PDF
    Two important characteristics encountered in many real-world scheduling problems are heterogeneous machines/processors and a certain degree of uncertainty about the actual sizes of jobs. The first characteristic entails machine dependent processing times of jobs and is captured by the classical unrelated machine scheduling model.The second characteristic is adequately addressed by stochastic processing times of jobs as they are studied in classical stochastic scheduling models. While there is an extensive but separate literature for the two scheduling models, we study for the first time a combined model that takes both characteristics into account simultaneously. Here, the processing time of job jj on machine ii is governed by random variable PijP_{ij}, and its actual realization becomes known only upon job completion. With wjw_j being the given weight of job jj, we study the classical objective to minimize the expected total weighted completion time E[jwjCj]E[\sum_j w_jC_j], where CjC_j is the completion time of job jj. By means of a novel time-indexed linear programming relaxation, we compute in polynomial time a scheduling policy with performance guarantee (3+Δ)/2+ϵ(3+\Delta)/2+\epsilon. Here, ϵ>0\epsilon>0 is arbitrarily small, and Δ\Delta is an upper bound on the squared coefficient of variation of the processing times. We show that the dependence of the performance guarantee on Δ\Delta is tight, as we obtain a Δ/2\Delta/2 lower bound for the type of policies that we use. When jobs also have individual release dates rijr_{ij}, our bound is (2+Δ)+ϵ(2+\Delta)+\epsilon. Via Δ=0\Delta=0, currently best known bounds for deterministic scheduling are contained as a special case

    Greed Works -- Online Algorithms For Unrelated Machine Stochastic Scheduling

    Get PDF
    This paper establishes performance guarantees for online algorithms that schedule stochastic, nonpreemptive jobs on unrelated machines to minimize the expected total weighted completion time. Prior work on unrelated machine scheduling with stochastic jobs was restricted to the offline case, and required linear or convex programming relaxations for the assignment of jobs to machines. The algorithms introduced in this paper are purely combinatorial. The performance bounds are of the same order of magnitude as those of earlier work, and depend linearly on an upper bound on the squared coefficient of variation of the jobs' processing times. Specifically for deterministic processing times, without and with release times, the competitive ratios are 4 and 7.216, respectively. As to the technical contribution, the paper shows how dual fitting techniques can be used for stochastic and nonpreemptive scheduling problems.Comment: Preliminary version appeared in IPCO 201

    Lower bounds for Smith's rule in stochastic machine scheduling

    Get PDF
    We consider the problem to minimize the weighted sum of completion times in nonpreemptive parallel machine scheduling. In a landmark paper from 1986, Kawaguchi and Kyan [5] showed that scheduling the jobs according to the WSPT rule -also known as Smith's rule- has a performance guarantee of 12(1+2)1.207{1\over 2}(1+\sqrt{2}) \approx 1.207. They also gave an instance to show that this bound is tight. We consider the stochastic variant of this problem in which the processing times are exponentially distributed random variables. We show,somehow counterintuitively, that the performance guarantee of the WSEPT rule, the stochastic analogue of WSPT, is not better than 1.229. This constitutes the first lower bound for WSEPT in this setting, and in particular, it shows that even with exponentially distributed processing times, stochastic scheduling has somewhat nastier worst-case examples than deterministic scheduling. In that respect, our analysis sheds new light on the fundamental differences between deterministic and stochastic scheduling

    Scheduling under Linear Constraints

    Full text link
    We introduce a parallel machine scheduling problem in which the processing times of jobs are not given in advance but are determined by a system of linear constraints. The objective is to minimize the makespan, i.e., the maximum job completion time among all feasible choices. This novel problem is motivated by various real-world application scenarios. We discuss the computational complexity and algorithms for various settings of this problem. In particular, we show that if there is only one machine with an arbitrary number of linear constraints, or there is an arbitrary number of machines with no more than two linear constraints, or both the number of machines and the number of linear constraints are fixed constants, then the problem is polynomial-time solvable via solving a series of linear programming problems. If both the number of machines and the number of constraints are inputs of the problem instance, then the problem is NP-Hard. We further propose several approximation algorithms for the latter case.Comment: 21 page
    corecore