1,718 research outputs found

    Online Advertising Assignment Problems Considering Realistic Constraints

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ๋ฌธ์ผ๊ฒฝ.With a drastic increase in online communities, many companies have been paying attention to online advertising. The main advantages of online advertising are traceability, cost-effectiveness, reachability, and interactivity. The benefits facilitate the continuous popularity of online advertising. For Internet-based companies, a well-constructed online advertisement assignment increases their revenue. Hence, the managers need to develop their decision-making processes for assigning online advertisements on their website so that their revenue is maximized. In this dissertation, we consider online advertising assignment problems considering realistic constraints. There are three types of online advertising assignment problems: (i) Display ads problem in adversarial order, (ii) Display ads problem in probabilistic order, and (iii) Online banner advertisement scheduling for advertising effectiveness. Unlike previous assignment problems, the problems are pragmatic approaches that reflect realistic constraints and advertising effectiveness. Moreover, the algorithms the dissertation designs offer important insights into the online advertisement assignment problem. We give a brief explanation of the fundamental methodologies to solve the online advertising assignment problems in Chapter 1. At the end of this chapter, the contributions and outline of the dissertation are also presented. In Chapter 2, we propose the display ads problem in adversarial order. Deterministic algorithms with worst-case guarantees are designed, and the competitive ratios of them are presented. Upper bounds for the problem are also proved. We investigate the display ads problem in probabilistic order in Chapter 3. This chapter presents stochastic online algorithms with scenario-based stochastic programming and Benders decomposition for two probabilistic order models. In Chapter 4, an online banner advertisement scheduling model for advertising effectiveness is designed. We also present the solution methodologies used to obtain valid lower and upper bounds of the model efficiently. Chapter 5 offers conclusions and suggestion for future studies. The approaches to solving the problems are meaningful in both academic and industrial areas. We validate these approaches can solve the problems efficiently and effectively by conducting computational experiments. The models and solution methodologies are expected to be convenient and beneficial when managers at Internet-based companies place online advertisements on their websites.์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ์˜ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋งŽ์€ ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ ์— ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๊ธฐ์šธ์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ ์˜ ์žฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ถ”์  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ, ๋น„์šฉ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ, ๋„๋‹ฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ, ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ฑ ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์„ ๋‘๋Š” ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ž˜ ์งœ์—ฌ์ง„ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น๊ฒฐ์ •์— ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋‘๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ๊ด‘๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ต๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ž๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ต์„ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น ์˜์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ œ์•ฝ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” (1) adversarial ์ˆœ์„œ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ์• ๋“œ๋ฌธ์ œ, (2) probabilistic ์ˆœ์„œ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ์• ๋“œ๋ฌธ์ œ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  (3) ๊ด‘๊ณ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๋ฐฐ๋„ˆ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ์ผ์ •๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์ „์— ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์€ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ œ์•ฝ๊ณผ ๊ด‘๊ณ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ์šด์˜๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. 1์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์™€ ๊ฐœ์š”๋„ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ๋‹ค. 2์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” adversarial ์ˆœ์„œ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ์• ๋“œ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. worst-case๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋“ค์˜ competitive ratio๋ฅผ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ์ƒํ•œ๋„ ์ž…์ฆ๋œ๋‹ค. 3์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” probabilistic ์ˆœ์„œ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ์• ๋“œ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ Benders ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•œ ์ถ”๊ณ„ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. 4์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘๊ณ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๋ฐฐ๋„ˆ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ์ผ์ •๊ณ„ํš์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์œ ํšจํ•œ ์ƒํ•œ๊ณผ ํ•˜ํ•œ์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. 5์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๊ณผ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ํ•™์ˆ  ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ถ„์•ผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€ ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ํ• ๋‹น๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Display Ads Problem 3 1.1.1 Online Algorithm 4 1.2 Online Banner Advertisement Scheduling Problem 5 1.3 Research Motivations and Contributions 6 1.4 Outline of the Dissertation 9 Chapter 2 Online Advertising Assignment Problem in Adversarial Order 12 2.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 12 2.2 Display Ads Problem in Adversarial Order 15 2.3 Deterministic Algorithms for Adversarial Order 17 2.4 Upper Bounds of Deterministic Algorithms for Adversarial Order 22 2.5 Summary 28 Chapter 3 Online Advertising Assignment Problem in Probabilistic Order 30 3.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 30 3.2 Display Ads Problem in Probabilistic Order 33 3.3 Stochastic Online Algorithms for Probabilistic Order 34 3.3.1 Two-Stage Stochastic Programming 35 3.3.2 Known IID model 37 3.3.3 Random permutation model 41 3.3.4 Stochastic approach using primal-dual algorithm 45 3.4 Computational Experiments 48 3.4.1 Results for known IID model 55 3.4.2 Results for random permutation model 57 3.4.3 Managerial insights for Algorithm 3.1 59 3.5 Summary 60 Chapter 4 Online Banner Advertisement Scheduling for Advertising Effectiveness 61 4.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 61 4.2 Mathematical Model 68 4.2.1 Objective function 68 4.2.2 Notations and formulation 72 4.3 Solution Methodologies 74 4.3.1 Heuristic approach to finding valid lower and upper bounds 75 4.3.2 Hybrid tabu search 79 4.4 Computational Experiments 80 4.4.1 Results for problems with small data sets 82 4.4.2 Results for problems with large data sets 84 4.4.3 Results for problems with standard data 86 4.4.4 Managerial insights for the results 90 4.5 Summary 92 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Research 93 Appendices 97 A Initial Sequence of the Hybrid Tabu Search 98 B Procedure of the Hybrid Tabu Search 99 C Small Example of the Hybrid Tabu Search 101 D Linearization Technique of Bilinear Form in R2 104 Bibliography 106Docto

    Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Scheduling Advertisements on a Web Page

    Get PDF
    Many web sites provide free services to users. The revenue for these sites is dependent on the advertisements they place on their web pages. For these firms, therefore, the optimal placing of advertisements on their web pages becomes a critical issue. In a given planning horizon, we assume that the number of advertisements available for placement on a web site is greater than the available space. The site, therefore, needs to determine the optimal allocation of advertisement space. We develop a hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) that uses problem specific knowledge during the evolution of solutions to solve this problem. Our initial computational results show that the hybrid GA performs exceptionally well in the sense that it provides optimal or near optimal solutions for a variety of problems

    Screen real estate ownership based mechanism for negotiating advertisement display

    Get PDF
    As popularity of online video grows, a number of models of advertising are emerging. It is typically the brokers โ€“ usually the operators of websites โ€“ who maintain the balance between content and advertising. Existing approaches focus primarily on personalizing advertisements for viewer segments, with minimal decision-making capacity for individual viewers. We take a resource ownership view on this problem. We view consumersโ€™ attention space, which can be abstracted as a display screen for an engaged viewer, as precious resource owned by the viewer. Viewers pay for the content they wish to view in dollars, as well as in terms of their attention. Specifically, advertisers may make partial payment for a viewerโ€™s content, in return for receiving the viewerโ€™s attention to their advertising. Our approach, named โ€œFlexAdSenseโ€, is based on CyberOrgs model, which encapsulates distributed owned resources for multi-agent computations. We build a market of viewersโ€™ attention space in which advertisers can trade, just as viewers can trade in a market of content. We have developed key mechanisms to give viewers flexible control over the display of advertisements in real time. Specific policies needed for automated negotiations can be plugged-in. This approach relaxes the exclusivity of the relationship between advertisers and brokers, and empowers viewers, enhancing their viewing experience. This thesis presents the rationale, design, implementation, and evaluation of FlexAdSense. Feature comparison with existing advertising mechanisms shows how FlexAdSense enables viewers to control with fine-grained flexibility. Experimental results demonstrate the scalability of the approach, as the number of viewers increases. A preliminary analysis of user overhead illustrates minimal attention overhead for viewers as they customize their policies
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore