172 research outputs found
Pre-validation of SoC via hardware and software co-simulation
Abstract. System-on-chips (SoCs) are complex entities consisting of multiple hardware and software components. This complexity presents challenges in their design, verification, and validation. Traditional verification processes often test hardware models in isolation until late in the development cycle. As a result, cooperation between hardware and software development is also limited, slowing down bug detection and fixing.
This thesis aims to develop, implement, and evaluate a co-simulation-based pre-validation methodology to address these challenges. The approach allows for the early integration of hardware and software, serving as a natural intermediate step between traditional hardware model verification and full system validation. The co-simulation employs a QEMU CPU emulator linked to a register-transfer level (RTL) hardware model. This setup enables the execution of software components, such as device drivers, on the target instruction set architecture (ISA) alongside cycle-accurate RTL hardware models.
The thesis focuses on two primary applications of co-simulation. Firstly, it allows software unit tests to be run in conjunction with hardware models, facilitating early communication between device drivers, low-level software, and hardware components. Secondly, it offers an environment for using software in functional hardware verification.
A significant advantage of this approach is the early detection of integration errors. Software unit tests can be executed at the IP block level with actual hardware models, a task previously only possible with costly system-level prototypes. This enables earlier collaboration between software and hardware development teams and smoothens the transition to traditional system-level validation techniques.Järjestelmäpiirin esivalidointi laitteiston ja ohjelmiston yhteissimulaatiolla. Tiivistelmä. Järjestelmäpiirit (SoC) ovat monimutkaisia kokonaisuuksia, jotka koostuvat useista laitteisto- ja ohjelmistokomponenteista. Tämä monimutkaisuus asettaa haasteita niiden suunnittelulle, varmennukselle ja validoinnille. Perinteiset varmennusprosessit testaavat usein laitteistomalleja eristyksissä kehityssyklin loppuvaiheeseen saakka. Tämän myötä myös yhteistyö laitteisto- ja ohjelmistokehityksen välillä on vähäistä, mikä hidastaa virheiden tunnistamista ja korjausta.
Tämän diplomityön tavoitteena on kehittää, toteuttaa ja arvioida laitteisto-ohjelmisto-yhteissimulointiin perustuva esivalidointimenetelmä näiden haasteiden ratkaisemiseksi. Menetelmä mahdollistaa laitteiston ja ohjelmiston varhaisen integroinnin, toimien luonnollisena välietappina perinteisen laitteistomallin varmennuksen ja koko järjestelmän validoinnin välillä. Yhteissimulointi käyttää QEMU suoritinemulaattoria, joka on yhdistetty rekisterinsiirtotason (RTL) laitteistomalliin. Tämä mahdollistaa ohjelmistokomponenttien, kuten laiteajureiden, suorittamisen kohdejärjestelmän käskysarja-arkkitehtuurilla (ISA) yhdessä kellosyklitarkkojen RTL laitteistomallien kanssa.
Työ keskittyy kahteen yhteissimulaation pääsovellukseen. Ensinnäkin se mahdollistaa ohjelmiston yksikkötestien suorittamisen laitteistomallien kanssa, varmistaen kommunikaation laiteajurien, matalan tason ohjelmiston ja laitteistokomponenttien välillä. Toiseksi se tarjoaa ympäristön ohjelmiston käyttämiseen toiminnallisessa laitteiston varmennuksessa.
Merkittävä etu tästä lähestymistavasta on integraatiovirheiden varhainen havaitseminen. Ohjelmiston yksikkötestejä voidaan suorittaa jo IP-lohkon tasolla oikeilla laitteistomalleilla, mikä on aiemmin ollut mahdollista vain kalliilla järjestelmätason prototyypeillä. Tämä mahdollistaa aikaisemman ohjelmisto- ja laitteistokehitystiimien välisen yhteistyön ja helpottaa siirtymistä perinteisiin järjestelmätason validointimenetelmiin
Methoden und Beschreibungssprachen zur Modellierung und Verifikation vonSchaltungen und Systemen: MBMV 2015 - Tagungsband, Chemnitz, 03. - 04. März 2015
Der Workshop Methoden und Beschreibungssprachen zur Modellierung und Verifikation von Schaltungen und Systemen (MBMV 2015) findet nun schon zum 18. mal statt. Ausrichter sind in diesem Jahr die Professur Schaltkreis- und Systementwurf der Technischen Universität Chemnitz und das Steinbeis-Forschungszentrum Systementwurf und Test.
Der Workshop hat es sich zum Ziel gesetzt, neueste Trends, Ergebnisse und aktuelle Probleme auf dem Gebiet der Methoden zur Modellierung und Verifikation sowie der Beschreibungssprachen digitaler, analoger und Mixed-Signal-Schaltungen zu diskutieren. Er soll somit ein Forum zum Ideenaustausch sein.
Weiterhin bietet der Workshop eine Plattform für den Austausch zwischen Forschung und Industrie sowie zur Pflege bestehender und zur Knüpfung neuer Kontakte. Jungen Wissenschaftlern erlaubt er, ihre Ideen und Ansätze einem breiten Publikum aus Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft zu präsentieren und im Rahmen der Veranstaltung auch fundiert zu diskutieren. Sein langjähriges Bestehen hat ihn zu einer festen Größe in vielen Veranstaltungskalendern gemacht. Traditionell sind auch die Treffen der ITGFachgruppen an den Workshop angegliedert.
In diesem Jahr nutzen zwei im Rahmen der InnoProfile-Transfer-Initiative durch das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung geförderte Projekte den Workshop, um in zwei eigenen Tracks ihre Forschungsergebnisse einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren. Vertreter der Projekte Generische Plattform für Systemzuverlässigkeit und Verifikation (GPZV) und GINKO - Generische Infrastruktur zur nahtlosen energetischen Kopplung von Elektrofahrzeugen stellen Teile ihrer gegenwärtigen Arbeiten vor. Dies bereichert denWorkshop durch zusätzliche Themenschwerpunkte und bietet eine wertvolle Ergänzung zu den Beiträgen der Autoren. [... aus dem Vorwort
Multilevel simulation-based co-design of next generation HPC microprocessors
This paper demonstrates the combined use of three simulation tools in support of a co-design methodology for an HPC-focused System-on-a-Chip (SoC) design. The simulation tools make different trade-offs between simulation speed, accuracy and model abstraction level, and are shown to be complementary. We apply the MUSA trace-based simulator for the initial sizing of vector register length, system-level cache (SLC) size and memory bandwidth. It has proven to be very efficient at pruning the design space, as its models enable sufficient accuracy without having to resort to highly detailed simulations. Then we apply gem5, a cycle-accurate micro-architecture simulator, for a more refined analysis of the performance potential of our reference SoC architecture, with models able to capture detailed hardware behavior at the cost of simulation speed. Furthermore, we study the network-on-chip (NoC) topology and IP placements using both gem5 for representative small- to medium-scale configurations and SESAM/VPSim, a transaction-level emulator for larger scale systems with good simulation speed and sufficient architectural details. Overall, we consider several system design concerns, such as processor subsystem sizing and NoC settings. We apply the selected simulation tools, focusing on different levels of abstraction, to study several configurations with various design concerns and evaluate them to guide architectural design and optimization decisions. Performance analysis is carried out with a number of representative benchmarks. The obtained numerical results provide guidance and hints to designers regarding SIMD instruction width, SLC sizing, memory bandwidth as well as the best placement of memory controllers and NoC form factor. Thus, we provide critical insights for efficient design of future HPC microprocessors.This work has been performed in the context of the European Processor Initiative (EPI) project, which has received
funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research
and innovation program under Grant Agreement № 826647.
A special thanks to Amir Charif and Arief Wicaksana for
their invaluable contributions to the SESAM/VPSim tool in
the initial phases of the EPI project.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Modeling Power Consumption and Temperature in TLM Models
International audienceMany techniques and tools exist to estimate the power consumption and the temperature map of a chip. These tools help the hardware designers develop power efficient chips in the presence of temperature constraints. For this task, the application can be ignored or at least abstracted by some high level scenarios; at this stage, the actual embedded software is generally not available yet. However, after the hardware is defined, the embedded software can still have a significant influence on the power consumption; i.e., two implementations of the same application can consume more or less power. Moreover, the actual software powe
Re-use of tests and arguments for assesing dependable mixed-critically systems
The safety assessment of mixed-criticality systems (MCS) is a challenging activity due to system heterogeneity, design constraints and increasing complexity. The foundation for MCSs is the integrated architecture paradigm, where a compact hardware comprises multiple execution platforms and communication interfaces to implement concurrent functions with different safety requirements. Besides a computing platform providing adequate isolation and fault tolerance mechanism, the development of an MCS application shall also comply with the guidelines defined by the safety standards. A way to lower the overall MCS certification cost is to adopt a platform-based design (PBD) development approach. PBD is a model-based development (MBD) approach, where separate models of logic, hardware and deployment support the analysis of the resulting system properties and behaviour. The PBD development of MCSs benefits from a composition of modular safety properties (e.g. modular safety cases), which support the derivation of mixed-criticality product lines.
The validation and verification (V&V) activities claim a substantial effort during the development of programmable electronics for safety-critical applications. As for the MCS dependability assessment, the purpose of the V&V is to provide evidences supporting the safety claims. The model-based development of MCSs adds more V&V tasks, because
additional analysis (e.g., simulations) need to be carried out during the design phase. During the MCS integration phase, typically hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) plant simulators support the V&V campaigns, where test automation and fault-injection are the key to test repeatability and thorough exercise of the safety mechanisms.
This dissertation proposes several V&V artefacts re-use strategies to perform an early verification at system level for a distributed MCS, artefacts that later would be reused up to the final stages in the development process: a test code re-use to verify the fault-tolerance mechanisms on a functional model of the system combined with a non-intrusive software fault-injection, a model to X-in-the-loop (XiL) and code-to-XiL re-use to provide models of the plant and distributed embedded nodes suited to the HiL simulator, and finally, an argumentation framework to support the automated composition and staged completion of modular safety-cases for dependability assessment, in the context of the platform-based development of mixed-criticality systems relying on the DREAMS harmonized platform.La dificultad para evaluar la seguridad de los sistemas de criticidad mixta (SCM) aumenta con la heterogeneidad del sistema, las restricciones de diseño y una complejidad creciente. Los SCM adoptan el paradigma de arquitectura integrada, donde un hardware embebido compacto comprende múltiples plataformas de ejecución e interfaces de comunicación para implementar funciones concurrentes y con diferentes requisitos de seguridad. Además de una plataforma de computación que provea un aislamiento y mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos adecuados, el desarrollo de una aplicación SCM además debe cumplir con las directrices definidas por las normas de seguridad. Una forma de reducir el coste global de la certificación de un SCM es adoptar un enfoque de desarrollo basado en plataforma (DBP). DBP es un enfoque de desarrollo basado en modelos (DBM), en el que modelos separados de lógica, hardware y despliegue soportan el análisis de las propiedades y el comportamiento emergente del sistema diseñado. El desarrollo DBP de SCMs se beneficia de una composición modular de propiedades de seguridad (por ejemplo, casos de seguridad modulares), que facilitan la definición de líneas de productos de criticidad mixta.
Las actividades de verificación y validación (V&V) representan un esfuerzo sustancial durante el desarrollo de aplicaciones basadas en electrónica confiable. En la evaluación de la seguridad de un SCM el propósito de las actividades de V&V es obtener las evidencias que apoyen las aseveraciones de seguridad. El desarrollo basado en modelos de un SCM incrementa las tareas de V&V, porque permite realizar análisis adicionales (por ejemplo, simulaciones) durante la fase de diseño. En las campañas de pruebas de integración de un SCM habitualmente se emplean simuladores de planta hardware-in-the-loop (HiL), en donde la automatización de pruebas y la inyección de faltas son la clave para la repetitividad de las pruebas y para ejercitar completamente los mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos.
Esta tesis propone diversas estrategias de reutilización de artefactos de V&V para la verificación temprana de un MCS distribuido, artefactos que se emplearán en ulteriores fases del desarrollo: la reutilización de código de prueba para verificar los mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos sobre un modelo funcional del sistema combinado con una inyección de fallos de software no intrusiva, la reutilización de modelo a X-in-the-loop (XiL) y código a XiL para obtener modelos de planta y nodos distribuidos aptos para el simulador HiL y, finalmente, un marco de argumentación para la composición automatizada y la compleción escalonada de casos de seguridad modulares, en el contexto del desarrollo basado en plataformas de sistemas de criticidad mixta empleando la plataforma armonizada DREAMS.Kritikotasun nahastuko sistemen segurtasun ebaluazioa jarduera neketsua da beraien heterogeneotasuna dela eta. Sistema hauen oinarria arkitektura integratuen paradigman datza, non hardware konpaktu batek exekuzio plataforma eta komunikazio interfaze ugari integratu ahal dituen segurtasun baldintza desberdineko funtzio konkurrenteak inplementatzeko. Konputazio plataformek isolamendu eta akatsen aurkako mekanismo egokiak emateaz gain, segurtasun arauek definituriko jarraibideak jarraitu behar dituzte kritikotasun mistodun aplikazioen garapenean. Sistema hauen zertifikazio prozesuaren kostua murrizteko aukera bat plataformetan oinarritutako garapenean (PBD) datza. Garapen
planteamendu hau modeloetan oinarrituriko garapena da (MBD) non modeloaren logika, hardware eta garapen desberdinak sistemaren propietateen eta portaeraren aurka aztertzen diren. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen PBD garapenak etekina ateratzen dio moduluetan oinarrituriko segurtasun propietateei, adibidez: segurtasun kasu modularrak (MSC). Modulu
hauek kritikotasun mistodun produktu-lerroak ere hartzen dituzte kontutan.
Berifikazio eta balioztatze (V&V) jarduerek esfortzu kontsideragarria eskatzen dute segurtasun-kiritikoetarako elektronika programagarrien garapenean. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen konfiantzaren ebaluazioaren eta V&V jardueren helburua segurtasun eskariak jasotzen dituzten frogak proportzionatzea da. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen modelo
bidezko garapenek zeregin gehigarriak atxikitzen dizkio V&V jarduerari, fase honetan analisi gehigarriak (hots, simulazioak) zehazten direlako. Bestalde, kritikotasun mistodun sistemen integrazio fasean, hardware-in-the-loop (Hil) simulazio plantek V&V iniziatibak sostengatzen dituzte non testen automatizazioan eta akatsen txertaketan funtsezko jarduerak diren.
Jarduera hauek frogen errepikapena eta segurtasun mekanismoak egiaztzea ahalbidetzen dute.
Tesi honek V&V artefaktuen berrerabilpenerako estrategiak proposatzen ditu, kritikotasun mistodun sistemen egiaztatze azkarrerako sistema mailan eta garapen prozesuko azken faseetaraino erabili daitezkeenak. Esate baterako, test kodearen berrabilpena akats aurkako mekanismoak egiaztatzeko, modelotik X-in-the-loop (XiL)-ra eta kodetik XiL-rako
konbertsioa HiL simulaziorako eta argumentazio egitura bat DREAMS Europear proiektuan definituriko arkitektura estiloan oinarrituriko segurtasun kasu modularrak automatikoki eta gradualki sortzeko
Hybrid prototyping of multicore embedded systems
Multicore platforms are becoming increasingly pervasive in modern embedded systems. System level modeling techniques have enabled creation of fast software models of multicore platforms, commonly known as Virtual Prototypes, for early functional validation of embedded software, before the hardware is available. On the other hand, for accurate performance validation, the complete multicore platform can be implemented as a physical prototype on FPGA. Both virtual platforms and FPGA prototypes have their respective pros and cons. Virtual platforms have the advantage of high speed functional simulation and, typically, scale well with the number of cores. However, the accuracy of performance estimation is sacrificed. FPGA prototypes provide cycle-accurate performance estimation, because the software executes directly on an FPGA implementation of the target cores. However, it takes a significant amount of time to design, implement and test the inter-core communication architecture on the FPGA.
In this thesis we propose to design a novel system-level modeling framework, called Hybrid Prototyping. Our goal is to provide the benefits of both virtual platforms and FPGA prototypes. It aims to provide early, fast, and scalable models, similar to virtual platforms, along with the cycle-accuracy of FPGA prototypes. Using hybrid prototyping, embedded software designers will be able to create concurrent applications and accurately analyze the performance implication of their optimizations before the chip is delivered. At the same time, multicore architects will be able to modify the platform model without having to do full system prototyping. Therefore, hybrid prototyping will enable early and reliable multicore embedded system design, resulting in huge productivity gains for both embedded software designers and multicore chip architects
Recommended from our members
Design and Optimization of Networks-on-Chip for Future Heterogeneous Systems-on-Chip
Due to the tight power budget and reduced time-to-market, Systems-on-Chip (SoC) have emerged as a power-efficient solution that provides the functionality required by target applications in embedded systems. To support a diverse set of applications such as real-time video/audio processing and sensor signal processing, SoCs consist of multiple heterogeneous components, such as software processors, digital signal processors, and application-specific hardware accelerators. These components offer different flexibility, power, and performance values so that SoCs can be designed by mix-and-matching them.
With the increased amount of heterogeneous cores, however, the traditional interconnects in an SoC exhibit excessive power dissipation and poor performance scalability. As an alternative, Networks-on-Chip (NoC) have been proposed. NoCs provide modularity at design-time because
communications among the cores are isolated from their computations via standard interfaces. NoCs also exploit communication parallelism at run-time because multiple data can be transferred simultaneously.
In order to construct an efficient NoC, the communication behaviors of various heterogeneous components in an SoC must be considered with the large amount of NoC design parameters. Therefore, providing an efficient NoC design and optimization framework is critical to reduce the design
cycle and address the complexity of future heterogeneous SoCs. This is the thesis of my dissertation.
Some existing design automation tools for NoCs support very limited degrees of automation that cannot satisfy the requirements of future heterogeneous SoCs. First, these tools only support a limited number of NoC design parameters. Second, they do not provide an integrated environment for software-hardware co-development.
Thus, I propose FINDNOC, an integrated framework for the generation, optimization, and validation of NoCs for future heterogeneous SoCs. The proposed framework supports software-hardware co-development, incremental NoC design-decision model, SystemC-based NoC customization and generation, and fast system protyping with FPGA emulations.
Virtual channels (VC) and multiple physical (MP) networks are the two main alternative methods to provide better performance, support quality-of-service, and avoid protocol deadlocks in packet-switched NoC design. To examine the effect of using VCs and MPs with other NoC architectural
parameters, I completed a comprehensive comparative analysis that combines an analytical model, synthesis-based designs for both FPGAs and standard-cell libraries, and system-level simulations.
Based on the results of this analysis, I developed VENTTI, a design and simulation environment that combines a virtual platform (VP), a NoC synthesis tool, and four NoC models characterized at different abstraction levels. VENTTI facilitates an incremental decision-making process with four
NoC abstraction models associated with different NoC parameters. The selected NoC parameters can be validated by running simulations with the corresponding model instantiated in the VP.
I augmented this framework to complete FINDNOC by implementing ICON, a NoC generation and customization tool that dynamically combines and customizes synthesizable SystemC components from a predesigned library. Thanks to its flexibility and automatic network interface generation
capabilities, ICON can generate a rich variety of NoCs that can be then integrated into any Embedded Scalable Platform (ESP) architectures for fast prototying with FPGA emulations.
I designed FINDNOC in a modular way that makes it easy to augmenting it with new capabilities. This, combined with the continuous progress of the ESP design methodology, will provide a seamless SoC integration framework, where the hardware accelerators, software applications, and
NoCs can be designed, validated, and integrated simultaneously, in order to reduce the design cycle of future SoC platforms
- …