Scheduling and Fluid Routing for Flow-Based Microfluidic Laboratories-on-a-Chip

Microfluidic laboratories-on-a-chip (LoCs) are replacing the conventional biochemical analyzers and are able to integrate the necessary functions for biochemical analysis on-chip. There are several types of LoCs, each having its advantages and limitations. In this paper we are interested in flow-based LoCs, in which a continuous flow of liquid is manipulated using integrated microvalves. By combining several microvalves, more complex units, such as micropumps, switches, mixers, and multiplexers, can be built. We consider that the architecture of the LoC is given, and we are interested in synthesizing an implementation, consisting of the binding of operations in the application to the functional units of the architecture, the scheduling of operations and the routing and scheduling of the fluid flows, such that the application completion time is minimized. To solve this problem, we propose a list scheduling-based application mapping (LSAM) framework and evaluate it by using real-life as well as synthetic benchmarks. When biochemical applications contain fluids that may adsorb on the substrate on which they are transported, the solution is to use rinsing operations for contamination avoidance. Hence, we also propose a rinsing heuristic, which has been integrated in the LSAM framework

Computer-aided design for multilayer microfluidic chips

Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2009.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 63-66).Microfluidic chips fabricated by multilayer soft lithography are emerging as "lab-on-a-chip" systems that can automate biological experiments. As we are able to build more complex microfluidic chips with thousands of components, it becomes possible to build devices which can be programmatically changed to solve multiple problems. However, the current design methodology does not scale. In this thesis, we introduce design automation techniques to multilayer soft lithography microfluidics. Our work focuses on automating the design of the control layer. We present a method to define an Instruction Set Architecture as a hierarchical composition of flows. From this specification, we automatically infer and generate the logic and signals to control the chip. To complete the design automation of the control layer, we suggest a routing algorithm to connect control channels to peripheral I/O ports. To the microfluidic community, we offer a free computer-aided design tool, Micado, which implements our ideas for automation in a practical plug-in to AutoCAD. We have evaluated our work on real chips and our tool has been used successfully by microfluidic designers.by Nada Amin.M.Eng

MakerFluidics: low cost microfluidics for synthetic biology

Recent advancements in multilayer, multicellular, genetic logic circuits often rely on manual intervention throughout the computation cycle and orthogonal signals for each chemical “wire”. These constraints can prevent genetic circuits from scaling. Microfluidic devices can be used to mitigate these constraints. However, continuous-flow microfluidics are largely designed through artisanal processes involving hand-drawing features and accomplishing design rule checks visually: processes that are also inextensible. Additionally, continuous-flow microfluidic routing is only a consideration during chip design and, once built, the routing structure becomes “frozen in silicon,” or for many microfluidic chips “frozen in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)”; any changes to fluid routing often require an entirely new device and control infrastructure. The cost of fabricating and controlling a new device is high in terms of time and money; attempts to reduce one cost measure are, generally, paid through increases in the other. This work has three main thrusts: to create a microfluidic fabrication framework, called MakerFluidics, that lowers the barrier to entry for designing and fabricating microfluidics in a manner amenable to automation; to prove this methodology can design, fabricate, and control complex and novel microfluidic devices; and to demonstrate the methodology can be used to solve biologically-relevant problems. Utilizing accessible technologies, rapid prototyping, and scalable design practices, the MakerFluidics framework has demonstrated its ability to design, fabricate and control novel, complex and scalable microfludic devices. This was proven through the development of a reconfigurable, continuous-flow routing fabric driven by a modular, scalable primitive called a transposer. In addition to creating complex microfluidic networks, MakerFluidics was deployed in support of cutting-edge, application-focused research at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. Informed by a design of experiments approach using the parametric rapid prototyping capabilities made possible by MakerFluidics, a plastic blood--bacteria separation device was optimized, demonstrating that the new device geometry can separate bacteria from blood while operating at 275% greater flow rate as well as reduce the power requirement by 82% for equivalent separation performance when compared to the state of the art. Ultimately, MakerFluidics demonstrated the ability to design, fabricate, and control complex and practical microfluidic devices while lowering the barrier to entry to continuous-flow microfluidics, thus democratizing cutting edge technology beyond a handful of well-resourced and specialized labs

Exploring Microfluidic Design Automation: Thin-wall Membrane Regulator

Microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip are a growing technology, influential in many areas of engineering. This project focuses on the necessity for better computer aided design tools for this area. Specifically, it focuses on the automated synthesis of T-junction components with thin-walled membranes for stability. A T-junction is a passive droplet generation component, common in microfluidics which suffers from behavior instability in highly integrated circuits with many components. One way of improving stability is using flexible membranes to mitigate pressure perturbations. This thesis describes the design process of such membranes so that a model can be used to synthesize stable T-junctions. The thesis also discusses Manifold, a software framework for automated synthesis of microfluidic circuits. This is the framework where the design process fits in. To compare the result of the software framework with the analytic model described, physical circuits were fabricated to validate the accuracy of the analytic model and the software. Besides the T-junction, another microfluidics component that was investigated was a “Capillary Electrophoresis Channel”. This component was also investigated with respect to automated synthesis and verification using the Manifold framework, and the details are discussed

Placement and routing for cross-referencing digital microfluidic biochips.

Xiao, Zigang."October 2010."Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 62-66).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.iAcknowledgement --- p.viChapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Microfluidic Technology --- p.2Chapter 1.1.1 --- Continuous Flow Microfluidic System --- p.2Chapter 1.1.2 --- Digital Microfluidic System --- p.2Chapter 1.2 --- Pin-Constrained Biochips --- p.4Chapter 1.2.1 --- Droplet-Trace-Based Array Partitioning Method --- p.5Chapter 1.2.2 --- Broadcast-addressing Method --- p.5Chapter 1.2.3 --- Cross-Referencing Method --- p.6Chapter 1.2.3.1 --- Electrode Interference in Cross-Referencing Biochips --- p.7Chapter 1.3 --- Computer-Aided Design Techniques for Biochip --- p.8Chapter 1.4 --- Placement Problem in Biochips --- p.8Chapter 1.5 --- Droplet Routing Problem in Cross-Referencing Biochips --- p.11Chapter 1.6 --- Our Contributions --- p.14Chapter 1.7 --- Thesis Organization --- p.15Chapter 2 --- Literature Review --- p.16Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.16Chapter 2.2 --- Previous Works on Placement --- p.17Chapter 2.2.1 --- Basic Simulated Annealing --- p.17Chapter 2.2.2 --- Unified Synthesis Approach --- p.18Chapter 2.2.3 --- Droplet-Routing-Aware Unified Synthesis Approach --- p.19Chapter 2.2.4 --- Simulated Annealing Using T-tree Representation --- p.20Chapter 2.3 --- Previous Works on Routing --- p.21Chapter 2.3.1 --- Direct-Addressing Droplet Routing --- p.22Chapter 2.3.1.1 --- A* Search Method --- p.22Chapter 2.3.1.2 --- Open Shortest Path First Method --- p.23Chapter 2.3.1.3 --- A Two Phase Algorithm --- p.24Chapter 2.3.1.4 --- Network-Flow Based Method --- p.25Chapter 2.3.1.5 --- Bypassibility and Concession Method --- p.26Chapter 2.3.2 --- Cross-Referencing Droplet Routing --- p.28Chapter 2.3.2.1 --- Graph Coloring Method --- p.28Chapter 2.3.2.2 --- Clique Partitioning Method --- p.30Chapter 2.3.2.3 --- Progressive-ILP Method --- p.31Chapter 2.4 --- Conclusion --- p.32Chapter 3 --- CrossRouter for Cross-Referencing Biochip --- p.33Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.33Chapter 3.2 --- Problem Formulation --- p.34Chapter 3.3 --- Overview of Our Method --- p.35Chapter 3.4 --- Net Order Computation --- p.35Chapter 3.5 --- Propagation Stage --- p.36Chapter 3.5.1 --- Fluidic Constraint Check --- p.38Chapter 3.5.2 --- Electrode Constraint Check --- p.38Chapter 3.5.3 --- Handling 3-pin net --- p.44Chapter 3.5.4 --- Waste Reservoir --- p.45Chapter 3.6 --- Backtracking Stage --- p.45Chapter 3.7 --- Rip-up and Re-route Nets --- p.45Chapter 3.8 --- Experimental Results --- p.46Chapter 3.9 --- Conclusion --- p.47Chapter 4 --- Placement in Cross-Referencing Biochip --- p.49Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.49Chapter 4.2 --- Problem Formulation --- p.50Chapter 4.3 --- Overview of the method --- p.50Chapter 4.4 --- Dispenser and Reservoir Location Generation --- p.51Chapter 4.5 --- Solving Placement Problem Using ILP --- p.51Chapter 4.5.1 --- Constraints --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.1 --- Validity of modules --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.2 --- Non-overlapping and separation of Modules --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.3 --- Droplet-Routing length constraint --- p.54Chapter 4.5.1.4 --- Optical detector resource constraint --- p.55Chapter 4.5.2 --- Objective --- p.55Chapter 4.5.3 --- Problem Partition --- p.56Chapter 4.6 --- Pin Assignment --- p.56Chapter 4.7 --- Experimental Results --- p.57Chapter 4.8 --- Conclusion --- p.59Chapter 5 --- Conclusion --- p.60Bibliography --- p.6