3,395 research outputs found
Dynamically typed languages
Dynamically typed languages such as Python and Ruby have experienced a rapid grown in popularity in recent times. However, there is much confusion as to what makes these languages interesting relative to statically typed languages, and little knowledge of their rich history. In this chapter I explore the general topic of dynamically typed languages, how they differ from statically typed languages, their history, and their defining features
Linguistic Reflection in Java
Reflective systems allow their own structures to be altered from within. Here
we are concerned with a style of reflection, called linguistic reflection,
which is the ability of a running program to generate new program fragments and
to integrate these into its own execution. In particular we describe how this
kind of reflection may be provided in the compiler-based, strongly typed
object-oriented programming language Java. The advantages of the programming
technique include attaining high levels of genericity and accommodating system
evolution. These advantages are illustrated by an example taken from persistent
programming which shows how linguistic reflection allows functionality (program
code) to be generated on demand (Just-In-Time) from a generic specification and
integrated into the evolving running program. The technique is evaluated
against alternative implementation approaches with respect to efficiency,
safety and ease of use.Comment: 25 pages. Source code for examples at
http://www-ppg.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/Java/ReflectionExample/ Dynamic compilation
package at http://www-ppg.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/Java/DynamicCompilation
Combining behavioural types with security analysis
Today's software systems are highly distributed and interconnected, and they
increasingly rely on communication to achieve their goals; due to their
societal importance, security and trustworthiness are crucial aspects for the
correctness of these systems. Behavioural types, which extend data types by
describing also the structured behaviour of programs, are a widely studied
approach to the enforcement of correctness properties in communicating systems.
This paper offers a unified overview of proposals based on behavioural types
which are aimed at the analysis of security properties
Trust, but Verify: Two-Phase Typing for Dynamic Languages
A key challenge when statically typing so-called dynamic languages is the
ubiquity of value-based overloading, where a given function can dynamically
reflect upon and behave according to the types of its arguments. Thus, to
establish basic types, the analysis must reason precisely about values, but in
the presence of higher-order functions and polymorphism, this reasoning itself
can require basic types. In this paper we address this chicken-and-egg problem
by introducing the framework of two-phased typing. The first "trust" phase
performs classical, i.e. flow-, path- and value-insensitive type checking to
assign basic types to various program expressions. When the check inevitably
runs into "errors" due to value-insensitivity, it wraps problematic expressions
with DEAD-casts, which explicate the trust obligations that must be discharged
by the second phase. The second phase uses refinement typing, a flow- and
path-sensitive analysis, that decorates the first phase's types with logical
predicates to track value relationships and thereby verify the casts and
establish other correctness properties for dynamically typed languages
- …