An EWMA control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Giner-Bosch, V, Tran, KP, Castagliola, P, Khoo, MBC. An EWMA control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2019; 35: 1515-1541, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2459. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.[EN] Monitoring the multivariate coefficient of variation over time is a natural choice when the focus is on stabilising the relative variability of a multivariate process, as is the case in a significant number of real situations in engineering, health sciences, and finance, to name but a few areas. However, not many tools are available to practitioners with this aim. This paper introduces a new control chart to monitor the multivariate coefficient of variation through an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) scheme. Concrete methodologies to calculate the limits and evaluate the performance of the chart proposed and determine the optimal values of the chart's parameters are derived based on a theoretical study of the statistic being monitored. Computational experiments reveal that our proposal clearly outperforms existing alternatives, in terms of the average run length to detect an out-of-control state. A numerical example is included to show the efficiency of our chart when operating in practice.Generalitat Valenciana, Grant/Award Number: BEST/2017/033 and GV/2016/004; Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Grant/Award Number: MTM2013-45381-PGiner-Bosch, V.; Tran, KP.; Castagliola, P.; Khoo, MBC. (2019). An EWMA control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 35(6):1515-1541. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2459S15151541356Kang, C. W., Lee, M. S., Seong, Y. J., & Hawkins, D. M. (2007). A Control Chart for the Coefficient of Variation. Journal of Quality Technology, 39(2), 151-158. doi:10.1080/00224065.2007.11917682Amdouni, A., Castagliola, P., Taleb, H., & Celano, G. (2015). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart in short production runs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1-4), 1-14. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7084-4Amdouni, A., Castagliola, P., Taleb, H., & Celano, G. (2017). A variable sampling interval Shewhart control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. International Journal of Production Research, 55(19), 5521-5536. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1285076Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Tham, L. K., Teoh, W. L., & Rahim, M. A. (2017). Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation Using a Variable Sampling Interval EWMA Chart. Journal of Quality Technology, 49(4), 380-401. doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11918004Teoh, W. L., Khoo, M. B. C., Castagliola, P., Yeong, W. C., & Teh, S. Y. (2017). Run-sum control charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 144-158. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.067Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49-58. doi:10.3905/jpm.1994.409501Van Valen, L. (1974). Multivariate structural statistics in natural history. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 45(1), 235-247. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90053-8Albert, A., & Zhang, L. (2010). A novel definition of the multivariate coefficient of variation. Biometrical Journal, 52(5), 667-675. doi:10.1002/bimj.201000030Aerts, S., Haesbroeck, G., & Ruwet, C. (2015). Multivariate coefficients of variation: Comparison and influence functions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 142, 183-198. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2015.08.006Bennett, B. M. (1977). On multivariate coefficients of variation. Statistische Hefte, 18(2), 123-128. doi:10.1007/bf02932744Underhill, L. G. (1990). The coefficient of variation biplot. Journal of Classification, 7(2), 241-256. doi:10.1007/bf01908718Boik, R. J., & Shirvani, A. (2009). Principal components on coefficient of variation matrices. Statistical Methodology, 6(1), 21-46. doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2008.02.006MacGregor, J. F., & Kourti, T. (1995). Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Engineering Practice, 3(3), 403-414. doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)00014-lBersimis, S., Psarakis, S., & Panaretos, J. (2007). Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(5), 517-543. doi:10.1002/qre.829Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Castagliola, P. (2015). A Control Chart for the Multivariate Coefficient of Variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 1213-1225. doi:10.1002/qre.1828Lim, A. J. X., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Haq, A. (2017). Run sum chart for monitoring multivariate coefficient of variation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109, 84-95. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.023Roberts, S. W. (1966). A Comparison of Some Control Chart Procedures. Technometrics, 8(3), 411-430. doi:10.1080/00401706.1966.10490374Roberts, S. W. (1959). Control Chart Tests Based on Geometric Moving Averages. Technometrics, 1(3), 239-250. doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860Lucas, J. M., & Saccucci, M. S. (1990). Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Schemes: Properties and Enhancements. Technometrics, 32(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/00401706.1990.10484583Wijsman, R. A. (1957). Random Orthogonal Transformations and their use in Some Classical Distribution Problems in Multivariate Analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28(2), 415-423. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706969The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. (1928). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 121(788), 654-673. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0224Paolella, M. S. (2007). Intermediate Probability. doi:10.1002/9780470035061WalckC.Handbook on statistical distributions for experimentalists. Tech. Rep. SUFPFY/96‐01 Stockholm   Particle Physics Group Fysikum University of Stockholm;2007. http://inspirehep.net/record/1389910BROOK, D., & EVANS, D. A. (1972). An approach to the probability distribution of cusum run length. Biometrika, 59(3), 539-549. doi:10.1093/biomet/59.3.539Castagliola, P., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2011). Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation Using EWMA Charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 43(3), 249-265. doi:10.1080/00224065.2011.11917861Vining, G. (2009). Technical Advice: Phase I and Phase II Control Charts. Quality Engineering, 21(4), 478-479. doi:10.1080/08982110903185736Scilab Enterprises: Scilab: Free and open source software for numerical computation Version 6.0.0.http://www.scilab.org;2017.Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965). A Simplex Method for Function Minimization. The Computer Journal, 7(4), 308-313. doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308PAGE, E. S. (1954). CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES. Biometrika, 41(1-2), 100-115. doi:10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100Über die hypergeometrische Reihe . (1836). Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 1836(15), 39-83. doi:10.1515/crll.1836.15.3

Quantitative infrared thermography resolved leakage current problem in cathodic protection system

Leakage current problem can happen in Cathodic Protection (CP) system installation. It could affect the performance of underground facilities such as piping, building structure, and earthing system. Worse can happen is rapid corrosion where disturbance to plant operation plus expensive maintenance cost. Occasionally, if it seems, tracing its root cause could be tedious. The traditional method called line current measurement is still valid effective. It involves isolating one by one of the affected underground structures. The recent methods are Close Interval Potential Survey and Pipeline Current Mapper were better and faster. On top of the mentioned method, there is a need to enhance further by synthesizing with the latest visual methods. Therefore, this paper describes research works on Infrared Thermography Quantitative (IRTQ) method as resolution of leakage current problem in CP system. The scope of study merely focuses on tracing the root cause of leakage current occurring at the CP system lube base oil plant. The results of experiment adherence to the hypothesis drawn. Consequently, res

Performance comparison of the exact run-length distribution between the run sum X and EWMA X charts

The run sum (RS) X and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) X charts are very effective in detecting small and moderate process mean shifts. The design of the RS X and EWMA X charts based on the average run length (ARL) alone, can be misleading and confusing. This is due to the fact that the run-length distribution of a control chart is highly right-skewed when the process is in-control or slightly out-of-control; while that for the out-ofcontrol cases, the run-length distribution is almost symmetric. On the other hand, the percentiles of the run-length distribution provide the probability of getting a signal by a certain number of samples. This will benefit practitioners as the percentiles of the run-length distribution give comprehensive information regarding the behaviour of a control chart. Accordingly, this paper provides a thorough study of the run-length properties (ARL, standard deviation of the run length and percentiles of the run-length distribution) for the RS X and EWMA X charts. Comparative studies show that the EWMA X chart outperforms the RS X charts for detecting small mean shifts when all the control charts are optimized with respect to a small shift size. However, the RS X charts surpass the EWMA X chart for all sizes of mean shifts when all the control charts are optimized with respect to a large shift size

Control Charts and the Effect of the Two-Component Measurement Error Model

Monitoring algorithms, such as the Shewhart and Cusum control charts, are often used for monitoring purposes in the chemical industry or within an environmental context. The statistical properties of these algorithms are known to be highly responsive to measurement errors. Recent studies have underlined the important role played by the twocomponent measurement error model in chemical and environmental monitoring. In the present work, we study the effects of the twocomponent error model on the performance of the X and S Shewhart control charts. Results reveal that gauge imprecision may seriously alter the statistical properties of the control charts. We propose how to reduce the effects of measurement errors, and illustrate how to take errors into account in the design of monitoring algorithmsAverage run length, calibration curve, constant measurement error, Monte Carlo study, proportional measurement error, repeated measurements, Shewhart control charts

Life jacket

Anyone who cannot swim well should wear life jacket whether they are in the water or around the water. Even those who are can swim well should wear the life jacket when they are doing activity such as swimming, fishing, boating or while doing any water-related activity. Life jacket is a kind of safety jacket that keeping the wearer float the in the water. The wearer may be in the conscious or unconscious condition but by wearing the life jacket we can minimize the risk of drowning because life jacket assist the wearer to keep floating in the water