Inapproximability of Maximum Biclique Problems, Minimum kk-Cut and Densest At-Least-kk-Subgraph from the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis

The Small Set Expansion Hypothesis (SSEH) is a conjecture which roughly states that it is NP-hard to distinguish between a graph with a small subset of vertices whose edge expansion is almost zero and one in which all small subsets of vertices have expansion almost one. In this work, we prove inapproximability results for the following graph problems based on this hypothesis: - Maximum Edge Biclique (MEB): given a bipartite graph $G$, find a complete bipartite subgraph of $G$ with maximum number of edges. - Maximum Balanced Biclique (MBB): given a bipartite graph $G$, find a balanced complete bipartite subgraph of $G$ with maximum number of vertices. - Minimum $k$-Cut: given a weighted graph $G$, find a set of edges with minimum total weight whose removal partitions $G$ into $k$ connected components. - Densest At-Least-$k$-Subgraph (DAL$k$S): given a weighted graph $G$, find a set $S$ of at least $k$ vertices such that the induced subgraph on $S$ has maximum density (the ratio between the total weight of edges and the number of vertices). We show that, assuming SSEH and NP $\nsubseteq$ BPP, no polynomial time algorithm gives $n^{1 - \varepsilon}$-approximation for MEB or MBB for every constant $\varepsilon > 0$. Moreover, assuming SSEH, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate Minimum $k$-Cut and DAL$k$S to within $(2 - \varepsilon)$ factor of the optimum for every constant $\varepsilon > 0$. The ratios in our results are essentially tight since trivial algorithms give $n$-approximation to both MEB and MBB and efficient $2$-approximation algorithms are known for Minimum $k$-Cut [SV95] and DAL$k$S [And07, KS09]. Our first result is proved by combining a technique developed by Raghavendra et al. [RST12] to avoid locality of gadget reductions with a generalization of Bansal and Khot's long code test [BK09] whereas our second result is shown via elementary reductions.Comment: A preliminary version of this work will appear at ICALP 2017 under a different title "Inapproximability of Maximum Edge Biclique, Maximum Balanced Biclique and Minimum k-Cut from the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis

Finding Connected Dense kk-Subgraphs

Given a connected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and a positive integer $k\le n$, a subgraph of $G$ on $k$ vertices is called a $k$-subgraph in $G$. We design combinatorial approximation algorithms for finding a connected $k$-subgraph in $G$ such that its density is at least a factor $\Omega(\max\{n^{-2/5},k^2/n^2\})$ of the density of the densest $k$-subgraph in $G$ (which is not necessarily connected). These particularly provide the first non-trivial approximations for the densest connected $k$-subgraph problem on general graphs

Detecting High Log-Densities -- an O(n^1/4) Approximation for Densest k-Subgraph

In the Densest k-Subgraph problem, given a graph G and a parameter k, one needs to find a subgraph of G induced on k vertices that contains the largest number of edges. There is a significant gap between the best known upper and lower bounds for this problem. It is NP-hard, and does not have a PTAS unless NP has subexponential time algorithms. On the other hand, the current best known algorithm of Feige, Kortsarz and Peleg, gives an approximation ratio of n^(1/3-epsilon) for some specific epsilon > 0 (estimated at around 1/60). We present an algorithm that for every epsilon > 0 approximates the Densest k-Subgraph problem within a ratio of n^(1/4+epsilon) in time n^O(1/epsilon). In particular, our algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of O(n^1/4) in time n^O(log n). Our algorithm is inspired by studying an average-case version of the problem where the goal is to distinguish random graphs from graphs with planted dense subgraphs. The approximation ratio we achieve for the general case matches the distinguishing ratio we obtain for this planted problem. At a high level, our algorithms involve cleverly counting appropriately defined trees of constant size in G, and using these counts to identify the vertices of the dense subgraph. Our algorithm is based on the following principle. We say that a graph G(V,E) has log-density alpha if its average degree is Theta(|V|^alpha). The algorithmic core of our result is a family of algorithms that output k-subgraphs of nontrivial density whenever the log-density of the densest k-subgraph is larger than the log-density of the host graph.Comment: 23 page

A Novel Approach to Finding Near-Cliques: The Triangle-Densest Subgraph Problem

Many graph mining applications rely on detecting subgraphs which are near-cliques. There exists a dichotomy between the results in the existing work related to this problem: on the one hand the densest subgraph problem (DSP) which maximizes the average degree over all subgraphs is solvable in polynomial time but for many networks fails to find subgraphs which are near-cliques. On the other hand, formulations that are geared towards finding near-cliques are NP-hard and frequently inapproximable due to connections with the Maximum Clique problem. In this work, we propose a formulation which combines the best of both worlds: it is solvable in polynomial time and finds near-cliques when the DSP fails. Surprisingly, our formulation is a simple variation of the DSP. Specifically, we define the triangle densest subgraph problem (TDSP): given $G(V,E)$, find a subset of vertices $S^*$ such that $\tau(S^*)=\max_{S \subseteq V} \frac{t(S)}{|S|}$, where $t(S)$ is the number of triangles induced by the set $S$. We provide various exact and approximation algorithms which the solve the TDSP efficiently. Furthermore, we show how our algorithms adapt to the more general problem of maximizing the $k$-clique average density. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that the TDSP should be used whenever the output of the DSP fails to output a near-clique.Comment: 42 page