Language technologies for a multilingual Europe

This volume of the series “Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing” includes most of the papers presented at the Workshop “Language Technology for a Multilingual Europe”, held at the University of Hamburg on September 27, 2011 in the framework of the conference GSCL 2011 with the topic “Multilingual Resources and Multilingual Applications”, along with several additional contributions. In addition to an overview article on Machine Translation and two contributions on the European initiatives META-NET and Multilingual Web, the volume includes six full research articles. Our intention with this workshop was to bring together various groups concerned with the umbrella topics of multilingualism and language technology, especially multilingual technologies. This encompassed, on the one hand, representatives from research and development in the field of language technologies, and, on the other hand, users from diverse areas such as, among others, industry, administration and funding agencies. The Workshop “Language Technology for a Multilingual Europe” was co-organised by the two GSCL working groups “Text Technology” and “Machine Translation” (http://gscl.info) as well as by META-NET (http://www.meta-net.eu)

Bantu lexical reconstruction

Lexical reconstruction has been an important enterprise in Bantu historical linguistics since the earliest days of the discipline. In this chapter a historical overview is provided of the principal scholarly contributions to that field of study. It is also explained how the Comparative Method has been and can be applied to reconstruct ancestral Bantu vocabulary via the intermediate step of phonological reconstruction and how the study of sound change needs to be completed with diachronic semantics in order to correctly reconstruct both the form and the meaning of etymons. Finally, some issues complicating this type of historical linguistic research, such as “osculance” due to prehistoric language contact, are addressed, as well as the relationship between reconstruction and classification

Semi-automatic acquisition of domain-specific semantic structures.

Siu, Kai-Chung.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2000.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 99-106).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Thesis Outline --- p.5Chapter 2 --- Background --- p.6Chapter 2.1 --- Natural Language Understanding --- p.6Chapter 2.1.1 --- Rule-based Approaches --- p.7Chapter 2.1.2 --- Stochastic Approaches --- p.8Chapter 2.1.3 --- Phrase-Spotting Approaches --- p.9Chapter 2.2 --- Grammar Induction --- p.10Chapter 2.2.1 --- Semantic Classification Trees --- p.11Chapter 2.2.2 --- Simulated Annealing --- p.12Chapter 2.2.3 --- Bayesian Grammar Induction --- p.12Chapter 2.2.4 --- Statistical Grammar Induction --- p.13Chapter 2.3 --- Machine Translation --- p.14Chapter 2.3.1 --- Rule-based Approach --- p.15Chapter 2.3.2 --- Statistical Approach --- p.15Chapter 2.3.3 --- Example-based Approach --- p.16Chapter 2.3.4 --- Knowledge-based Approach --- p.16Chapter 2.3.5 --- Evaluation Method --- p.19Chapter 3 --- Semi-Automatic Grammar Induction --- p.20Chapter 3.1 --- Agglomerative Clustering --- p.20Chapter 3.1.1 --- Spatial Clustering --- p.21Chapter 3.1.2 --- Temporal Clustering --- p.24Chapter 3.1.3 --- Free Parameters --- p.26Chapter 3.2 --- Post-processing --- p.27Chapter 3.3 --- Chapter Summary --- p.29Chapter 4 --- Application to the ATIS Domain --- p.30Chapter 4.1 --- The ATIS Domain --- p.30Chapter 4.2 --- Parameters Selection --- p.32Chapter 4.3 --- Unsupervised Grammar Induction --- p.35Chapter 4.4 --- Prior Knowledge Injection --- p.40Chapter 4.5 --- Evaluation --- p.43Chapter 4.5.1 --- Parse Coverage in Understanding --- p.45Chapter 4.5.2 --- Parse Errors --- p.46Chapter 4.5.3 --- Analysis --- p.47Chapter 4.6 --- Chapter Summary --- p.49Chapter 5 --- Portability to Chinese --- p.50Chapter 5.1 --- Corpus Preparation --- p.50Chapter 5.1.1 --- Tokenization --- p.51Chapter 5.2 --- Experiments --- p.52Chapter 5.2.1 --- Unsupervised Grammar Induction --- p.52Chapter 5.2.2 --- Prior Knowledge Injection --- p.56Chapter 5.3 --- Evaluation --- p.58Chapter 5.3.1 --- Parse Coverage in Understanding --- p.59Chapter 5.3.2 --- Parse Errors --- p.60Chapter 5.4 --- Grammar Comparison Across Languages --- p.60Chapter 5.5 --- Chapter Summary --- p.64Chapter 6 --- Bi-directional Machine Translation --- p.65Chapter 6.1 --- Bilingual Dictionary --- p.67Chapter 6.2 --- Concept Alignments --- p.68Chapter 6.3 --- Translation Procedures --- p.73Chapter 6.3.1 --- The Matching Process --- p.74Chapter 6.3.2 --- The Searching Process --- p.76Chapter 6.3.3 --- Heuristics to Aid Translation --- p.81Chapter 6.4 --- Evaluation --- p.82Chapter 6.4.1 --- Coverage --- p.83Chapter 6.4.2 --- Performance --- p.86Chapter 6.5 --- Chapter Summary --- p.89Chapter 7 --- Conclusions --- p.90Chapter 7.1 --- Summary --- p.90Chapter 7.2 --- Future Work --- p.92Chapter 7.2.1 --- Suggested Improvements on Grammar Induction Process --- p.92Chapter 7.2.2 --- Suggested Improvements on Bi-directional Machine Trans- lation --- p.96Chapter 7.2.3 --- Domain Portability --- p.97Chapter 7.3 --- Contributions --- p.97Bibliography --- p.99Chapter A --- Original SQL Queries --- p.107Chapter B --- Induced Grammar --- p.109Chapter C --- Seeded Categories --- p.11

Language technologies for a multilingual Europe

This volume of the series “Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing” includes most of the papers presented at the Workshop “Language Technology for a Multilingual Europe”, held at the University of Hamburg on September 27, 2011 in the framework of the conference GSCL 2011 with the topic “Multilingual Resources and Multilingual Applications”, along with several additional contributions. In addition to an overview article on Machine Translation and two contributions on the European initiatives META-NET and Multilingual Web, the volume includes six full research articles. Our intention with this workshop was to bring together various groups concerned with the umbrella topics of multilingualism and language technology, especially multilingual technologies. This encompassed, on the one hand, representatives from research and development in the field of language technologies, and, on the other hand, users from diverse areas such as, among others, industry, administration and funding agencies. The Workshop “Language Technology for a Multilingual Europe” was co-organised by the two GSCL working groups “Text Technology” and “Machine Translation” (http://gscl.info) as well as by META-NET (http://www.meta-net.eu)

Combining translation into the second language and second language learning : an integrated computational approach

This thesis explores the area where translation and language learning intersects. However, this intersection is not one in the traditional sense of second language teaching: where translation is used as a means for learning a foreign language. This thesis treats translating into the foreign language as a separate entity, one that is as important as learning the foreign language itself. Thus the discussion in this thesis is especially relevant to an academic institution which contemplates training foreign language learners who can perform translation into the foreign language at a professional level. The thesis concentrates on developing a pedagogical model which can achieve the goal of fostering linguistic competence and translation competence at the same time. It argues that constructing such a model under a computerised framework is a viable approach, since the task of translation nowadays relies heavily on all kinds o

Teaching Machines to Ask Useful Clarification Questions

Inquiry is fundamental to communication, and machines cannot effectively collaborate with humans unless they can ask questions. Asking questions is also a natural way for machines to express uncertainty, a task of increasing importance in an automated society. In the field of natural language processing, despite decades of work on question answering, there is relatively little work in question asking. Moreover, most of the previous work has focused on generating reading comprehension style questions which are answerable from the provided text. The goal of my dissertation work, on the other hand, is to understand how can we teach machines to ask clarification questions that point at the missing information in a text. Primarily, we focus on two scenarios where we find such question asking to be useful: (1) clarification questions on posts found in community-driven technical support forums such as StackExchange (2) clarification questions on descriptions of products in e-retail platforms such as Amazon. In this dissertation we claim that, given large amounts of previously asked questions in various contexts (within a particular scenario), we can build machine learning models that can ask useful questions in a new unseen context (within the same scenario). In order to validate this hypothesis, we firstly create two large datasets of context paired with clarification question (and answer) for the two scenarios of technical support and e-retail by automatically extracting these information from available datadumps of StackExchange and Amazon. Given these datasets, in our first line of research, we build a machine learning model that first extracts a set of candidate clarification questions and then ranks them such that a more useful question would be higher up in the ranking. Our model is inspired by the idea of expected value of perfect information: a good question is one whose expected answer will be useful. We hypothesize that by explicitly modeling the value added by an answer to a given context, our model can learn to identify more useful questions. We evaluate our model against expert human judgments on the StackExchange dataset and demonstrate significant improvements over controlled baselines. In our second line of research, we build a machine learning model that learns to generate a new clarification question from scratch, instead of ranking previously seen questions. We hypothesize that we can train our model to generate good clarification questions by incorporating the usefulness of an answer to the clarification question into the recent sequence-to-sequence based neural network approaches. We develop a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) where the generator is a sequence-to-sequence model and the discriminator is a utility function that models the value of updating the context with the answer to the clarification question. We evaluate our model on our two datasets of StackExchange and Amazon, using both automatic metrics and human judgments of usefulness, specificity and relevance, showing that our approach outperforms both a retrieval-based model and ablations that exclude the utility model and the adversarial training. We observe that our question generation model generates questions that range a wide spectrum of specificity to the given context. We argue that generating questions at a desired level of specificity (to a given context) can be useful in many scenarios. In our last line of research we, therefore, build a question generation model which given a context and a level of specificity (generic or specific), generates a question at that level of specificity. We hypothesize that by providing the level of specificity of the question to our model during training time, it can learn patterns in the question that indicate the level of specificity and use those to generate questions at a desired level of specificity. To automatically label the large number of questions in our training data with the level of specificity, we train a binary classifier which given a context and a question, predicts whether the question is specific (to the context) or generic. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our specificity-controlled question generation model by evaluating it on the Amazon dataset using human judgements