Robustness Verification of Support Vector Machines

We study the problem of formally verifying the robustness to adversarial examples of support vector machines (SVMs), a major machine learning model for classification and regression tasks. Following a recent stream of works on formal robustness verification of (deep) neural networks, our approach relies on a sound abstract version of a given SVM classifier to be used for checking its robustness. This methodology is parametric on a given numerical abstraction of real values and, analogously to the case of neural networks, needs neither abstract least upper bounds nor widening operators on this abstraction. The standard interval domain provides a simple instantiation of our abstraction technique, which is enhanced with the domain of reduced affine forms, which is an efficient abstraction of the zonotope abstract domain. This robustness verification technique has been fully implemented and experimentally evaluated on SVMs based on linear and nonlinear (polynomial and radial basis function) kernels, which have been trained on the popular MNIST dataset of images and on the recent and more challenging Fashion-MNIST dataset. The experimental results of our prototype SVM robustness verifier appear to be encouraging: this automated verification is fast, scalable and shows significantly high percentages of provable robustness on the test set of MNIST, in particular compared to the analogous provable robustness of neural networks

Robustness Verification of k-Nearest Neighbor Classifiers by Abstract Interpretation

openAbstract interpretation is an established mathematical framework introduced by Cousot and Cousot in 1977 and ubiquitously used in static program analysis. In recent years, many noteworthy works have shown how abstract interpretation can be successfully applied to formally verify robustness properties of some major machine learning techniques like (deep) neural networks, decision trees and support vector machines. This research work aims to pursue this line of research by proposing a novel abstract interpretation-based framework for designing a sound abstract version of the k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithm, a well-known non-parametric supervised learning method widely used for classification and regression tasks, which is then instantiated to the standard interval domain approximating the range of numerical features, to verify its robustness and stability properties. This verification approach has been fully implemented and evaluated on several datasets, including standard benchmark datasets for individual fairness verification, and then compared with some related works finding adversarial examples on kNNs. The experimental results turned out to be very promising and showed high percentages of provable robustness and stability in most of the reference datasets, thus making a step forward in the current state-of-the-art of formal verification of machine learning models.Abstract interpretation is an established mathematical framework introduced by Cousot and Cousot in 1977 and ubiquitously used in static program analysis. In recent years, many noteworthy works have shown how abstract interpretation can be successfully applied to formally verify robustness properties of some major machine learning techniques like (deep) neural networks, decision trees and support vector machines. This research work aims to pursue this line of research by proposing a novel abstract interpretation-based framework for designing a sound abstract version of the k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithm, a well-known non-parametric supervised learning method widely used for classification and regression tasks, which is then instantiated to the standard interval domain approximating the range of numerical features, to verify its robustness and stability properties. This verification approach has been fully implemented and evaluated on several datasets, including standard benchmark datasets for individual fairness verification, and then compared with some related works finding adversarial examples on kNNs. The experimental results turned out to be very promising and showed high percentages of provable robustness and stability in most of the reference datasets, thus making a step forward in the current state-of-the-art of formal verification of machine learning models

Closed-Loop Statistical Verification of Stochastic Nonlinear Systems Subject to Parametric Uncertainties

This paper proposes a statistical verification framework using Gaussian processes (GPs) for simulation-based verification of stochastic nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties. Given a small number of stochastic simulations, the proposed framework constructs a GP regression model and predicts the system's performance over the entire set of possible uncertainties. Included in the framework is a new metric to estimate the confidence in those predictions based on the variance of the GP's cumulative distribution function. This variance-based metric forms the basis of active sampling algorithms that aim to minimize prediction error through careful selection of simulations. In three case studies, the new active sampling algorithms demonstrate up to a 35% improvement in prediction error over other approaches and are able to correctly identify regions with low prediction confidence through the variance metric.Comment: 8 pages, submitted to ACC 201

Qualitative Robustness of Support Vector Machines

Support vector machines have attracted much attention in theoretical and in applied statistics. Main topics of recent interest are consistency, learning rates and robustness. In this article, it is shown that support vector machines are qualitatively robust. Since support vector machines can be represented by a functional on the set of all probability measures, qualitative robustness is proven by showing that this functional is continuous with respect to the topology generated by weak convergence of probability measures. Combined with the existence and uniqueness of support vector machines, our results show that support vector machines are the solutions of a well-posed mathematical problem in Hadamard's sense

Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning

Learning-based pattern classifiers, including deep networks, have shown impressive performance in several application domains, ranging from computer vision to cybersecurity. However, it has also been shown that adversarial input perturbations carefully crafted either at training or at test time can easily subvert their predictions. The vulnerability of machine learning to such wild patterns (also referred to as adversarial examples), along with the design of suitable countermeasures, have been investigated in the research field of adversarial machine learning. In this work, we provide a thorough overview of the evolution of this research area over the last ten years and beyond, starting from pioneering, earlier work on the security of non-deep learning algorithms up to more recent work aimed to understand the security properties of deep learning algorithms, in the context of computer vision and cybersecurity tasks. We report interesting connections between these apparently-different lines of work, highlighting common misconceptions related to the security evaluation of machine-learning algorithms. We review the main threat models and attacks defined to this end, and discuss the main limitations of current work, along with the corresponding future challenges towards the design of more secure learning algorithms.Comment: Accepted for publication on Pattern Recognition, 201