Ability of stabilizer quantum error correction to protect itself from its own imperfection

The theory of stabilizer quantum error correction allows us to actively stabilize quantum states and simulate ideal quantum operations in a noisy environment. It is critical is to correctly diagnose noise from its syndrome and nullify it accordingly. However, hardware that performs quantum error correction itself is inevitably imperfect in practice. Here, we show that stabilizer codes possess a built-in capability of correcting errors not only on quantum information but also on faulty syndromes extracted by themselves. Shor's syndrome extraction for fault-tolerant quantum computation is naturally improved. This opens a path to realizing the potential of stabilizer quantum error correction hidden within an innocent looking choice of generators and stabilizer operators that have been deemed redundant.Comment: 9 pages, 3 tables, final accepted version for publication in Physical Review A (v2: improved main theorem, slightly expanded each section, reformatted for readability, v3: corrected an error and typos in the proof of Theorem 2, v4: edited language

Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Fault tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) networks are studied by a combination of numerical and approximate analytical treatments. The probability of failure of the recovery operation is calculated for a variety of CSS codes, including large block codes and concatenated codes. Recent insights into the syndrome extraction process, which render the whole process more efficient and more noise-tolerant, are incorporated. The average number of recoveries which can be completed without failure is thus estimated as a function of various parameters. The main parameters are the gate (gamma) and memory (epsilon) failure rates, the physical scale-up of the computer size, and the time t_m required for measurements and classical processing. The achievable computation size is given as a surface in parameter space. This indicates the noise threshold as well as other information. It is found that concatenated codes based on the [[23,1,7]] Golay code give higher thresholds than those based on the [[7,1,3]] Hamming code under most conditions. The threshold gate noise gamma_0 is a function of epsilon/gamma and t_m; example values are {epsilon/gamma, t_m, gamma_0} = {1, 1, 0.001}, {0.01, 1, 0.003}, {1, 100, 0.0001}, {0.01, 100, 0.002}, assuming zero cost for information transport. This represents an order of magnitude increase in tolerated memory noise, compared with previous calculations, which is made possible by recent insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process.Comment: 21 pages, 12 figures, minor mistakes corrected and layout improved, ref added; v4: clarification of assumption re logic gate

Correction of Data and Syndrome Errors by Stabilizer Codes

Performing active quantum error correction to protect fragile quantum states highly depends on the correctness of error information--error syndromes. To obtain reliable error syndromes using imperfect physical circuits, we propose the idea of quantum data-syndrome (DS) codes that are capable of correcting both data qubits and syndrome bits errors. We study fundamental properties of quantum DS codes and provide several CSS-type code constructions of quantum DS codes.Comment: 2 figures. This is a short version of our full paper (in preparation

Quantum convolutional data-syndrome codes

We consider performance of a simple quantum convolutional code in a fault-tolerant regime using several syndrome measurement/decoding strategies and three different error models, including the circuit model.Comment: Abstract submitted for The 20th IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC 2019

Fault-Tolerant Thresholds for Encoded Ancillae with Homogeneous Errors

I describe a procedure for calculating thresholds for quantum computation as a function of error model given the availability of ancillae prepared in logical states with independent, identically distributed errors. The thresholds are determined via a simple counting argument performed on a single qubit of an infinitely large CSS code. I give concrete examples of thresholds thus achievable for both Steane and Knill style fault-tolerant implementations and investigate their relation to threshold estimates in the literature.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables; v2 minor edits, v3 completely revised, submitted to PR

Efficient fault-tolerant quantum computing

Fault tolerant quantum computing methods which work with efficient quantum error correcting codes are discussed. Several new techniques are introduced to restrict accumulation of errors before or during the recovery. Classes of eligible quantum codes are obtained, and good candidates exhibited. This permits a new analysis of the permissible error rates and minimum overheads for robust quantum computing. It is found that, under the standard noise model of ubiquitous stochastic, uncorrelated errors, a quantum computer need be only an order of magnitude larger than the logical machine contained within it in order to be reliable. For example, a scale-up by a factor of 22, with gate error rate of order $10^{-5}$, is sufficient to permit large quantum algorithms such as factorization of thousand-digit numbers.Comment: 21 pages plus 5 figures. Replaced with figures in new format to avoid problem