686 research outputs found
Robust Optimization for Multiobjective Programming Problems with Imprecise Information
AbstractA robust optimization approach is proposed for generating nondominated robust solutions for multiobjective linear programming problems with imprecise coefficients in the objective functions and constraints. Robust optimization is used in dealing with impreciseness while an interactive procedure is used in eliciting preference information from the decision maker and in making tradeoffs among the multiple objectives. Robust augmented weighted Tchebycheff programs are formulated from the multiobjective linear programming model using the concept of budget of uncertainty. A linear counterpart of the robust augmented weighted Tchebycheff program is derived. Robust nondominated solutions are generated by solving the linearized counterpart of the robust augmented weighted Tchebycheff programs
Experts’ consensus to identify elements of career management competencies in Work-Based Learning (WBL) program using Fuzzy Delphi Analysis
This study aimed to obtain experts‘ opinion
and consensus on the elements of career management competencies that can
be developed through the Work-Based Learning (WBL) program in polytechnic
Multi crteria decision making and its applications : a literature review
This paper presents current techniques used in Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and their applications. Two basic approaches for MCDM, namely Artificial Intelligence MCDM (AIMCDM) and Classical MCDM (CMCDM) are discussed and investigated. Recent articles from international journals related to MCDM are collected and analyzed to find which approach is more common than the other in MCDM. Also, which area these techniques are applied to. Those articles are appearing in journals for the year 2008 only. This paper provides evidence that currently, both AIMCDM and CMCDM are equally common in MCDM
A similarity-based cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for dynamic interval multi-objective optimization problems
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Dynamic interval multi-objective optimization problems (DI-MOPs) are very common in real-world applications. However, there are few evolutionary algorithms that are suitable for tackling DI-MOPs up to date. A framework of dynamic interval multi-objective cooperative co-evolutionary optimization based on the interval similarity is presented in this paper to handle DI-MOPs. In the framework, a strategy for decomposing decision variables is first proposed, through which all the decision variables are divided into two groups according to the interval similarity between each decision variable and interval parameters. Following that, two sub-populations are utilized to cooperatively optimize decision variables in the two groups. Furthermore, two response strategies, rgb0.00,0.00,0.00i.e., a strategy based on the change intensity and a random mutation strategy, are employed to rapidly track the changing Pareto front of the optimization problem. The proposed algorithm is applied to eight benchmark optimization instances rgb0.00,0.00,0.00as well as a multi-period portfolio selection problem and compared with five state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms. The experimental results reveal that the proposed algorithm is very competitive on most optimization instances
Multi-Objective Approaches to Markov Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Parameters
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a popular model for performance analysis
and optimization of stochastic systems. The parameters of stochastic behavior
of MDPs are estimates from empirical observations of a system; their values are
not known precisely. Different types of MDPs with uncertain, imprecise or
bounded transition rates or probabilities and rewards exist in the literature.
Commonly, analysis of models with uncertainties amounts to searching for the
most robust policy which means that the goal is to generate a policy with the
greatest lower bound on performance (or, symmetrically, the lowest upper bound
on costs). However, hedging against an unlikely worst case may lead to losses
in other situations. In general, one is interested in policies that behave well
in all situations which results in a multi-objective view on decision making.
In this paper, we consider policies for the expected discounted reward
measure of MDPs with uncertain parameters. In particular, the approach is
defined for bounded-parameter MDPs (BMDPs) [8]. In this setting the worst, best
and average case performances of a policy are analyzed simultaneously, which
yields a multi-scenario multi-objective optimization problem. The paper
presents and evaluates approaches to compute the pure Pareto optimal policies
in the value vector space.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figures, preprint for VALUETOOLS 201
Recommended from our members
Decision support for build-to-order supply chain management through multiobjective optimization
This paper aims to identify the gaps in decision-making support based on
multiobjective optimization for build-to-order supply chain management (BTOSCM).
To this end, it reviews the literature available on modelling build-to-order
supply chains (BTO-SC) with the focus on adopting multiobjective optimization
(MOO) techniques as a decision support tool. The literature has been classified based
on the nature of the decisions in different part of the supply chain, and the key
decision areas across a typical BTO-SC are discussed in detail. Available software
packages suitable for supporting decision making in BTO supply chains are also
identified and their related solutions are outlined. The gap between the modelling and
optimization techniques developed in the literature and the decision support needed in
practice are highlighted and future research directions to better exploit the decision
support capabilities of MOO are proposed
- …