8,726 research outputs found
Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning
Learning-based pattern classifiers, including deep networks, have shown
impressive performance in several application domains, ranging from computer
vision to cybersecurity. However, it has also been shown that adversarial input
perturbations carefully crafted either at training or at test time can easily
subvert their predictions. The vulnerability of machine learning to such wild
patterns (also referred to as adversarial examples), along with the design of
suitable countermeasures, have been investigated in the research field of
adversarial machine learning. In this work, we provide a thorough overview of
the evolution of this research area over the last ten years and beyond,
starting from pioneering, earlier work on the security of non-deep learning
algorithms up to more recent work aimed to understand the security properties
of deep learning algorithms, in the context of computer vision and
cybersecurity tasks. We report interesting connections between these
apparently-different lines of work, highlighting common misconceptions related
to the security evaluation of machine-learning algorithms. We review the main
threat models and attacks defined to this end, and discuss the main limitations
of current work, along with the corresponding future challenges towards the
design of more secure learning algorithms.Comment: Accepted for publication on Pattern Recognition, 201
Why Do Adversarial Attacks Transfer? Explaining Transferability of Evasion and Poisoning Attacks
Transferability captures the ability of an attack against a machine-learning
model to be effective against a different, potentially unknown, model.
Empirical evidence for transferability has been shown in previous work, but the
underlying reasons why an attack transfers or not are not yet well understood.
In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis aimed to investigate the
transferability of both test-time evasion and training-time poisoning attacks.
We provide a unifying optimization framework for evasion and poisoning attacks,
and a formal definition of transferability of such attacks. We highlight two
main factors contributing to attack transferability: the intrinsic adversarial
vulnerability of the target model, and the complexity of the surrogate model
used to optimize the attack. Based on these insights, we define three metrics
that impact an attack's transferability. Interestingly, our results derived
from theoretical analysis hold for both evasion and poisoning attacks, and are
confirmed experimentally using a wide range of linear and non-linear
classifiers and datasets
Guarantees on learning depth-2 neural networks under a data-poisoning attack
In recent times many state-of-the-art machine learning models have been shown
to be fragile to adversarial attacks. In this work we attempt to build our
theoretical understanding of adversarially robust learning with neural nets. We
demonstrate a specific class of neural networks of finite size and a
non-gradient stochastic algorithm which tries to recover the weights of the net
generating the realizable true labels in the presence of an oracle doing a
bounded amount of malicious additive distortion to the labels. We prove (nearly
optimal) trade-offs among the magnitude of the adversarial attack, the accuracy
and the confidence achieved by the proposed algorithm.Comment: 11 page
- …