Robust Feature Selection by Mutual Information Distributions

Mutual information is widely used in artificial intelligence, in a descriptive way, to measure the stochastic dependence of discrete random variables. In order to address questions such as the reliability of the empirical value, one must consider sample-to-population inferential approaches. This paper deals with the distribution of mutual information, as obtained in a Bayesian framework by a second-order Dirichlet prior distribution. The exact analytical expression for the mean and an analytical approximation of the variance are reported. Asymptotic approximations of the distribution are proposed. The results are applied to the problem of selecting features for incremental learning and classification of the naive Bayes classifier. A fast, newly defined method is shown to outperform the traditional approach based on empirical mutual information on a number of real data sets. Finally, a theoretical development is reported that allows one to efficiently extend the above methods to incomplete samples in an easy and effective way.Comment: 8 two-column page

TCMI: a non-parametric mutual-dependence estimator for multivariate continuous distributions

The identification of relevant features, i.e., the driving variables that determine a process or the property of a system, is an essential part of the analysis of data sets whose entries are described by a large number of variables. The preferred measure for quantifying the relevance of nonlinear statistical dependencies is mutual information, which requires as input probability distributions. Probability distributions cannot be reliably sampled and estimated from limited data, especially for real-valued data samples such as lengths or energies. Here, we introduce total cumulative mutual information (TCMI), a measure of the relevance of mutual dependencies based on cumulative probability distributions. TCMI can be estimated directly from sample data and is a non-parametric, robust and deterministic measure that facilitates comparisons and rankings between feature sets with different cardinality. The ranking induced by TCMI allows for feature selection, i.e., the identification of the set of relevant features that are statistical related to the process or the property of a system, while taking into account the number of data samples as well as the cardinality of the feature subsets. We evaluate the performance of our measure with simulated data, compare its performance with similar multivariate dependence measures, and demonstrate the effectiveness of our feature selection method on a set of standard data sets and a typical scenario in materials science

TCMI: a non-parametric mutual-dependence estimator for multivariate continuous distributions

The identification of relevant features, i.e., the driving variables that determine a process or the property of a system, is an essential part of the analysis of data sets whose entries are described by a large number of variables. The preferred measure for quantifying the relevance of nonlinear statistical dependencies is mutual information, which requires as input probability distributions. Probability distributions cannot be reliably sampled and estimated from limited data, especially for real-valued data samples such as lengths or energies. Here, we introduce total cumulative mutual information (TCMI), a measure of the relevance of mutual dependencies based on cumulative probability distributions. TCMI can be estimated directly from sample data and is a non-parametric, robust and deterministic measure that facilitates comparisons and rankings between feature sets with different cardinality. The ranking induced by TCMI allows for feature selection, i.e., the identification of the set of relevant features that are statistical related to the process or the property of a system, while taking into account the number of data samples as well as the cardinality of the feature subsets. We evaluate the performance of our measure with simulated data, compare its performance with similar multivariate dependence measures, and demonstrate the effectiveness of our feature selection method on a set of standard data sets and a typical scenario in materials science.Comment: 36 pages, 7 figures, 6 table

Genetic association studies for gene expressions: permutation-based mutual information in a comparison with standard ANOVA and as a novel approach for feature selection

Mutual information (MI) is a robust nonparametric statistical approach for identifying associations between genotypes and gene expression levels. Using the data of Problem 1 provided for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 15, we first compared a quantitative MI (Tsalenko et al. 2006 J Bioinform Comput Biol 4:259–4) with the standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test. We then proposed a novel feature selection approach using MI in a classification scenario to address the small n - large p problem and compared it with a feature selection that relies on an asymptotic χ2 distribution. In both applications, we used a permutation-based approach for evaluating the significance of MI. Substantial discrepancies in significance were observed between MI, ANOVA, and KW that can be explained by different empirical distributions of the data. In contrast to ANOVA and KW, MI detects shifts in location when the data are non-normally distributed, skewed, or contaminated with outliers. ANOVA but not MI is often significant if one genotype with a small frequency had a remarkable difference in the average gene expression level relative to the other two genotypes. MI depends on genotype frequencies and cannot detect these differences. In the classification scenario, we show that our novel approach for feature selection identifies a smaller list of markers with higher accuracy compared to the standard method. In conclusion, permutation-based MI approaches provide reliable and flexible statistical frameworks which seem to be well suited for data that are non-normal, skewed, or have an otherwise peculiar distribution. They merit further methodological investigation

Ranking to Learn: Feature Ranking and Selection via Eigenvector Centrality

In an era where accumulating data is easy and storing it inexpensive, feature selection plays a central role in helping to reduce the high-dimensionality of huge amounts of otherwise meaningless data. In this paper, we propose a graph-based method for feature selection that ranks features by identifying the most important ones into arbitrary set of cues. Mapping the problem on an affinity graph-where features are the nodes-the solution is given by assessing the importance of nodes through some indicators of centrality, in particular, the Eigen-vector Centrality (EC). The gist of EC is to estimate the importance of a feature as a function of the importance of its neighbors. Ranking central nodes individuates candidate features, which turn out to be effective from a classification point of view, as proved by a thoroughly experimental section. Our approach has been tested on 7 diverse datasets from recent literature (e.g., biological data and object recognition, among others), and compared against filter, embedded and wrappers methods. The results are remarkable in terms of accuracy, stability and low execution time.Comment: Preprint version - Lecture Notes in Computer Science - Springer 201

Distribution of Mutual Information from Complete and Incomplete Data

Mutual information is widely used, in a descriptive way, to measure the stochastic dependence of categorical random variables. In order to address questions such as the reliability of the descriptive value, one must consider sample-to-population inferential approaches. This paper deals with the posterior distribution of mutual information, as obtained in a Bayesian framework by a second-order Dirichlet prior distribution. The exact analytical expression for the mean, and analytical approximations for the variance, skewness and kurtosis are derived. These approximations have a guaranteed accuracy level of the order O(1/n^3), where n is the sample size. Leading order approximations for the mean and the variance are derived in the case of incomplete samples. The derived analytical expressions allow the distribution of mutual information to be approximated reliably and quickly. In fact, the derived expressions can be computed with the same order of complexity needed for descriptive mutual information. This makes the distribution of mutual information become a concrete alternative to descriptive mutual information in many applications which would benefit from moving to the inductive side. Some of these prospective applications are discussed, and one of them, namely feature selection, is shown to perform significantly better when inductive mutual information is used.Comment: 26 pages, LaTeX, 5 figures, 4 table

Resampling methods for parameter-free and robust feature selection with mutual information

Combining the mutual information criterion with a forward feature selection strategy offers a good trade-off between optimality of the selected feature subset and computation time. However, it requires to set the parameter(s) of the mutual information estimator and to determine when to halt the forward procedure. These two choices are difficult to make because, as the dimensionality of the subset increases, the estimation of the mutual information becomes less and less reliable. This paper proposes to use resampling methods, a K-fold cross-validation and the permutation test, to address both issues. The resampling methods bring information about the variance of the estimator, information which can then be used to automatically set the parameter and to calculate a threshold to stop the forward procedure. The procedure is illustrated on a synthetic dataset as well as on real-world examples