A Single-center Comparison Using Exoskeleton Rehabilitation for Cerebrovascular Accidents and Traumatic Brain Injury in a Cohort of Hispanic Patients

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability in the United States. The EKSO GT Bionics® (EKSO®) is a robotic exoskeleton approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for rehabilitation following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA or stroke) and recently received approval for use in patients with TBI. The aim of the study was to examine if the use of exoskeleton rehabilitation in patients with TBI will produce beneficial outcomes. Methods This retrospective chart-review reports the use of the (EKSO®) robotic device in the rehabilitation of patients with TBI compared to patients with CVA. We utilized data from a single, private rehabilitation hospital for patients that received post-CVA or post-TBI robotic exoskeleton intervention. All patients that used the exoskeleton were discharged from the hospital between 01/01/2017 to 04/30/2020. Ninety-four percent of patients in the CVA groups and 100% of patients in the TBI group were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Gains in total Functional Independence Measure (FIM), walking and cognition, and length of stay in the rehabilitation facility were measured. Results Patients in the TBI group (n = 11) were significantly younger than the patients in the CVA group (n = 66; p \u3c 0.05). Both groups spent a similar amount of time active, number of steps taken, and the number of sessions in the exoskeleton. Both groups also started with similar admission FIM scores. The FIM gain in the TBI group was similar to that of the CVA group (37.5 and 32.0 respectively). The length of stay between groups was not different either. Conclusions The use of exoskeleton rehabilitation in patients with TBI appear to produce similar outcomes as for patients with CVA, prompting further attention of this intervention for this type of injury. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered on 07/09/2020 in clinicaltrials.gov number NCT4465019

The cognitive level does not interfere with recovery after robot-assisted gait training in traumatic brain injury: A 10-year cohort study

BACKGROUND: There is still no clear evidence available on the role of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and on the relationship between this intervention and cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of the cognitive level at admission on functional recovery in a cohort of patients with severe TBI who received RAGT training within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation setting. METHODS: We included patients with gait disturbance due to a severe TBI. Patients were grouped into three classes according to their level of cognitive functioning (LCF) at admission (LCF 2-3; LCF 4-5-6; LCF 7-8). We collected demographics (sex, age), clinical data, and a set of outcome measures at admission and discharge. RESULTS: We registered 80 patients, 19 females and 61 males, 35.3 ± 14.85 years. Patients with a low cognitive level at admission were mostly subacute (p= 0.001). Cognitive impairment despite longer length stay in the hospital (LOS) (p= 0.001) did not preclude recovery after RAGT in terms of cognition (R2= 0.68; p< 0.0001), functional independence (R2= 0.30; p< 0.0001) and overall disability (R2= 0.32; p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Irrespective of their level of cognition, patients with severe TBI might benefit from RAGT during a multidisciplinary program

Lower extremity robotic exoskeleton devices for overground ambulation recovery in acquired brain injury—A review

Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of ambulation deficits in the United States every year. ABI (stroke, traumatic brain injury and cerebral palsy) results in ambulation deficits with residual gait and balance deviations persisting even after 1 year. Current research is focused on evaluating the effect of robotic exoskeleton devices (RD) for overground gait and balance training. In order to understand the device effectiveness on neuroplasticity, it is important to understand RD effectiveness in the context of both downstream (functional, biomechanical and physiological) and upstream (cortical) metrics. The review identifies gaps in research areas and suggests recommendations for future research. We carefully delineate between the preliminary studies and randomized clinical trials in the interpretation of existing evidence. We present a comprehensive review of the clinical and pre-clinical research that evaluated therapeutic effects of RDs using various domains, diagnosis and stage of recovery

Advanced technology for gait rehabilitation: An overview

Most gait training systems are designed for acute and subacute neurological inpatients. Many systems are used for relearning gait movements (nonfunctional training) or gait cycle training (functional gait training). Each system presents its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of functional outcomes. However, training gait cycle movements is not sufficient for the rehabilitation of ambulation. There is a need for new solutions to overcome the limitations of existing systems in order to ensure individually tailored training conditions for each of the potential users, no matter the complexity of his or her condition. There is also a need for a new, integrative approach in gait rehabilitation, one that encompasses and addresses all aspects of physical as well as psychological aspects of ambulation in real-life multitasking situations. In this respect, a multidisciplinary multinational team performed an overview of the current technology for gait rehabilitation and reviewed the principles of ambulation training

Progression of Functional Mobility Recovery after a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report

Background: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) can be devastating events that can completely transform individuals’ lives. Determining prognosis after a brain injury can be difficult to discern due to the countless variations in injuries and contributing factors that affect rehabilitation. There is no standard physical therapy treatment for addressing TBI’s due to the complex integration of the motor cortex with many regions of the brain that impact recovery. Case Description: A 62-year-old male sustained a severe TBI resulting from a fall down the stairs. He was found to have a subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, right posterior cephalohematoma and resulting encephalopathy. He spent 4 weeks in acute care and 39 days in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital to improve his functional mobility. Interventions in inpatient rehab utilized neuromuscular electrical stimulation, the Ekso bionic walking device, and task-oriented functional mobility training to work towards his goal of discharging home with his wife. Outcome Measures: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services GG Codes for Functional Abilities and the Swedish Modified Version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients were utilized to demonstrate the functional improvements made during this patient’s inpatient rehabilitation stay. Discussion: Recovery progression from TBI is difficult to study and predict due to the significant fluctuations in injuries and length of recovery. Neuroplasticity following brain injuries is dependent on timing, the environment, and other concurrent therapies as well as the motivation and attention level of the patient. Multifaceted treatment approaches should be taken to increase likelihood of success. This case demonstrates that despite the low functional initial presentation after a severe TBI, patients can still make dramatic improvements

Robotic Technology in Pediatric Neurorehabilitation. A Pilot Study of Human Factors in an Italian Pediatric Hospital

The introduction of robotic neurorehabilitation among the most recent technologies in pediatrics represents a new opportunity to treat pediatric patients. This study aims at evaluating the response of physiotherapists, patients and their parents to this new technology. The study considered the outcomes of technological innovation in physiotherapists (perception of the workload, satisfaction), as well as that in patients and their parents (quality of life, expectations, satisfaction) by comparing the answers to subjective questionnaires of those who made use of the new technology with those who used the traditional therapy. A total of 12 workers, 46 patients and 47 parents were enrolled in the study. Significant differences were recorded in the total workload score of physiotherapists who use the robotic technology compared with the traditional therapy (p < 0.001). Patients reported a higher quality of life and satisfaction after the use of the robotic neurorehabilitation therapy. The parents of patients undergoing the robotic therapy have moderately higher expectations and satisfaction than those undergoing the traditional therapy. In this pilot study, the robotic neurorehabilitation technique involved a significant increase in the patients' and parents' expectations. As it frequently happens in the introduction of new technologies, physiotherapists perceived a greater workload. Further studies are needed to verify the results achieved

How a Diverse Research Ecosystem Has Generated New Rehabilitation Technologies: Review of NIDILRR’s Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers

Over 50 million United States citizens (1 in 6 people in the US) have a developmental, acquired, or degenerative disability. The average US citizen can expect to live 20% of his or her life with a disability. Rehabilitation technologies play a major role in improving the quality of life for people with a disability, yet widespread and highly challenging needs remain. Within the US, a major effort aimed at the creation and evaluation of rehabilitation technology has been the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) sponsored by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. As envisioned at their conception by a panel of the National Academy of Science in 1970, these centers were intended to take a “total approach to rehabilitation”, combining medicine, engineering, and related science, to improve the quality of life of individuals with a disability. Here, we review the scope, achievements, and ongoing projects of an unbiased sample of 19 currently active or recently terminated RERCs. Specifically, for each center, we briefly explain the needs it targets, summarize key historical advances, identify emerging innovations, and consider future directions. Our assessment from this review is that the RERC program indeed involves a multidisciplinary approach, with 36 professional fields involved, although 70% of research and development staff are in engineering fields, 23% in clinical fields, and only 7% in basic science fields; significantly, 11% of the professional staff have a disability related to their research. We observe that the RERC program has substantially diversified the scope of its work since the 1970’s, addressing more types of disabilities using more technologies, and, in particular, often now focusing on information technologies. RERC work also now often views users as integrated into an interdependent society through technologies that both people with and without disabilities co-use (such as the internet, wireless communication, and architecture). In addition, RERC research has evolved to view users as able at improving outcomes through learning, exercise, and plasticity (rather than being static), which can be optimally timed. We provide examples of rehabilitation technology innovation produced by the RERCs that illustrate this increasingly diversifying scope and evolving perspective. We conclude by discussing growth opportunities and possible future directions of the RERC program

The Effect of Robotic Walking and Activity-based Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity, Secondary Complications & Psychological Well-being in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Activity-based training (ABT) represents the current standard of care in neurological rehabilitation centers around the world. However, innovative rehabilitation techniques have been developed including robotic locomotor training (RLT). The conceptual basis for RLT initially appeared promising; a rehabilitation modality that removes the need for intensive assistance from therapists, whilst facilitating safe and effective over-ground ambulation. However, small sample sizes and a lack of homogeneity across studies have resulted in an underpowered evidence base supporting the efficacy of RLT for SCI rehabilitation. Thus, this randomized control pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of RLT compared to ABT on functional capacity, secondary complications, and psychological well-being in people with SCI after 24-weeks of rehabilitation. Participants with chronic, traumatic motor incomplete SCI were randomized into two intervention groups: RLT (n = 8) and ABT (n = 8) groups. RLT involved solely walking in the Ekso bionic suit. ABT involved a variety of resistance, cardiovascular and flexibility training combined with regular weight-bearing in the standing position. Outcome measures, including functional strength, ambulatory function, pain, spasticity, bladder/bowel, bone density, body composition, quality of life (QoL) and depression were tested at baseline, 6, 12 and 24-weeks of the intervention. There were no significant differences between the intervention groups for lower or upper extremity motor scores (UEMS effect size (ES) = 0.30; LEMS ES = 0.07), back strength (ES = 0.14) and abdominal strength (ES = 0.13) after training. However, both groups showed a significant increase of 2.00 points in UEMS and a significant increase in abdominal strength from pre- to post intervention. Only the RLT group showed a significant change in LEMS, with a mean increase of 3.00 [0.00; 16.5] points over time. Distance walked in the Functional Ambulatory Inventory (SCI-FAI) increased significantly (p = 0.02) over time only for the RLT group. Therefore, the RLT showed promising evidence for potentially inducing functional strength changes and improvements in ambulatory function after 24 weeks of training. There was some evidence to support RLT to induce bowel improvements in individuals with SCI and both interventions appeared to reduce urinary incontinence and improve bladder function (p = 0.04). Total spasticity and pain intensity were similar between groups (p = 0.25; p = 0.96). However, pain interference ratings significantly increased from pre-post intervention for both groups (p = 0.05). RLT prevented the progressive decline of bone mineral density usually occurring in the SCI population, as hip BMD was maintained during RLT; however, it was significantly reduced (p = 0.04) during ABT, with a mean reduction of 0.06 [-0.34, 0.22] g/cm2 (5%) from pre to post intervention. No change in leg fat-free soft tissue mass (FFSTM) occurred between groups or over time (p = 0.32), however, there was a significant 7% increase in arm FFSTM over time for both groups (p < 0.01). The ABT group was more effective (ES = 1.02) in reducing central and peripheral adiposity, with a significant decrease in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) (p = 0.04) and gynoid FM (p = 0.01) over time. Both groups reported increased QoL and decreased depression ratings over time, with the RLT group having a significant change in the general life and physical health domains, p = 0.03, respectively. This pilot trial offers promising evidence for the effectiveness of RLT for improving functional and ambulatory capacity, reducing secondary complications, and potentially improving QoL in people with incomplete SCI. Thus, this dissertation adds substantial weight to the lacking evidence base on the effects of RLT, by incorporating a large homogenous sample, comprehensive testing procedures and an extended intervention period within South Africa

Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta‑synthesis.

Background: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices. Methods: Qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review. Results: The search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options. Conclusions: Despite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery