On the first-order rewritability of conjunctive queries over binary guarded existential rules

We study conjunctive query answering and first-order rewritability of conjunctive queries for binary guarded existential rules. In particular, we prove that the problem of establishing whether a given set of binary guarded existential rules is such that all conjunctive queries admit a first-order rewriting is decidable, and present a technique for solving this problem. These results have a important practical impact, since they make it possible to identify those sets of binary guarded existential rules for which it is possible to answer every conjunctive query through query rewriting and standard evaluation of a first-order query (actually, a union of conjunctive queries) over a relational database system

Evaluating Datalog via Tree Automata and Cycluits

We investigate parameterizations of both database instances and queries that make query evaluation fixed-parameter tractable in combined complexity. We show that clique-frontier-guarded Datalog with stratified negation (CFG-Datalog) enjoys bilinear-time evaluation on structures of bounded treewidth for programs of bounded rule size. Such programs capture in particular conjunctive queries with simplicial decompositions of bounded width, guarded negation fragment queries of bounded CQ-rank, or two-way regular path queries. Our result is shown by translating to alternating two-way automata, whose semantics is defined via cyclic provenance circuits (cycluits) that can be tractably evaluated.Comment: 56 pages, 63 references. Journal version of "Combined Tractability of Query Evaluation via Tree Automata and Cycluits (Extended Version)" at arXiv:1612.04203. Up to the stylesheet, page/environment numbering, and possible minor publisher-induced changes, this is the exact content of the journal paper that will appear in Theory of Computing Systems. Update wrt version 1: latest reviewer feedbac

Bounded Implication for Existential Rules

The property of boundedness in Datalog formalizes whether a set of rules can be equivalently expressed by a non-recursive set of rules. Existential rules extend Datalog to the presence of existential variables in rule heads. In this paper, we introduce and study notions of boundedness for existential rules. We provide a notion of weak boundedness and a notion of strong boundedness for a rule set, and show that they correspond, respectively, to the notions of first-order rewritability of atomic queries and first-order rewritability of conjunctive queries over the set. While weak and strong boundedness are in general not equivalent, we show that, for some notable subclasses of existential rules, i.e., Datalog, single-head binary rules, and frontier-guarded rules, the two notions coincide

Query Containment for Highly Expressive Datalog Fragments

The containment problem of Datalog queries is well known to be undecidable. There are, however, several Datalog fragments for which containment is known to be decidable, most notably monadic Datalog and several "regular" query languages on graphs. Monadically Defined Queries (MQs) have been introduced recently as a joint generalization of these query languages. In this paper, we study a wide range of Datalog fragments with decidable query containment and determine exact complexity results for this problem. We generalize MQs to (Frontier-)Guarded Queries (GQs), and show that the containment problem is 3ExpTime-complete in either case, even if we allow arbitrary Datalog in the sub-query. If we focus on graph query languages, i.e., fragments of linear Datalog, then this complexity is reduced to 2ExpSpace. We also consider nested queries, which gain further expressivity by using predicates that are defined by inner queries. We show that nesting leads to an exponentially increasing hierarchy for the complexity of query containment, both in the linear and in the general case. Our results settle open problems for (nested) MQs, and they paint a comprehensive picture of the state of the art in Datalog query containment.Comment: 20 page

Datalog rewriting for Guarded TGDs

We deal with the problem of fact entailment with respect to a database and a set of integrity constraints, focusing on the case of Guarded tuple-generating dependencies (GTGDs). The original approach to the problem in the literature is via forward reasoning or "chasing", where one completes the input database by adding fresh elements and facts. This completion process may be infinite, but in the case of GTGDs it is known that one can compute a point where the chase can be cut off without missing any base facts. Another approach is by forming an automaton and checking it for emptiness. Neither of these approaches scales to large input datasets. An alternative approach is to rewrite the constraints into Datalog: the Datalog rewriting can be generated in advance of any dataset and will produce the same base facts as the original constraints. It is known that Datalog rewritings always exist. But to our knowledge the approach has never been implemented. In this work we overview effective algorithms to Datalog rewriting of GTGDs. This presents work that will appear in VLDB 2022

Verifying Recursive Active Documents with Positive Data Tree Rewriting

This paper proposes a data tree-rewriting framework for modeling evolving documents. The framework is close to Guarded Active XML, a platform used for handling XML repositories evolving through web services. We focus on automatic verification of properties of evolving documents that can contain data from an infinite domain. We establish the boundaries of decidability, and show that verification of a {\em positive} fragment that can handle recursive service calls is decidable. We also consider bounded model-checking in our data tree-rewriting framework and show that it is \nexptime-complete