Within-trial effects of stimulus-reward associations

While a globally energizing influence of motivation has long been appreciated in psychological research, a series of more recent studies has described motivational influences on specific cognitive operations ranging from visual attention, to cognitive control, to memory formation. In the majority of these studies, a cue predicts the potential to win money in a subsequent task, thus allowing for modulations of proactive task preparation. Here we describe some recent studies using tasks that communicate reward availability without such cues by directly associating specific task features with reward. Despite abolishing the cue-based preparation phase, these studies show similar performance benefits. Given the clear difference in temporal structure, a central question is how these behavioral effects are brought about, and in particular whether control processes can rapidly be enhanced reactively. We present some evidence in favor of this notion. Although additional influences, for example sensory prioritization of reward-related features, could contribute to the reward-related performance benefits, those benefits seem to strongly rely on enhancements of control processes during task execution. Still, for a better mechanistic understanding of reward benefits in these two principal paradigms (cues vs. no cues), more work is needed that directly compares the underlying processes. We anticipate that reward benefits can be brought about in a very flexible fashion depending on the exact nature of the reward manipulation and task, and that a better understanding of these processes will not only be relevant for basic motivation research, but that it can also be valuable for educational and psychopathological contexts

Inside the brain of an elite athlete: The neural processes that support high achievement in sports

Events like the World Championships in athletics and the Olympic Games raise the public profile of competitive sports. They may also leave us wondering what sets the competitors in these events apart from those of us who simply watch. Here we attempt to link neural and cognitive processes that have been found to be important for elite performance with computational and physiological theories inspired by much simpler laboratory tasks. In this way we hope to inspire neuroscientists to consider how their basic research might help to explain sporting skill at the highest levels of performance

The emotional gatekeeper: a computational model of attentional selection and suppression through the pathway from the amygdala to the inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus

In a complex environment that contains both opportunities and threats, it is important for an organism to flexibly direct attention based on current events and prior plans. The amygdala, the hub of the brain's emotional system, is involved in forming and signaling affective associations between stimuli and their consequences. The inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) is a hub of the attentional system that gates thalamo-cortical signaling. In the primate brain, a recently discovered pathway from the amygdala sends robust projections to TRN. Here we used computational modeling to demonstrate how the amygdala-TRN pathway, embedded in a wider neural circuit, can mediate selective attention guided by emotions. Our Emotional Gatekeeper model demonstrates how this circuit enables focused top-down, and flexible bottom-up, allocation of attention. The model suggests that the amygdala-TRN projection can serve as a unique mechanism for emotion-guided selection of signals sent to cortex for further processing. This inhibitory selection mechanism can mediate a powerful affective 'framing' effect that may lead to biased decision-making in highly charged emotional situations. The model also supports the idea that the amygdala can serve as a relevance detection system. Further, the model demonstrates how abnormal top-down drive and dysregulated local inhibition in the amygdala and in the cortex can contribute to the attentional symptoms that accompany several neuropsychiatric disorders.R01MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 MH101209 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01NS024760 - NINDS NIH HHS; R01MH101209 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 NS024760 - NINDS NIH HH

The hierarchical organisation of cortical and basal-ganglia systems: a computationally-informed review and integrated hypothesis

To suitably adapt to the challenges posed by reproduction and survival, animals need to learn to select when to perform different behaviours, to have internal criteria for guiding these learning processes, and to perform behaviours efficiently once selected. To implement these processes, their brain must be organised in a suitable hierarchical fashion. Here we briefly review two types of neural/behavioural/computational literatures, focussed respectively on cortex and on sub-cortical areas, and highlight their important limitations. Then we review two computational modelling works of the authors that exemplify the problems, brain areas, experiments, main concepts and limitations of the two research threads. Finally we propose a theoretical integration of the two views, showing how this allows to solve most of the problems found by the two accounts if taken in isolation. The overall picture that emerges is that the cortical and the basal ganglia systems form two highly-organised hierarchical systems working in close synergy and jointly solving all the challenges of choice, selection, and implementation needed to acquire and express adaptive behaviour

Dynamic interplay between reward and voluntary attention determines stimulus processing in visual cortex

Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Ghent University [grant 617 #01D02415 awarded to IG; grant # BOF14/PDO/123 awarded to AS], the Concerted Research Action Grant of Ghent University [grant number BOF16/GOA/017 awarded to EHWK], and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P002404/1 awarded to SKA]. The funding sources were not involved in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the article for publication. We would like to thank Prof. Gilles Pourtois for his help with conceiving the study and for the very useful discussions of the results. Further, we thank Gilles for all of the materials he provided for this study. We would also like to thank Dr. Ladislas Nalborczyk for discussions about statistical analyses of the data, Prof. Ruth Krebs for her comments on a previous version of the manuscript, and Dr. Inez Greven for help with data collectionPeer reviewedPostprin

The impact of reward value on early sensory processing and its interaction with selective attention

Reward value affects the earliest stages of sensory perception. Whereas a host of previous studies have investigated the underlying mechanisms of reward-driven modulation of visual perception, reward effects in other sensory modalities have remained underexplored. Specifically, it has remained unknown how reward signals should be coordinated and communicated across sensory modalities. The current PhD thesis aimed to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms of reward-driven modulation of perception and its interaction with attention across sensory modalities. To this end, three experiments were conducted to identify the behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of reward effects. In Study 1, we found that high reward, task-irrelevant visual cues (intra-modal) elicited an early suppression of visual event-related potentials (ERPs). High reward auditory cues (cross-modal), on the other hand, led to a later modulation of visual ERPs and facilitated behavioral performance. Study 2 tested the dependence of reward effects on the spatial and temporal arrangement of intra-modal and cross-modal cues relative to the target, and showed that each reward cue maximally exerts its effect under a specific size of attentional focus. Study 3 explicitly manipulated the spatial attention and tested how reward associations of an audiovisual stimulus influence the allocation of attention. We found that auditory rewards enhanced the attentional modulation of both visual and auditory ERPs. Interestingly, although visual rewards did not lead to a distinguishable ERP modulation, they led to strong modulations when they were combined with auditory rewards, suggesting that integration across modalities boosts the reward effects. Taken together, the current PhD thesis identified the behavioral and neural signatures of reward-driven modulation of perception under different modes of reward signaling and different degrees of attentional engagement. Our findings inspire a two-stage model of reward processing, with local, intra-modal reward effects occurring at an early stage and long-range, multimodal reward effects arising at a later stage. Cross-modal reward signals have important ramifications for clinical applications where the impaired function of one sense can be rehabilitated by motivational signals conveyed through another sensory modality.2021-11-2