A CDCL-style calculus for solving non-linear constraints

In this paper we propose a novel approach for checking satisfiability of non-linear constraints over the reals, called ksmt. The procedure is based on conflict resolution in CDCL style calculus, using a composition of symbolical and numerical methods. To deal with the non-linear components in case of conflicts we use numerically constructed restricted linearisations. This approach covers a large number of computable non-linear real functions such as polynomials, rational or trigonometrical functions and beyond. A prototypical implementation has been evaluated on several non-linear SMT-LIB examples and the results have been compared with state-of-the-art SMT solvers.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figures; accepted at FroCoS 2019; software available at <http://informatik.uni-trier.de/~brausse/ksmt/

IPASIR-UP: User Propagators for CDCL

Modern SAT solvers are frequently embedded as sub-reasoning engines into more complex tools for addressing problems beyond the Boolean satisfiability problem. Examples include solvers for Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), combinatorial optimization, model enumeration and counting. In such use cases, the SAT solver is often able to provide relevant information beyond the satisfiability answer. Further, domain knowledge of the embedding system (e.g., symmetry properties or theory axioms) can be beneficial for the CDCL search, but cannot be efficiently represented in clausal form. In this paper, we propose a general interface to inspect and influence the internal behaviour of CDCL SAT solvers. Our goal is to capture the most essential functionalities that are sufficient to simplify and improve use cases that require a more fine-grained interaction with the SAT solver than provided via the standard IPASIR interface. For our experiments, we extend CaDiCaL with our interface and evaluate it on two representative use cases: enumerating graphs within the SAT modulo Symmetries framework (SMS), and as the main CDCL(T) SAT engine of the SMT solver cvc5

Efficient satisfiability solver

The past few decades saw great improvements in the performance of satisfiability (SAT) solvers. In this thesis, we discuss the state-of-the-art techniques used in building an efficient SAT solver. Modern SAT solvers are mainly constituted by the following components: decision heuristics, Boolean constraint propagation, conflict analysis, restart, clause deletion and preprocessing. Various algorithms and implementations in each component will be discussed and analyzed. Then we propose a new backtracking strategy, partial backtracking, which can be easily implemented in SAT solvers. It is essentially an extension of the backtracking strategy used in most SAT solvers. With partial backtracking, the solver consecutively amends the variable assignments instead of discarding them completely so that it does not backtrack as many levels as the classic strategy does after analyzing a conflict. We implemented this strategy in our solver Nigma and the experiments show that the solver benefits from this adjustment

Proceedings of SAT Competition 2021 : Solver and Benchmark Descriptions

Non peer reviewe

Limits of CDCL Learning via Merge Resolution

In their seminal work, Atserias et al. and independently Pipatsrisawat and Darwiche in 2009 showed that CDCL solvers can simulate resolution proofs with polynomial overhead. However, previous work does not address the tightness of the simulation, i.e., the question of how large this overhead needs to be. In this paper, we address this question by focusing on an important property of proofs generated by CDCL solvers that employ standard learning schemes, namely that the derivation of a learned clause has at least one inference where a literal appears in both premises (aka, a merge literal). Specifically, we show that proofs of this kind can simulate resolution proofs with at most a linear overhead, but there also exist formulas where such overhead is necessary or, more precisely, that there exist formulas with resolution proofs of linear length that require quadratic CDCL proofs

Evaluating CDCL Variable Scoring Schemes

Abstract. The VSIDS (variable state independent decaying sum) decision heuristic invented in the context of the CDCL (conflict-driven clause learning) SAT solver Chaff, is considered crucial for achieving high efficiency of modern SAT solvers on application benchmarks. This paper proposes ACIDS (average conflict-index decision score), a variant of VSIDS. The ACIDS heuristics is compared to the original implementation of VSIDS, its popular modern implementation EVSIDS (exponential VSIDS), the VMTF (variable move-to-front) scheme, and other related decision heuristics. They all share the important principle to select those variables as decisions, which recently participated in conflicts. The main goal of the paper is to provide an empirical evaluation to serve as a starting point for trying to understand the reason for the efficiency of these decision heuristics. In our experiments, it turns out that EVSIDS, VMTF, ACIDS behave very similarly, if implemented carefully

Limits of CDCL Learning via Merge Resolution

In their seminal work, Atserias et al. and independently Pipatsrisawat and Darwiche in 2009 showed that CDCL solvers can simulate resolution proofs with polynomial overhead. However, previous work does not address the tightness of the simulation, i.e., the question of how large this overhead needs to be. In this paper, we address this question by focusing on an important property of proofs generated by CDCL solvers that employ standard learning schemes, namely that the derivation of a learned clause has at least one inference where a literal appears in both premises (aka, a merge literal). Specifically, we show that proofs of this kind can simulate resolution proofs with at most a linear overhead, but there also exist formulas where such overhead is necessary or, more precisely, that there exist formulas with resolution proofs of linear length that require quadratic CDCL proofs

Proceedings of SAT Race 2019 : Solver and Benchmark Descriptions

Non peer reviewe

Design, implementation and evaluation of a distributed CDCL framework

The primary subject of this dissertation is practically solving instances of the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) that arise from industrial applications. The invention of the conflict-driven clause-learning (CDCL) algorithm led to enormous progress in this field. CDCL has been augmented with effective pre- and inprocessing techniques that boost its effectiveness. While a considerable amount of work has been done on applying shared-memory parallelism to enhance the performance of CDCL, solving SAT on distributed architectures is studied less thoroughly. In this work, we develop a distributed, CDCL-based framework for SAT solving. This framework consists of three main components: 1. An implementation of the CDCL algorithm that we have written from scratch, 2. a novel, parallel SAT algorithm that builds upon this CDCL implementation and 3. a collection of parallel simplification techniques for SAT instances. We call our resulting framework satUZK; our parallel solving algorithm is called the distributed divide-and-conquer (DDC) algorithm. The DDC algorithm employs a parallel lookahead procedure to dynamically partition the search space. Load balancing is used to ensure that all computational resources are utilized during lookahead. This procedure results in a divide-and-conquer tree that is distributed over all processors. Individual threads are routed through this tree until they arrive at unsolved leaf vertices. Upon arrival, the lookahead procedure is invoked again or the leaf vertex is solved via CDCL. Several extensions to the DDC algorithm are proposed. These include clause sharing and a scheme to locally adjust the LBD score relative to the current search tree vertex. LBD is a measure for the usefulness of clauses that participate in a CDCL search. We evaluate our DDC algorithm empirically and benchmark it against the best distributed SAT algorithms. In this experiment, our DDC algorithm is faster than other distributed, state-of-the-art solvers and solves at least as many instances. In addition to running a parallel algorithm for SAT solving we also consider parallel simplifcation. Here, we first develop a theoretical foundation that allows us to prove the correctness of parallel simplification techniques. Using this as a basis, we examine established simplification algorithms for their parallelizability. It turns out that several well-known simplification techniques can be parallelized efficiently. We provide parallel implementation of the techniques and test their effectiveness in empirical experiments. This evaluation finds several combinations of simplification techniques that can solve instances which could not be solved by the DDC algorithm alone