A Multi-Step Analysis of the Evolution of English Do-Support

This dissertation advances our understanding of the historical evolution and grammatical structure of English do-support through the application of novel historical data to this classical problem in historical syntax. Do-support is the phenomenon in English whereby a pleonastic auxiliary verb do is inserted in certain clause types. The phenomenon is characteristic of the modern language, and there is robust evidence that it emerged beginning in roughly the year 1500. The fine quantitative details of this emergence and the variation it engendered have been an object of study since Ellegård (1953). From the standpoint of generative grammar, Roberts (1985), Kroch (1989), and many others have treated the emergence of do-support as a closely-following consequence of the loss of V-to-T raising in the 15th and 16th centuries. Taking a cross-linguistic perspective, I show that though the totality of English do-support is uncommon in other languages, the phenomenon may be seen as the combination of several discrete building blocks, each of which is robustly attested. From this perspective, a question is raised about the genesis of English do-support: given that the present-day phenomenon is evidently composed of several separate subcases, why should its cause be attributed solely to the loss of V-to-T raising? I argue that the earliest emergence of do-support in English is in fact attributable to a different source: a usage of do as a marker of external arguments. This explanation addresses the following points, which under earlier accounts were unexplained: * The different behavior of do-support across argument structure types. * The appearance of do-support in affirmative declaratives at a peak rate of 10%, much more than can be attributed to emphatic assertions. * The emergence of do-support from a Middle English causative. This intermediate do spread through the language until roughly 1575, when the loss of verb raising triggered an abrupt reanalysis which transformed the argument-structure marking do into its modern form

Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm

The volume discusses the breadth of applications for an extended notion of paradigm. Paradigms in this sense are not only tools of morphological description but constitute the inherent structure of grammar. Grammatical paradigms are structural sets forming holistic, semiotic structures with an informational value of their own. We argue that as such, paradigms are a part of speaker knowledge and provide necessary structuring for grammaticalization processes. The papers discuss theoretical as well as conceptual questions and explore different domains of grammatical phenomena, ranging from grammaticalization, morphology, and cognitive semantics to modality, aiming to illustrate what the concept of grammatical paradigms can and cannot (yet) explain

A corpus-based error analysis of Korean learner English: from a cognitive linguistic perspective to the L2 mental lexicon

This thesis investigates lexical errors in a learner corpus that consists of essays written by Korean learners of English. Taking a cognitive linguistic perspective, it first presents the L2 lexical development model as a conceptual framework. Then, based on this framework, it proposes a new error taxonomy in which errors from the four lexical domains in the L2 mental lexicon can be categorised as either interlingual or intralingual errors. In order to identify whether the taxonomy is well-grounded, this thesis selects four error features, one from each of the four lexical domains: collocational errors of dimensional adjectives in the semantic domain; over-passivisation errors of non-alternating unaccusative verbs in the syntactic domain; derivational morphological errors in the morphological domain; spelling errors in the phonological/orthographic domain. The results, obtained through corpus-based error analysis, suggest that there is evidence of both interlingual and intralingual influences on the four error features from the four lexical domains. Based on the findings, this study provides pedagogical implications for English classrooms in Korea and recommends that the findings should be used to improve teaching materials and to raise awareness of the influences on the lexical errors

Social and structural aspects of language contact and change

This book brings together papers that discuss social and structural aspects of language contact and language change. Several papers look at the relevance of historical documents to determine the linguistic nature of early contact varieties, while others investigate the specific processes of contact-induced change that were involved in the emergence and development of these languages. A third set of papers look at how new datasets and greater sensitivity to social issues can help to (re)assess persistent theoretical and empirical questions as well as help to open up new avenues of research. In particular they highlight the heterogeneity of contemporary language practices and attitudes often obscured in sociolinguistic research. The contributions all focus on language variation and change but investigate it from a variety of disciplinary and empirical perspectives and cover a range of linguistic contexts

On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, Relations, Analyses

On Looking into Words is a wide-ranging volume spanning current research into word structure and morphology, with a focus on historical linguistics and linguistic theory. The papers are offered as a tribute to Stephen R. Anderson, the Dorothy R. Diebold Professor of Linguistics at Yale, who is retiring at the end of the 2016-2017 academic year. The contributors are friends, colleagues, and former students of Professor Anderson, all important contributors to linguistics in their own right. As is typical for such volumes, the contributions span a variety of topics relating to the interests of the honorand. In this case, the central contributions that Anderson has made to so many areas of linguistics and cognitive science, drawing on synchronic and diachronic phenomena in diverse linguistic systems, are represented through the papers in the volume. The 26 papers that constitute this volume are unified by their discussion of the interplay between synchrony and diachrony, theory and empirical results, and the role of diachronic evidence in understanding the nature of language. Central concerns of the volume include morphological gaps, learnability, increases and declines in productivity, and the interaction of different components of the grammar. The papers deal with a range of linked synchronic and diachronic topics in phonology, morphology, and syntax (in particular, cliticization), and their implications for linguistic theory