Restricted ambiguity of erasing morphisms

A morphism h is called ambiguous for a string s if there is another morphism that maps s to the same image as h; otherwise, it is called unambiguous. In this paper, we examine some fundamental problems on the ambiguity of erasing morphisms. We provide a detailed analysis of so-called ambiguity partitions, and our main result uses this concept to characterise those strings that have a morphism of strongly restricted ambiguity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that there are strings for which the set of unambiguous morphisms, depending on the size of the target alphabet of these morphisms, is empty, finite or infinite. Finally, we show that the problem of the existence of unambiguous erasing morphisms is equivalent to some basic decision problems for nonerasing multi-pattern languages

Unambiguous 1-Uniform Morphisms

A morphism h is unambiguous with respect to a word w if there is no other morphism g that maps w to the same image as h. In the present paper we study the question of whether, for any given word, there exists an unambiguous 1-uniform morphism, i.e., a morphism that maps every letter in the word to an image of length 1.Comment: In Proceedings WORDS 2011, arXiv:1108.341

Weakly Unambiguous Morphisms

A nonerasing morphism sigma is said to be weakly unambiguous with respect to a word w if sigma is the only nonerasing morphism that can map w to sigma(w), i.e., there does not exist any other nonerasing morphism tau satisfying tau(w) = sigma(w). In the present paper, we wish to characterise those words with respect to which there exists such a morphism. This question is nontrivial if we consider so-called length-increasing morphisms, which map a word to an image that is strictly longer than the word. Our main result is a compact characterisation that holds for all morphisms with ternary or larger target alphabets. We also comprehensively describe those words that have a weakly unambiguous length-increasing morphism with a unary target alphabet, but we have to leave the problem open for binary alphabets, where we can merely give some non-characteristic conditions

Weakly unambiguous morphisms

Weakly unambiguous morphism

On restricting the ambiguity in morphic images of words

For alphabets Delta_1, Delta_2, a morphism g : Delta_1* to Delta_2* is ambiguous with respect to a word u in Delta_1* if there exists a second morphism h : Delta_1* to Delta_2* such that g(u) = h(u) and g not= h. Otherwise g is unambiguous. Hence unambiguous morphisms are those whose structure is fully preserved in their morphic images. A concept so far considered in the free monoid, the first part of this thesis considers natural extensions of ambiguity of morphisms to free groups. It is shown that, while the most straightforward generalization of ambiguity to a free monoid results in a trivial situation, that all morphisms are (always) ambiguous, there exist meaningful extensions of (un)ambiguity which are non-trivial - most notably the concepts of (un)ambiguity up to inner automorphism and up to automorphism. A characterization is given of words in a free group for which there exists an injective morphism which is unambiguous up to inner automorphism in terms of fixed points of morphisms, replicating an existing result for words in the free monoid. A conjecture is presented, which if correct, is sufficient to show an equivalent characterization for unambiguity up to automorphism. A rather counterintuitive statement is also established, that for some words, the only unambiguous (up to automorphism) morphisms are non-injective (or even periodic). The second part of the thesis addresses words for which all non-periodic morphisms are unambiguous. In the free monoid, these take the form of periodicity forcing words. It is shown using morphisms that there exist ratio-primitive periodicity forcing words over arbitrary alphabets, and furthermore that it is possible to establish large and varied classes in this way. It is observed that the set of periodicity forcing words is spanned by chains of words, where each word is a morphic image of its predecessor. It is shown that the chains terminate in exactly one direction, meaning not all periodicity forcing words may be reached as the (non-trivial) morphic image of another. Such words are called prime periodicity forcing words, and some alternative methods for finding them are given. The free-group equivalent to periodicity forcing words - a special class of C-test words - is also considered, as well as the ambiguity of terminal-preserving morphisms with respect to words containing terminal symbols, or constants. Moreover, some applications to pattern languages and group pattern languages are discussed

Unambiguous 1-uniform morphisms

A morphism σ is unambiguous with respect to a word α if there is no other morphism τ that maps α to the same image as σ. In the present paper we study the question of whether, for any given word, there exists an unambiguous 1-uniform morphism, i.e., a morphism that maps every letter in the word to an image of length 1

Morphic primitivity and alphabet reductions

An alphabet reduction is a 1-uniform morphism that maps a word to an image that contains a smaller number of dfferent letters. In the present paper we investigate the effect of alphabet reductions on morphically primitive words, i. e., words that are not a fixed point of a nontrivial morphism. Our first main result answers a question on the existence of unambiguous alphabet reductions for such words, and our second main result establishes whether alphabet reductions can be given that preserve morphic primitivity. In addition to this, we study Billaud's Conjecture - which features a dfferent type of alphabet reduction, but is otherwise closely related to the main subject of our paper - and prove its correctness for a special case

Weakly unambiguous morphisms

A nonerasing morphism σ is said to be weakly unambiguous with respect to a word s if σ is the only nonerasing morphism that can map s to σ(s), i. e., there does not exist any other nonerasing morphism τ satisfying τ(s) = σ(s). In the present paper, we wish to characterise those words with respect to which there exists such a morphism. This question is nontrivial if we consider so-called length-increasing morphisms, which map a word to an image that is strictly longer than the word. Our main result is a compact characterisation that holds for all morphisms with ternary or larger target alphabets. We also comprehensively describe those words that have a weakly unambiguous length-increasing morphism with a unary target alphabet, but we have to leave the problem open for binary alphabets, where we can merely give some non-characteristic conditions

Conditions on the existence of unambiguous morphisms

A morphism α is (strongly) unambiguous with respect to a word α if there is no other morphism τ that maps α to the same image as σ. Moreover, α is said to be weakly unambiguous with respect to a word α if σ is the only nonerasing morphism.....

On the equivalence problem for E-pattern languages over small alphabets

We contribute new facets to the discussion on the equivalence problem for E-pattern languages (also referred to as extended or erasing pattern languages). This fundamental open question asks for the existence of a computable function that, given any pair of patterns, decides whether or not they generate the same language. Our main result disproves Ohlebusch and Ukkonen’s conjecture (Theoretical Computer Science 186, 1997) on the equivalence problem; the respective argumentation, that largely deals with the nondeterminism of pattern languages, is restricted to terminal alphabets with at most four distinct letters