Volume 35, 1998 Speaker and Gavel

Complete digitized volume (volume 35, 1998) of Speaker & Gavel

The George-Anne

Council Elections Held Tomorrow Opposition Organizes Local Symphony Season Opens What Does ERA Really Mean? Students Seek Pleasure, Prof Says Symphony To Perform Newman Reclaims Trailer Homecoming \u2776 Has Bicentennial Theme Christmas Spawns Theft Acrylic Paintings Shown Nijem Brothers Take Top Honors University System Enrollment Increases The Bull Goose Loony Higher Education: Pursuit & Sacrifice? The $pirit Of Christmas Sarge And The Legacy The Triumph Of Obscurantism Insurance-Are You Worth The Risk? OHYES, ITISHIMAGAIN Savannah\u27s Revitalization On A River Learning For Learning\u27s Sake Shrimp Rock & City Jive At Hanner Sports Eagle Bulleti

Central Florida Future, Vol. 36 No. 31, January 5, 2004

O\u27Leary Knighted as coach; Coach\u27s hiring has teachers seething; Ready to serve; SAE fraternity suspended for one year after hazing incident.https://stars.library.ucf.edu/centralfloridafuture/2723/thumbnail.jp

The Trail, 2009-04-10

https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/thetrail_all/2948/thumbnail.jp

Easterner, Vol. 19, No. 6, November 6, 1968

This issue includes articles about a student / faculty leadership retreat, protests about the 1968 election, a lecture by Washington Mexican-American Federation member Charles Jiminez on Chicano education, the abolishment of the classroom bell, Parent Weekend activities, and the last second defeat to Western Washington State College.https://dc.ewu.edu/student_newspapers/1513/thumbnail.jp

How Planners Deal with Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Dubious Ethics of the American Planning Association

With a point of departure in the concept "uncomfortable knowledge," this article presents a case study of how the American Planning Association (APA) deals with such knowledge. APA was found to actively suppress publicity of malpractice concerns and bad planning in order to sustain a boosterish image of planning. In the process, APA appeared to disregard and violate APA's own Code of Ethics. APA justified its actions with a need to protect APA members' interests, seen as preventing planning and planners from being presented in public in a bad light. The current article argues that it is in members' interest to have malpractice critiqued and reduced, and that this best happens by exposing malpractice, not by denying or diverting attention from it as APA did in this case. Professions, organizations, and societies that stifle critique tend to degenerate and become socially and politically irrelevant "zombie institutions." The article asks whether such degeneration has set in for APA and planning. Finally, it is concluded that more debate about APA's ethics and actions is needed for improving planning practice. Nine key questions are presented to constructively stimulate such debate.Comment: Flyvbjerg, Bent, 2013, "How Planners Deal with Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Dubious Ethics of the American Planning Association," Citie