938 research outputs found
Space complexity in polynomial calculus
During the last decade, an active line of research in proof complexity has been to study space
complexity and time-space trade-offs for proofs. Besides being a natural complexity measure of
intrinsic interest, space is also an important issue in SAT solving, and so research has mostly focused
on weak systems that are used by SAT solvers.
There has been a relatively long sequence of papers on space in resolution, which is now reasonably
well understood from this point of view. For other natural candidates to study, however, such as
polynomial calculus or cutting planes, very little has been known. We are not aware of any nontrivial
space lower bounds for cutting planes, and for polynomial calculus the only lower bound has been
for CNF formulas of unbounded width in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02], where the space lower bound is
smaller than the initial width of the clauses in the formulas. Thus, in particular, it has been consistent
with current knowledge that polynomial calculus could be able to refute any k-CNF formula in
constant space.
In this paper, we prove several new results on space in polynomial calculus (PC), and in the
extended proof system polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) studied in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02]:
1. We prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PC for the canonical 3-CNF version of the pigeonhole
principle formulas PHPm
n with m pigeons and n holes, and show that this is tight.
2. For PCR, we prove an Ω(n) space lower bound for a bitwise encoding of the functional pigeonhole
principle. These formulas have width O(log n), and hence this is an exponential
improvement over [Alekhnovich et al. ’02] measured in the width of the formulas.
3. We then present another encoding of the pigeonhole principle that has constant width, and
prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PCR for these formulas as well.
4. Finally, we prove that any k-CNF formula can be refuted in PC in simultaneous exponential
size and linear space (which holds for resolution and thus for PCR, but was not obviously
the case for PC). We also characterize a natural class of CNF formulas for which the space
complexity in resolution and PCR does not change when the formula is transformed into 3-CNF
in the canonical way, something that we believe can be useful when proving PCR space lower
bounds for other well-studied formula families in proof complexity
Resolution and the binary encoding of combinatorial principles.
Res(s) is an extension of Resolution working on s-DNFs. We prove tight n (k) lower bounds for the size
of refutations of the binary version of the k-Clique Principle in Res(o(log log n)). Our result improves that of
Lauria, Pudlák et al. [27] who proved the lower bound for Res(1), i.e. Resolution. The exact complexity of
the (unary) k-Clique Principle in Resolution is unknown. To prove the lower bound we do not use any form of
the Switching Lemma [35], instead we apply a recursive argument specific for binary encodings. Since for the
k-Clique and other principles lower bounds in Resolution for the unary version follow from lower bounds in
Res(log n) for their binary version we start a systematic study of the complexity of proofs in Resolution-based
systems for families of contradictions given in the binary encoding.
We go on to consider the binary version of the weak Pigeonhole Principle Bin-PHPmn
for m > n. Using
the the same recursive approach we prove the new result that for any > 0, Bin-PHPmn
requires proofs of size
2n1− in Res(s) for s = o(log1/2 n). Our lower bound is almost optimal since for m 2
p
n log n there are
quasipolynomial size proofs of Bin-PHPmn
in Res(log n).
Finally we propose a general theory in which to compare the complexity of refuting the binary and unary
versions of large classes of combinatorial principles, namely those expressible as first order formulae in 2-form
and with no finite model
On the proof complexity of Paris-harrington and off-diagonal ramsey tautologies
We study the proof complexity of Paris-Harrington’s Large Ramsey Theorem for bi-colorings of graphs and
of off-diagonal Ramsey’s Theorem. For Paris-Harrington, we prove a non-trivial conditional lower bound
in Resolution and a non-trivial upper bound in bounded-depth Frege. The lower bound is conditional on a
(very reasonable) hardness assumption for a weak (quasi-polynomial) Pigeonhole principle in RES(2). We
show that under such an assumption, there is no refutation of the Paris-Harrington formulas of size quasipolynomial
in the number of propositional variables. The proof technique for the lower bound extends the
idea of using a combinatorial principle to blow up a counterexample for another combinatorial principle
beyond the threshold of inconsistency. A strong link with the proof complexity of an unbalanced off-diagonal
Ramsey principle is established. This is obtained by adapting some constructions due to Erdos and Mills. ˝
We prove a non-trivial Resolution lower bound for a family of such off-diagonal Ramsey principles
A lower bound for the pigeonhole principle in tree-like Resolution by asymmetric Prover-Delayer games
In this note we show that the asymmetric Prover–Delayer game developed in Beyersdorff et al. (2010) [2] for Parameterized Resolution is also applicable to other tree-like proof systems. In particular, we use this asymmetric Prover–Delayer game to show a lower bound of the form 2Ω(nlogn) for the pigeonhole principle in tree-like Resolution. This gives a new and simpler proof of the same lower bound established by Iwama and Miyazaki (1999) [7] and Dantchev and Riis (2001) [5]
Resolution over Linear Equations and Multilinear Proofs
We develop and study the complexity of propositional proof systems of varying
strength extending resolution by allowing it to operate with disjunctions of
linear equations instead of clauses. We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations
for hard tautologies like the pigeonhole principle, Tseitin graph tautologies
and the clique-coloring tautologies in these proof systems. Using the
(monotone) interpolation by a communication game technique we establish an
exponential-size lower bound on refutations in a certain, considerably strong,
fragment of resolution over linear equations, as well as a general polynomial
upper bound on (non-monotone) interpolants in this fragment.
We then apply these results to extend and improve previous results on
multilinear proofs (over fields of characteristic 0), as studied in
[RazTzameret06]. Specifically, we show the following:
1. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas polynomially simulate a
certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations.
2. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas admit polynomial-size
refutations of the pigeonhole principle and Tseitin graph tautologies. The
former improve over a previous result that established small multilinear proofs
only for the \emph{functional} pigeonhole principle. The latter are different
than previous proofs, and apply to multilinear proofs of Tseitin mod p graph
tautologies over any field of characteristic 0.
We conclude by connecting resolution over linear equations with extensions of
the cutting planes proof system.Comment: 44 page
A Generalized Method for Proving Polynomial Calculus Degree Lower Bounds
We study the problem of obtaining lower bounds for polynomial calculus (PC)
and polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) on proof degree, and hence by
[Impagliazzo et al. '99] also on proof size. [Alekhnovich and Razborov '03]
established that if the clause-variable incidence graph of a CNF formula F is a
good enough expander, then proving that F is unsatisfiable requires high PC/PCR
degree. We further develop the techniques in [AR03] to show that if one can
"cluster" clauses and variables in a way that "respects the structure" of the
formula in a certain sense, then it is sufficient that the incidence graph of
this clustered version is an expander. As a corollary of this, we prove that
the functional pigeonhole principle (FPHP) formulas require high PC/PCR degree
when restricted to constant-degree expander graphs. This answers an open
question in [Razborov '02], and also implies that the standard CNF encoding of
the FPHP formulas require exponential proof size in polynomial calculus
resolution. Thus, while Onto-FPHP formulas are easy for polynomial calculus, as
shown in [Riis '93], both FPHP and Onto-PHP formulas are hard even when
restricted to bounded-degree expanders.Comment: Full-length version of paper to appear in Proceedings of the 30th
Annual Computational Complexity Conference (CCC '15), June 201
Tree resolution proofs of the weak pigeon-hole principle.
We prove that any optimal tree resolution proof of PHPn m is of size 2&thetas;(n log n), independently from m, even if it is infinity. So far, only a 2Ω(n) lower bound has been known in the general case. We also show that any, not necessarily optimal, regular tree resolution proof PHPn m is bounded by 2O(n log m). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the worst case proof complexity has been considered. Finally, we discuss possible connections of our result to Riis' (1999) complexity gap theorem for tree resolution
- …