80,047 research outputs found
Historical forest biomass dynamics modelled with Landsat spectral trajectories
Acknowledgements National Forest Inventory data are available online, provided by Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (España). Landsat images are available online, provided by the USGS.Peer reviewedPostprin
Breaking new ground in mapping human settlements from space -The Global Urban Footprint-
Today 7.2 billion people inhabit the Earth and by 2050 this number will have
risen to around nine billion, of which about 70 percent will be living in
cities. Hence, it is essential to understand drivers, dynamics, and impacts of
the human settlements development. A key component in this context is the
availability of an up-to-date and spatially consistent map of the location and
distribution of human settlements. It is here that the Global Urban Footprint
(GUF) raster map can make a valuable contribution. The new global GUF binary
settlement mask shows a so far unprecedented spatial resolution of 0.4 arcsec
() that provides - for the first time - a complete picture of the
entirety of urban and rural settlements. The GUF has been derived by means of a
fully automated processing framework - the Urban Footprint Processor (UFP) -
that was used to analyze a global coverage of more than 180,000 TanDEM-X and
TerraSAR-X radar images with 3m ground resolution collected in 2011-2012.
Various quality assessment studies to determine the absolute GUF accuracy based
on ground truth data on the one hand and the relative accuracies compared to
established settlements maps on the other hand, clearly indicate the added
value of the new global GUF layer, in particular with respect to the
representation of rural settlement patterns. Generally, the GUF layer achieves
an overall absolute accuracy of about 85\%, with observed minima around 65\%
and maxima around 98 \%. The GUF will be provided open and free for any
scientific use in the full resolution and for any non-profit (but also
non-scientific) use in a generalized version of 2.8 arcsec ().
Therewith, the new GUF layer can be expected to break new ground with respect
to the analysis of global urbanization and peri-urbanization patterns,
population estimation or vulnerability assessment
Assessing the role of EO in biodiversity monitoring: options for integrating in-situ observations with EO within the context of the EBONE concept
The European Biodiversity Observation Network (EBONE) is a European contribution on terrestrial monitoring to GEO BON, the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network. EBONEâs aims are to develop a system of biodiversity observation at regional, national and European levels by assessing existing approaches in terms of their validity and applicability starting in Europe, then expanding to regions in Africa. The objective of EBONE is to deliver:
1. A sound scientific basis for the production of statistical estimates of stock and change of key indicators;
2. The development of a system for estimating past changes and forecasting and testing policy options and management strategies for threatened ecosystems and species;
3. A proposal for a cost-effective biodiversity monitoring system.
There is a consensus that Earth Observation (EO) has a role to play in monitoring biodiversity. With its capacity to observe detailed spatial patterns and variability across large areas at regular intervals, our instinct suggests that EO could deliver the type of spatial and temporal coverage that is beyond reach with in-situ efforts. Furthermore, when considering the emerging networks of in-situ observations, the prospect of enhancing the quality of the information whilst reducing cost through integration is compelling. This report gives a realistic assessment of the role of EO in biodiversity monitoring and the options for integrating in-situ observations with EO within the context of the EBONE concept (cfr. EBONE-ID1.4). The assessment is mainly based on a set of targeted pilot studies. Building on this assessment, the report then presents a series of recommendations on the best options for using EO in an effective, consistent and sustainable biodiversity monitoring scheme.
The issues that we faced were many:
1. Integration can be interpreted in different ways. One possible interpretation is: the combined use of independent data sets to deliver a different but improved data set; another is: the use of one data set to complement another dataset.
2. The targeted improvement will vary with stakeholder group: some will seek for more efficiency, others for more reliable estimates (accuracy and/or precision); others for more detail in space and/or time or more of everything.
3. Integration requires a link between the datasets (EO and in-situ). The strength of the link between reflected electromagnetic radiation and the habitats and their biodiversity observed in-situ is function of many variables, for example: the spatial scale of the observations; timing of the observations; the adopted nomenclature for classification; the complexity of the landscape in terms of composition, spatial structure and the physical environment; the habitat and land cover types under consideration.
4. The type of the EO data available varies (function of e.g. budget, size and location of region, cloudiness, national and/or international investment in airborne campaigns or space technology) which determines its capability to deliver the required output.
EO and in-situ could be combined in different ways, depending on the type of integration we wanted to achieve and the targeted improvement. We aimed for an improvement in accuracy (i.e. the reduction in error of our indicator estimate calculated for an environmental zone). Furthermore, EO would also provide the spatial patterns for correlated in-situ data.
EBONE in its initial development, focused on three main indicators covering:
(i) the extent and change of habitats of European interest in the context of a general habitat assessment;
(ii) abundance and distribution of selected species (birds, butterflies and plants); and
(iii) fragmentation of natural and semi-natural areas.
For habitat extent, we decided that it did not matter how in-situ was integrated with EO as long as we could demonstrate that acceptable accuracies could be achieved and the precision could consistently be improved. The nomenclature used to map habitats in-situ was the General Habitat Classification. We considered the following options where the EO and in-situ play different roles:
using in-situ samples to re-calibrate a habitat map independently derived from EO; improving the accuracy of in-situ sampled habitat statistics, by post-stratification with correlated EO data; and using in-situ samples to train the classification of EO data into habitat types where the EO data delivers full coverage or a larger number of samples.
For some of the above cases we also considered the impact that the sampling strategy employed to deliver the samples would have on the accuracy and precision achieved.
Restricted access to European wide species data prevented work on the indicator âabundance and distribution of speciesâ.
With respect to the indicator âfragmentationâ, we investigated ways of delivering EO derived measures of habitat patterns that are meaningful to sampled in-situ observations
Deep learning in remote sensing: a review
Standing at the paradigm shift towards data-intensive science, machine
learning techniques are becoming increasingly important. In particular, as a
major breakthrough in the field, deep learning has proven as an extremely
powerful tool in many fields. Shall we embrace deep learning as the key to all?
Or, should we resist a 'black-box' solution? There are controversial opinions
in the remote sensing community. In this article, we analyze the challenges of
using deep learning for remote sensing data analysis, review the recent
advances, and provide resources to make deep learning in remote sensing
ridiculously simple to start with. More importantly, we advocate remote sensing
scientists to bring their expertise into deep learning, and use it as an
implicit general model to tackle unprecedented large-scale influential
challenges, such as climate change and urbanization.Comment: Accepted for publication IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazin
Mapping cognitive ontologies to and from the brain
Imaging neuroscience links brain activation maps to behavior and cognition
via correlational studies. Due to the nature of the individual experiments,
based on eliciting neural response from a small number of stimuli, this link is
incomplete, and unidirectional from the causal point of view. To come to
conclusions on the function implied by the activation of brain regions, it is
necessary to combine a wide exploration of the various brain functions and some
inversion of the statistical inference. Here we introduce a methodology for
accumulating knowledge towards a bidirectional link between observed brain
activity and the corresponding function. We rely on a large corpus of imaging
studies and a predictive engine. Technically, the challenges are to find
commonality between the studies without denaturing the richness of the corpus.
The key elements that we contribute are labeling the tasks performed with a
cognitive ontology, and modeling the long tail of rare paradigms in the corpus.
To our knowledge, our approach is the first demonstration of predicting the
cognitive content of completely new brain images. To that end, we propose a
method that predicts the experimental paradigms across different studies.Comment: NIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems), United States (2013
Monitoring land use changes using geo-information : possibilities, methods and adapted techniques
Monitoring land use with geographical databases is widely used in decision-making. This report presents the possibilities, methods and adapted techniques using geo-information in monitoring land use changes. The municipality of Soest was chosen as study area and three national land use databases, viz. Top10Vector, CBS land use statistics and LGN, were used. The restrictions of geo-information for monitoring land use changes are indicated. New methods and adapted techniques improve the monitoring result considerably. Providers of geo-information, however, should coordinate on update frequencies, semantic content and spatial resolution to allow better possibilities of monitoring land use by combining data sets
Automated Visual Fin Identification of Individual Great White Sharks
This paper discusses the automated visual identification of individual great
white sharks from dorsal fin imagery. We propose a computer vision photo ID
system and report recognition results over a database of thousands of
unconstrained fin images. To the best of our knowledge this line of work
establishes the first fully automated contour-based visual ID system in the
field of animal biometrics. The approach put forward appreciates shark fins as
textureless, flexible and partially occluded objects with an individually
characteristic shape. In order to recover animal identities from an image we
first introduce an open contour stroke model, which extends multi-scale region
segmentation to achieve robust fin detection. Secondly, we show that
combinatorial, scale-space selective fingerprinting can successfully encode fin
individuality. We then measure the species-specific distribution of visual
individuality along the fin contour via an embedding into a global `fin space'.
Exploiting this domain, we finally propose a non-linear model for individual
animal recognition and combine all approaches into a fine-grained
multi-instance framework. We provide a system evaluation, compare results to
prior work, and report performance and properties in detail.Comment: 17 pages, 16 figures. To be published in IJCV. Article replaced to
update first author contact details and to correct a Figure reference on page
- âŠ