Analysis of Network Clustering Algorithms and Cluster Quality Metrics at Scale

Notions of community quality underlie network clustering. While studies surrounding network clustering are increasingly common, a precise understanding of the realtionship between different cluster quality metrics is unknown. In this paper, we examine the relationship between stand-alone cluster quality metrics and information recovery metrics through a rigorous analysis of four widely-used network clustering algorithms -- Louvain, Infomap, label propagation, and smart local moving. We consider the stand-alone quality metrics of modularity, conductance, and coverage, and we consider the information recovery metrics of adjusted Rand score, normalized mutual information, and a variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work. Our study includes both synthetic graphs and empirical data sets of sizes varying from 1,000 to 1,000,000 nodes. We find significant differences among the results of the different cluster quality metrics. For example, clustering algorithms can return a value of 0.4 out of 1 on modularity but score 0 out of 1 on information recovery. We find conductance, though imperfect, to be the stand-alone quality metric that best indicates performance on information recovery metrics. Our study shows that the variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work cannot be assumed to differ only slightly from traditional normalized mutual information. Smart local moving is the best performing algorithm in our study, but discrepancies between cluster evaluation metrics prevent us from declaring it absolutely superior. Louvain performed better than Infomap in nearly all the tests in our study, contradicting the results of previous work in which Infomap was superior to Louvain. We find that although label propagation performs poorly when clusters are less clearly defined, it scales efficiently and accurately to large graphs with well-defined clusters

Local Edge Betweenness based Label Propagation for Community Detection in Complex Networks

Nowadays, identification and detection community structures in complex networks is an important factor in extracting useful information from networks. Label propagation algorithm with near linear-time complexity is one of the most popular methods for detecting community structures, yet its uncertainty and randomness is a defective factor. Merging LPA with other community detection metrics would improve its accuracy and reduce instability of LPA. Considering this point, in this paper we tried to use edge betweenness centrality to improve LPA performance. On the other hand, calculating edge betweenness centrality is expensive, so as an alternative metric, we try to use local edge betweenness and present LPA-LEB (Label Propagation Algorithm Local Edge Betweenness). Experimental results on both real-world and benchmark networks show that LPA-LEB possesses higher accuracy and stability than LPA when detecting community structures in networks.Comment: 6 page

Multi-objective community detection applied to social and COVID-19 constructed networks

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University LondonCommunity Detection plays an integral part in network analysis, as it facilitates understanding the structures and functional characteristics of the network. Communities organize real-world networks into densely connected groups of nodes. This thesis provides a critical analysis of the Community Detection and highlights the main areas including algorithms, evaluation metrics, applications, and datasets in social networks. After defining the research gap, this thesis proposes two Attribute-Based Label Propagation algorithms that maximizes both Modularity and homogeneity. Homogeneity is considered as an objective function one time, and as a constraint another time. To better capture the homogeneity of real-world networks, a new Penalized Homogeneity degree (PHd) is proposed, that can be easily personalized based on the network characteristics. For the first time, COVID-19 tracing data are utilized to form two dataset networks: one is based on the virus transition between the world countries. While the second dataset is an attributed network based on the virus transition among the contact-tracing in the Kingdom of Bahrain. This type of networks that is concerned in tracking a disease was not formed based on COVID-19 virus and has never been studied as a community detection problem. The proposed datasets are validated and tested in several experiments. The proposed Penalized Homogeneity measure is personalized and used to evaluate the proposed attributed network. Extensive experiments and analysis are carried out to evaluate the proposed methods and benchmark the results with other well-known algorithms. The results are compared in terms of Modularity, proposed PHd, and accuracy measures. The proposed methods have achieved maximum performance among other methods, with 26.6% better performance in Modularity, and 33.96% in PHd on the proposed dataset, as well as noteworthy results on benchmarking datasets with improvement in Modularity measures of 7.24%, and 4.96% respectively, and proposed PHd values 27% and 81.9%