Rough action on topological rough groups

[EN] In this paper we explore the interrelations between rough set theory and group theory. To this end, we first define a topological rough group homomorphism and its kernel. Moreover, we introduce rough action and topological rough group homeomorphisms, providing several examples. Next, we combine these two notions in order to define topological rough homogeneous spaces, discussing results concerning open subsets in topological rough groups.The authors wish to thank the Deanship for Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University for financially funding this project under grant no. KEP-PhD-2-130-39. Also, we would like to thank the editor and referees for their valuable suggestions which have improved the presentation of the paper.Altassan, A.; Alharbi, N.; Aydi, H.; Özel, C. (2020). Rough action on topological rough groups. Applied General Topology. 21(2):295-304. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2020.13156OJS295304212S. Akduman, E. Zeliha, A. Zemci and S. Narli, Rough topology on covering based rough sets, 1st International Eurasian Conference on Mathematical Sciences and Applications (IECMSA), Prishtine, Kosovo, 3ÔÇô7 September 2012.S. Akduman, A. Zemci and C. Özel, Rough topology on covering-based rough sets, Int. J. Computational Systems Engineering 2, no. 2 (2015),107-111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSYSE.2015.077056N. Alharbi, H. Aydi and C. Özel, Rough spaces on covering based rough sets, European Journal of Pure And Applied Mathematics (EJPAM) 12, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v12i2.3420N. Alharbi, H. Aydi, C. Park and C. Özel, On topological rough groups, J. Computational Analysis and Applications 29, no. 1 (2021), 117 -122.A. Arhangel'skii and M. Tkachenko, Topological groups and related structures, Atlantis press/ World Scientific, Amsterdam-Paris, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-35-0N. Bagirmaz, I. Icen and A. F. Ozcan, Topological rough groups, Topol. Algebra Appl. 4 (2016), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/taa-2016-0004R. Biswas and S. Nanda, Rough groups and rough subgroups, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 42 (1994), 251-254.E. Brynairski, A calculus of rough sets of the first order, Bull. of the Polish Academy Sciences: Mathematics 37, no. 1-6 (1989), 71-78.G. Chiaselotti and F. Infusino, Some classes of abstract simplicial complexes motivated by module theory, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 225 (2020), 106471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106471G. Chiaselotti and F. Infusino, Alexandroff topologies and monoid actions, Forum Mathematicum 32, no. 3 (2020), 795-826. https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2019-0283G. Chiaselotti, F. Infusino and P. A. Oliverio, Set relations and set systems induced by some families of integral domains, Advances in Mathematics 363 (2020), 106999, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2020.106999G. Chiaselotti, T. Gentile and F. Infusino, Lattice representation with algebraic granular computing methods, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 27, no. 1 (2020), P1.19. https://doi.org/10.37236/8786S. Hallan, A. Asberg and T. H. Edna, Additional value of biochemical tests in suspected acute appendicitis, European Journal of Surgery 163, no. 7 (1997), 533-538.R. R. Hashemi, F. R. Jelovsek and M. Razzaghi, Developmental toxicity risk assessment: A rough sets approach, Methods of Information in Medicine 32, no. 1 (1993), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634890A. Huang, H. Zhao and W. Zhu, Nullity-based matroid of rough sets and its application to attribute reduction, Information Sciences 263 (2014), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.11.014A. Kusiak, Decomposition in data mining: An industrial case study, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing 23 (2000), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1109/6104.895081A. Kusiak, Rough set theory: A data mining tool for semiconductor manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing 24, no. 1(2001), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/6104.924792C. A. Neelima and P. Isaac, Rough anti-homomorphism on a rough group, Global Journal of Mathematical Sciences: Theory and Practical 6, no. 2, (2014), 79-80.M. Novotny and Z. Pawlak, On rough equalities, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Mathematics 33, no. 1-2 (1985), 99-104.N. Paul, Decision making in an information system via new topology, Annals of fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics 12, no. 5 (2016), 591-600.Z. Pawlak,Rough sets, Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11, no. 5 (1982), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956J. Pomykala, The stone algebra of rough sets, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Mathematics 36, no. 7-8 (1988), 495-508.J. Tanga, K. Shea, F. Min and W. Zhu, A matroidal approach to rough set theory, Theoretical Computer Science 471 (2013), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.10.060S. Wang, Q. Zhu, W. Zhu and F. Min, Graph and matrix approaches to rough sets through matroids, Information Sciences 288 (2014), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.023S. Wang, Q. Zhu, W. Zhu and F. Min, Rough set characterization for 2-circuit matroid, Fundamenta Informaticae 129 (2014), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2013-97

A comprehensive study of implicator-conjunctor based and noise-tolerant fuzzy rough sets: definitions, properties and robustness analysis

© 2014 Elsevier B.V. Both rough and fuzzy set theories offer interesting tools for dealing with imperfect data: while the former allows us to work with uncertain and incomplete information, the latter provides a formal setting for vague concepts. The two theories are highly compatible, and since the late 1980s many researchers have studied their hybridization. In this paper, we critically evaluate most relevant fuzzy rough set models proposed in the literature. To this end, we establish a formally correct and unified mathematical framework for them. Both implicator-conjunctor-based definitions and noise-tolerant models are studied. We evaluate these models on two different fronts: firstly, we discuss which properties of the original rough set model can be maintained and secondly, we examine how robust they are against both class and attribute noise. By highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of the different fuzzy rough set models, this study appears a necessary first step to propose and develop new models in future research.Lynn D’eer has been supported by the Ghent University Special Research Fund, Chris Cornelis was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology under the project TIN2011-28488 and the Andalusian Research Plans P11-TIC-7765 and P10-TIC-6858, and by project PYR-2014-8 of the Genil Program of CEI BioTic GRANADA and Lluis Godo has been partially supported by the Spanish MINECO project EdeTRI TIN2012-39348-C02-01Peer Reviewe