17,265 research outputs found
$1.00 per RT #BostonMarathon #PrayForBoston: analyzing fake content on Twitter
This study found that 29% of the most viral content on Twitter during the Boston bombing crisis were rumors and fake content.AbstractOnline social media has emerged as one of the prominent channels for dissemination of information during real world events. Malicious content is posted online during events, which can result in damage, chaos and monetary losses in the real world. We analyzed one such media i.e. Twitter, for content generated during the event of Boston Marathon Blasts, that occurred on April, 15th, 2013. A lot of fake content and malicious profiles originated on Twitter network during this event. The aim of this work is to perform in-depth characterization of what factors influenced in malicious content and profiles becoming viral. Our results showed that 29% of the most viral content on Twitter, during the Boston crisis were rumors and fake content; while 51% was generic opinions and comments; and rest was true information. We found that large number of users with high social reputation and verified accounts were responsible for spreading the fake content. Next, we used regression prediction model, to verify that, overall impact of all users who propagate the fake content at a given time, can be used to estimate the growth of that content in future. Many malicious accounts were created on Twitter during the Boston event, that were later suspended by Twitter. We identified over six thousand such user profiles, we observed that the creation of such profiles surged considerably right after the blasts occurred. We identified closed community structure and star formation in the interaction network of these suspended profiles amongst themselves
Investigating Rumor Propagation with TwitterTrails
Social media have become part of modern news reporting, used by journalists
to spread information and find sources, or as a news source by individuals. The
quest for prominence and recognition on social media sites like Twitter can
sometimes eclipse accuracy and lead to the spread of false information. As a
way to study and react to this trend, we introduce {\sc TwitterTrails}, an
interactive, web-based tool ({\tt twittertrails.com}) that allows users to
investigate the origin and propagation characteristics of a rumor and its
refutation, if any, on Twitter. Visualizations of burst activity, propagation
timeline, retweet and co-retweeted networks help its users trace the spread of
a story. Within minutes {\sc TwitterTrails} will collect relevant tweets and
automatically answer several important questions regarding a rumor: its
originator, burst characteristics, propagators and main actors according to the
audience. In addition, it will compute and report the rumor's level of
visibility and, as an example of the power of crowdsourcing, the audience's
skepticism towards it which correlates with the rumor's credibility. We
envision {\sc TwitterTrails} as valuable tool for individual use, but we
especially for amateur and professional journalists investigating recent and
breaking stories. Further, its expanding collection of investigated rumors can
be used to answer questions regarding the amount and success of misinformation
on Twitter.Comment: 10 pages, 8 figures, under revie
Building online employability: a guide for academic departments
This guide will help academic departments to support students to think about their careers and to use the online environment wisely. Used badly the array of social media and online technologies can seriously disadvantage a studentsâ career development, but if used well they can support students to find out about and transition into their future career.This work was funded by the University of Derbyâs Research for Teaching and Learning
programme
Tweet, but Verify: Epistemic Study of Information Verification on Twitter
While Twitter provides an unprecedented opportunity to learn about breaking
news and current events as they happen, it often produces skepticism among
users as not all the information is accurate but also hoaxes are sometimes
spread. While avoiding the diffusion of hoaxes is a major concern during
fast-paced events such as natural disasters, the study of how users trust and
verify information from tweets in these contexts has received little attention
so far. We survey users on credibility perceptions regarding witness pictures
posted on Twitter related to Hurricane Sandy. By examining credibility
perceptions on features suggested for information verification in the field of
Epistemology, we evaluate their accuracy in determining whether pictures were
real or fake compared to professional evaluations performed by experts. Our
study unveils insight about tweet presentation, as well as features that users
should look at when assessing the veracity of tweets in the context of
fast-paced events. Some of our main findings include that while author details
not readily available on Twitter feeds should be emphasized in order to
facilitate verification of tweets, showing multiple tweets corroborating a fact
misleads users to trusting what actually is a hoax. We contrast some of the
behavioral patterns found on tweets with literature in Psychology research.Comment: Pre-print of paper accepted to Social Network Analysis and Mining
(Springer
When Celebrities Speak: A Nationwide Twitter Experiment Promoting Vaccination in Indonesia
Celebrity endorsements are often sought to influence public opinion. We ask
whether celebrity endorsement per se has an effect beyond the fact that their
statements are seen by many, and whether on net their statements actually lead
people to change their beliefs. To do so, we conducted a nationwide Twitter
experiment in Indonesia with 46 high-profile celebrities and organizations,
with a total of 7.8 million followers, who agreed to let us randomly tweet or
retweet content promoting immunization from their accounts. Our design exploits
the structure of what information is passed on along a retweet chain on Twitter
to parse reach versus endorsement effects. Endorsements matter: tweets that
users can identify as being originated by a celebrity are far more likely to be
liked or retweeted by users than similar tweets seen by the same users but
without the celebrities' imprimatur. By contrast, explicitly citing sources in
the tweets actually reduces diffusion. By randomizing which celebrities tweeted
when, we find suggestive evidence that overall exposure to the campaign may
influence beliefs about vaccination and knowledge of immunization-seeking
behavior by one's network. Taken together, the findings suggest an important
role for celebrity endorsement.Comment: 55 pages, 13 tables, 6 figure
- âŚ