Effective lambda-models vs recursively enumerable lambda-theories

A longstanding open problem is whether there exists a non syntactical model of the untyped lambda-calculus whose theory is exactly the least lambda-theory (l-beta). In this paper we investigate the more general question of whether the equational/order theory of a model of the (untyped) lambda-calculus can be recursively enumerable (r.e. for brevity). We introduce a notion of effective model of lambda-calculus calculus, which covers in particular all the models individually introduced in the literature. We prove that the order theory of an effective model is never r.e.; from this it follows that its equational theory cannot be l-beta or l-beta-eta. We then show that no effective model living in the stable or strongly stable semantics has an r.e. equational theory. Concerning Scott's semantics, we investigate the class of graph models and prove that no order theory of a graph model can be r.e., and that there exists an effective graph model whose equational/order theory is minimum among all theories of graph models. Finally, we show that the class of graph models enjoys a kind of downwards Lowenheim-Skolem theorem.Comment: 34

On Undefined and Meaningless in Lambda Definability

We distinguish between undefined terms as used in lambda definability of partial recursive functions and meaningless terms as used in infinite lambda calculus for the infinitary terms models that generalise the Bohm model. While there are uncountable many known sets of meaningless terms, there are four known sets of undefined terms. Two of these four are sets of meaningless terms. In this paper we first present set of sufficient conditions for a set of lambda terms to serve as set of undefined terms in lambda definability of partial functions. The four known sets of undefined terms satisfy these conditions. Next we locate the smallest set of meaningless terms satisfying these conditions. This set sits very low in the lattice of all sets of meaningless terms. Any larger set of meaningless terms than this smallest set is a set of undefined terms. Thus we find uncountably many new sets of undefined terms. As an unexpected bonus of our careful analysis of lambda definability we obtain a natural modification, strict lambda-definability, which allows for a Barendregt style of proof in which the representation of composition is truly the composition of representations