199 research outputs found
The use of proof plans in tactic synthesis
We undertake a programme of tactic synthesis. We first formalize the notion of
a tactic as a rewrite rule, then give a correctness criterion for this by means of a
reflection mechanism in the constructive type theory OYSTER. We further formalize
the notion of a tactic specification, given as a synthesis goal and a decidability
goal. We use a proof planner. CIAM. to guide the search for inductive proofs
of these, and are able to successfully synthesize several tactics in this fashion.
This involves two extensions to existing methods: context-sensitive rewriting and
higher-order wave rules. Further, we show that from a proof of the decidability
goal one may compile to a Prolog program a pseudo- tactic which may be run to
efficiently simulate the input/output behaviour of the synthetic tacti
Formalizing the Metatheory of Logical Calculi and Automatic Provers in Isabelle/HOL (Invited Talk)
International audienceIsaFoL (Isabelle Formalization of Logic) is an undertaking that aims at developing formal theories about logics, proof systems, and automatic provers, using Isabelle/HOL. At the heart of the project is the conviction that proof assistants have become mature enough to actually help researchers in automated reasoning when they develop new calculi and tools. In this paper, I describe and reflect on three verification subprojects to which I contributed: a first-order resolution prover, an imperative SAT solver, and generalized term orders for λ-free higher-order logic
A Dependently Typed Language with Nontermination
We propose a full-spectrum dependently typed programming language, Zombie, which supports general recursion natively. The Zombie implementation is an elaborating typechecker. We prove type saftey for a large subset of the Zombie core language, including features such as computational irrelevance, CBV-reduction, and propositional equality with a heterogeneous, completely erased elimination form. Zombie does not automatically beta-reduce expressions, but instead uses congruence closure for proof and type inference. We give a specification of a subset of the surface language via a bidirectional type system, which works up-to-congruence, and an algorithm for elaborating expressions in this language to an explicitly typed core language. We prove that our elaboration algorithm is complete with respect to the source type system. Zombie also features an optional termination-checker, allowing nonterminating programs returning proofs as well as external proofs about programs
Evaluation of Datalog queries and its application to the static analysis of Java code
Two approaches for evaluating Datalog programs are presented: one based on boolean
equation systems, and the other based on rewriting logic. The work is presented in the
context of the static analysis of Java programs specified in Datalog.Feliú Gabaldón, MA. (2010). Evaluation of Datalog queries and its application to the static analysis of Java code. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/14016Archivo delegad
Metalevel and reflexive extension in mechanical theorem proving
In spite of many years of research into mechanical assistance for mathematics
it is still much more difficult to construct a proof on a machine than on
paper. Of course this is partly because, unlike a proof on paper, a machine
checked proof must be formal in the strictest sense of that word, but it is
also because usually the ways of going about building proofs on a machine
are limited compared to what a mathematician is used to. This thesis looks
at some possible extensions to the range of tools available on a machine
that might lend a user more flexibility in proving theorems, complementing
whatever is already available.In particular, it examines what is possible in a framework theorem
prover. Such a system, if it is configured to prove theorems in a particular
logic T, must have a formal description of the proof theory of T written
in the framework theory F of the system. So it should be possible to use
whatever facilities are available in F not only to prove theorems of T, but
also theorems about T that can then be used in their turn to aid the user
in building theorems of T.The thesis is divided into three parts. The first describes the theory
FS₀, which has been suggested by Feferman as a candidate for a framework
theory suitable for doing meta-theory. The second describes some experiments with FS₀, proving meta-theorems. The third describes an experiment
in extending the theory PRA, declared in FS₀, with a reflection facility.More precisely, in the second section three theories are formalised:
propositional logic, sorted predicate logic, and the lambda calculus (with
a deBruijn style binding). For the first two the deduction theorem and
the prenex normal form theorem are respectively proven. For the third, a
relational definition of beta-reduction is replaced with an explicit function.In the third section, a method is proposed for avoiding the work involved
in building a full Godel style proof predicate for a theory. It is suggested
that the language be extended with quotation and substitution facilities directly, instead of providing them as definitional extensions. With this, it
is possible to exploit an observation of Solovay's that the Lob derivability
conditions are sufficient to capture the schematic behaviour of a proof
predicate. Combining this with a reflection schema is enough to produce
a non-conservative extension of PRA, and this is demonstrated by some
experiments
Cubical Syntax for Reflection-Free Extensional Equality
We contribute XTT, a cubical reconstruction of Observational Type Theory
which extends Martin-L\"of's intensional type theory with a dependent equality
type that enjoys function extensionality and a judgmental version of the
unicity of identity types principle (UIP): any two elements of the same
equality type are judgmentally equal. Moreover, we conjecture that the typing
relation can be decided in a practical way. In this paper, we establish an
algebraic canonicity theorem using a novel cubical extension (independently
proposed by Awodey) of the logical families or categorical gluing argument
inspired by Coquand and Shulman: every closed element of boolean type is
derivably equal to either 'true' or 'false'.Comment: Extended version; International Conference on Formal Structures for
Computation and Deduction (FSCD), 201
- …